Influence of different surface treatments on marginal adaptation in enamel and dentin

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 297-303

  Onisor, Ioana ^a   Bouillaguet, Serge ^a   Krejci, Ivo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b Div Gerodontologie Prothese A   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Al2o3; CoJet; Marginal adaptation; Ozone

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; OZONE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICON DIOXIDE; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; TETRIC CERAM; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HEAT; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; HEAT; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MOLAR, THIRD; OZONE; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICON DIOXIDE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 34447274780     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abate PF, Molina MJ, Macchi RL. Adhesion of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2001;14:14-17.
2. Ahid F, Andrade MF, Campos EA, Luscino F, Vaz LG. Influence of different dentin etching times and concentrations and air-abrasion technique on dentin microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 2004;17:447-450.
3. Andreatta Filho OD, Bottino MA, Nishioka RS, Valandro LF, Leite FPP. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of a glass-infiltrated ceramic and a resin luting cement. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:61-67.
4. Baysan A, Lynch E. Effect of ozone on the oral microbiota and clinical severity of primary root caries. Am J Dent 2004;17:56-60.
5. Baysan A, Lynch E. The use of ozone in dentistry and medicine. Prim Dent Care. 2005;12:47-52.
6. Baysan A, Lynch E. The use of ozone in dentistry and medicine. Part 2. Ozone and root caries. Prim Dent Care 2006;13:37-41.
7. Baysan A, Whiley RA, Lynch E. Antimicrobial effect of a novel ozone- generating device on micro-organisms associated with primary root carious lesions in vitro. Caries Res 2000;34:498-501.
8. Blatz BM, Sadan A, Blatz U. The effect of silica coating on the resin bond to the intaglio surface of Procera AIICeram restorations. Quintessence Int 2003;34:542-547.
9. Bocci W, Luzzi E, Corradeschi F, Paulesu L, Di Stefano A. Studies on the biological effects of ozone: 3. An attempt to define conditions for optimal induction of cytokines. Lymphokine Cytokine Res 1993;12:121-126.
10. Buonocore MG. Principles of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;67:72-81.
11. Burnett LH Jr, Conceição NE, Pelinos JE, De Paula Eduardo C. Comparative study of influence on tensile bond strength of a composite to dentin using Er:YAG Laser, air abrasion, or air turbine for preparation of cavities. J of Clin Laser Med Surg 2001;9:199-202.
12. Celiberti P, Pazera P, Lussi A. The impact of ozone treatment on enamel physical properties. Am J Dent 2006;19:67-72.
13. Chaves P, Giannini M, Ambrosano GM. Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2002;4:191-196.
14. Chimello TD, Ramos PR, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG, Pecora JD, Corona SAM. Effect of Er:YAG Laser and air abrasion on the tensile bond strength of two adhesive restorative systems to dentin. J Oral Laser Applic 2002;2:223-229.
15. Chung K, Hsu B, Berry T, Hsieh T. Effect of sandblasting on the bond strength of the bondable molar tube bracket. J Oral Rehab 2001;28:418-424.
16. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rise adhesives: effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397-412.
17. Geitel B, Wischnewski R, Jahn K-R Barthel CR, Zimmer S, Roulet J-F. Tensile bond strength of composite to air-abraded dentin. Oper Dent 2004;29:69-74.
18. Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless still brackets. Am J Orthod Dontofacial Orthop 1998;14:387-392.
19. Hanning C, Hahn P, Thiele PP, Attin T. Influence of different repair procedures on bond strength of adhesive filling materials to etched enamel in vitro. Oper Dent 2003;28:800-807.
20. Holmes J. Clinical reversal of root caries using ozone, double-blind, randomised, controlled 18-month trial. Gerodontology 2003;20:106-114.
21. Imamura GM, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB, Swift EJ Jr. Enhancement of resin bonding to heat-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 1996;21:249-256.
22. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems.1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-960.
