Retention of restorations placed in noncarious cervical lesions after centric and eccentric occlusal loading in a chewing simulator - A pilot study

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 169-174

  Heintze, Siegward D ^a,b   Cavalleri, Andrea ^a  

^a Research and Development   (Liechtenstein)

^b Ivoclar Vivadent   (Liechtenstein)

Author keywords

Adhesive system; Chewing simulator; Eccentric loading; Noncarious cervical lesion; Retention loss; Self etching

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; PROMPT L POP; PROMPT L-POP; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TETRIC CERAM; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM SILICATES; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; PILOT PROJECTS; RESIN CEMENTS; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASES; WATER;

EID: 33745759746     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang Q, Laffoon JE. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:47-56.
2. Behr M, Hindelang U, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of failure rates of adhesive-fixed partial dentures for in vivo and in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:25-30.
3. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Ledwinsky E, Handel G. Fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of conventionally cemented fiber-reinforced composite three-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:467-72.
4. Bell MJ, Burgess JO, Mercante D. Dentin and enamel bond strength of six bonding agents [abstract 1632]. J Dent Res 2003;82(special issue A).
5. Blunck U. Effectiveness of adhesives at class V cavities after three-year waterstorage [abstract 3944]. J Dent Res 2004;83(special issue A).
6. Blunck U, Roulet JF. Effect of one-year waterstorage on the effectiveness of dentin adhesives in Class V composite resin restorations [abstract 946]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A):139.
7. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching adhesive: 1 year results [abstract 192]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A):52.
8. Brackett WW, Covey DA, St Germain HA, Jr. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002;27:218-222.
9. Brackett WW, Haisch LD, Pearce MG, Brackett MG. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:42-45.
10. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Stress-induced cervical lesions. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:718-722.
11. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effect of occlusal load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1994;7:111-114.
12. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84:118-132.
13. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. "No-bottle" vs "multi-bottle" dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001;17:373-380.
14. Friedl KH, Hiller K-A, Jung H, Lichtblau J, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of class V composite restorations using a one-step or a multiple-step adhesive system [abstract 426]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A)79.
15. Friedl KH, Hiller K-A, Jung H, Schlittenbauer T, Lichtblau J, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations using different adhesive systems [abstract 535]. J Dent Res 2004;83(special issue A).
16. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Markl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". Oper Dent 2000;25:26-32.
17. Gagliardi RM, Avelar RP. Evaluation of microleakage using different bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:582-586.
18. Göhring TN, Peters OA, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of inlay-retained adhesive fixed partial dentures after mechanical and thermal stress: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:81-92.
19. Heintze SD. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2005; accepted for publication.
20. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Peschke A, Schüpbach P. Fluorescence microscopy to evaluate the margins of Class V fillings in vitro. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:19-28.
21. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Zellweger G, Ferracane JL. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites in two different wear simulators. Dent Mater 2005;22:166-175.
22. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators - Results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 2005;21:304-317.
23. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent 2002;15:198-210.
24. Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent 2002;15:279-89.
25. Hilton TJ, Vandewalle KS, Egge A, Ferracane JL. A comparison of self-etch adhesive system bond strengths [abstract 23]. J Dent Res 2003;82(Special issue A).
26. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:237-245.
27. Jörgensen KD, Matono R, Shimokobe H. Deformation of cavities and resin fillings in loaded teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1976;84:46-50.
28. Krejci I, Hausler T, Sägesser, Lutz F. New adhesives in Class V restorations under combined load and simulated dentinal fluid. Dent Mater 1994;10:331-335.
29. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:490-494.
30. Krejci I, Lutz F. In-vitro-Testverfahren zur Evaluation dentaler Restaurationssysteme. 3. Korrelation mit In-vivo-Resultaten. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1445-1449.
31. Lang R, Rosentritt M, Sehr M, Handel G. Fracture resistance of PMMA and resin matrix composite-based interim FPD materials. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:381-384.
32. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK, Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng 2004;14:311-321.
33. Litonjua LA, Bush PJ, Andreana S, Tobias TS, Cohen RE. Effects of occlusal load on cervical lesions. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:225-232.
34. Lutz F, Krejci I. Mesio-occlusodistal amalgam restorations: quantitative in vivo data up to 4 years. A data base for the development of amalgam substitutes. Quintessence Int 1994;25:185-190.
35. Munoz C, Dunn J, Fundingsland J, Richter R. Three year clinical performance of Prompt L-Pop [abstract 541]. J Dent Res 2004;83(special issue A).
36. Oilo G. Bond strength testing-what does it mean? Int Dent J 1993;43:492-498.
37. Ottenhoff FA, van der Bill A, van der Glas HW, Bosman F. Control of elevator muscle activity during simulated chewing with varying food resistance in humans. J Neurophysiol 1992;68:933-944.
38. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881.
39. Pollington S, van Noort R. The relative clinical performance of compomer and resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions using a self-etching dentin primer [abstract 448]. J Dent Res 2002;81(special issue A):469.
40. Pollington S, van Noort R. Compomer versus resin composite restorations using a self-etching dentin primer: 18 month results [abstract 11]. J Dent Res 2003;82(special issue C):469.
41. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon P. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial microleakage. Am J Dent 2001;14:344-348.
42. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:295-308.
43. Rees JS. A review of the biomechanics of abfraction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:139-144.
44. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Handel G. Fixed partial dentures: all-ceramics, fibre-reinforced composites and experimental systems. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:873-877.
45. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2004;20:463-469.
46. Sarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:9-20.
47. Schindler HJ, Stengel E, Spiess WE. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures - a clinical-experimental study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:330-336.
48. Shortall AC, Hu XQ, Marquis PM. Potential countersample materials for in vitro simulation wear testing. Dent Mater 2002;18:246-254.
49. van Dijken JW. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004;17:27-32.
50. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent 1994;22:141-146.
51. Wendt SL, McInnes PM, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181-184.
52. Ziecina W, Wagner WC, Neme A-ML, Maxson BB. Shear bond strength of resin composite to human dentin with total-etch and self-etch adhesives [abstract 572]. J Dent Res 2003;82(special issue A).