Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions

Quintessence International

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2002, Pages 542-548

  Ermiş, R Banu ^a  

^a SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Class V restoration; Clinical evaluation; Compomer; Noncarious cervical lesion; Polyacid modified resin composite; Resin modified glass ionomer cement

Indexed keywords

COMPOGLASS; COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; F2000 CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILICATE; VITREMER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATRIX BANDS; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SILICATES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH ABRASION; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 0036654255     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Larsen IB, Westergaard J, Stoltze K, Larsen AI, Gyntelberg F, Holmstrup P. A clinical index for evaluating and monitoring dental erosion. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:211-217.
2. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious class V lesions: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent 1999;24:26-30.
3. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int 2000;31:267-274.
4. Matis BA, Cochran M, Carlson T. Longevity of glass-ionomer restorative materials: Results of a 10-year evaluation. Quintessence Int 1996;27:373-382.
5. Neo J, Chew C. Direct tooth-colored materials for noncarious lesions: A 3-year clinical report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:183-188.
6. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: One-year results. Quintessence Int 1991;22:687-692.
7. Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations. Oper Dent 1995;20:7-13.
8. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restoratives: A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999;78:628-637.
9. de Araujo FB, Garcia-Godoy F, Cury JA, Conceição EN. Fluoride release from fluoride-containing materials. Oper Dent 1996;21:185-190.
10. Smith DC. Composition and characteristics of glass ionomer cements. J Am Dent Assoc 1990;120:20-22.
11. Craig RG, Powers JM, Wataha JC. Dental Materials: Properties and Manipulation. St Louis: Mosby, 2000:57-78.
12. Sidhu SK, Sherriff M, Watson TF. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1997;76:1495-1501.
13. Same S, Mante MO, Mante FK. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass ionomer and composite resin restorations. J Clin Dent 1996;7:13-16.
14. Swift EJ, Pawlus MA, Vargas MA. Shear bond strengths of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1995;20:138-143.
15. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in class 5 restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:69-72.
16. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. Studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;71: 1836-1841.
17. Mitra SB. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991;70:75-78.
18. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997;76:883-894.
19. García-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am 2000;44:541-571.
20. Ruse ND. What is a "compomer"? J Can Dent Assoc 1999; 65:500-504.
21. McLean JW, Nicholson JW, Wilson AD. Proposed nomenclature for glass-ionomer dental cements and related materials. Quintessence Int 1994;25:587-589.
22. El-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1999;24:2-8.
23. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30:347-357.
24. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a filled adhesive system in Class 5 restorations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996; 17:750-757.
25. Crisp RJ, Burke FJT. One-year clinical evaluation of compomer restorations placed in general practice. Quintessence Int 2000;31:181-186.
26. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998;23:77-80.
27. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: Two-year results. Quintessence Int 1997;28:255-258.
28. Loguercio AD, Busato ALS, Barbosa AN. Clinical evaluation in cavities class V restorations with different materials [abstract 61]. J Dent Res 1999;78:968.
29. Luo Y, Edward CML, Daniel TSF, Stephen HYW. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restoration: One-year results. Quintessence Int 2000;31: 630-636.
30. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
31. Barkmeier WW, Hammesfahr PD, Latta MA. Bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Prime&Bond 2.1. Oper Dent 1999;24:51-56.
32. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations: A two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1991;122:41-47.
33. Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD, Gregory PN. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 1999;24:9-13.
34. Mount GJ. Adhesion of glass-ionomer cement in the clinical environment. Oper Dent 1991;16:141-148.
35. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Moore BK. Resin-modified glass-ionomers: Effect of dentin primer application on the development of bond strength. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:393-399.
36. Maneenut C, Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical "abrasion" lesions: One-year results. Quintessence Int 1995;26:739-743.
37. Tonn EM, Ryge G. Two-year clinical evaluation of light-cured composite resin restorations in primary molars. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;111:44-48.
38. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quintessence Int 1992;23:143-147.
39. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Papadogiannis Y, Konstantinidis A. Artificial secondary caries around two new F-containing restoratives. Oper Dent 1998;23:81-86.
40. Yip H, Smales RJ. Fluoride release from a polyacid-modified resin composite and 3 resin-modified glass-ionomer materials. Quintessence Int 2000;31:261-266.
41. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent 1998;26:355-359.
42. Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C, Hellwig E. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:388-393.
43. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of class V abrasion/erosion lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121:694-696.