23. Krejci I, Albertoni M, Lutz F. An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems.2. Toothbrush/ toothpaste abrasion and chemical degradation [in German]. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1164-1168.
24. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:490-494.
25. Krejci I, Fullemann J, Lutz F. Clinical and long-term scanning electron microscopic studies of composite inlays [in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1994;104:1351-1356.
26. Krejci I, Hausler T, Sagesser D, Lutz F. New adhesives in Class V restorations under combined load and simulated dentinal fluid. Dent Mater 1994;10:331-335.
27. Kutsch VK. Microdentistry: a new standard of care. J Mass Dent Soc 1999, 47:35-39.
28. Lambrechts P, Mattar D, De Munck J, Bergmans L, Peumans M, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. Masters of Esthetic Dentistry. Air-abrasion enamel microsurgery to treat enamel white spot lesions of traumatic origin. J Esth Restor Dent 2002;14:167-187.
29. Manhart J, Huth KC, Chen H-Y, Nickel R. Influence of the pretreatment of the occlusal pits and fissures on the retention of a fissure sealant. Am J Dent 2004;17:12-18.
30. Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int 2004;35:845-852.
31. Mujdeci A, Gokay O. The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:245-249.
32. Nikaido T, Kataumi M, Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T. Bond strengths of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Oper Dent 1996;21:218-224.
33. Oliveira MT, Baratieri LN, Anadrada MC. E-Spectroscopy and micromorphology analysis of air abrasion method on metal surface [abstract 939]. IADR 2003, Göteborg, Sweden.
34. Özcan M. Evaluation of alternative intra-oral repair techniques for fractured ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehab 2003;30:194-207.
35. Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Huysmans M-Ch, Vahlbergc T, Kalka W. Bond strength of resin composite to differently conditioned amalgam. Oper Dent 2003;124-140.
36. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-731.
37. Öztas N, Alaçam A, Bardakcy Y. The effect of air abrasion with two new bonding agents on composite repair. Oper Dent 2003;28:149-154.
38. Petridis H, Garefis P, Hirayama H, Kafantaris NM, Koidis PT. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: part 2. Effect of alloy surface treatment on elemental composition of alloy and bond strength. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:77-82.
39. Rathke A, Tymina J, Haller B. Composite repair: effect of different surface treatment protocols [abstract R27], ConsEuro, Rome, Italy, 2006;R27.
40. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:366-373.
41. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658.
42. Sadan A, Blatz MB, Soignet D. Influence of silanization on early bond strength to sandblasted densely sintered alumina. Quintessence Int 2003;34:172-176.
43. Sahafi A, Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E, Gotfredsen K. Effect of surface treatment of prefabricated posts on bonding of a resin cement. Oper Dent 2004;29:60-68.
44. Santos-Pinto L, Peruchi C, Marker VA, Cordeiro R. Effect of handpiece tip design on the cutting efficiency of an air abrasion system. Am J Dent 2001;14:397-401.
45. Schmidlin PR, Zimmermann J, Bindl A. Effect of ozone on enamel and dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:29-32.
46. Shimada Y, Tagami T. Effects of regional enamel and prisms orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 2003;28:20-27.
47. Söderholm K-JM. The Key for the Indirect technique. In: Roulet JF, Degrange M (eds). Adhesion - The silent revolution in dentistry. Carol Stream, Illinois: Quintessence, 2000;81-103.
48. Stavridakis MM, Krejci I, Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured dentin bonding agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 2005;30:747-757.
49. Swift EJ Jr, Brodeur C, Cvitko E, Pires JA. Treatment of composite surfaces for indirect bonding. Dent Mater 1992;8:193-196.
50. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Mattar D, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P. Microtensile bond strength of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment. Oper Dent 2003;28:647-660.
51. Von Beetzen M, Li J, Nicander I, Sundstrom F. Factors influencing shear strength of incrementally cured composite resins. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:275-278.
52. Wiechmann D. Lingual orthodontics (Part 3). Intraoral sandblasting and indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:280-291.