Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions

Dental Materials

Volumn 24, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 915-922

  van Dijken, Jan W V ^a   Pallesen, Ulla ^b  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Institute of Medical Biology   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Clinical; Dental material; Etch; Glass ionomer; Resin; Restoration; Self etch

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ETCHING; GLASS; IONOMERS; RESINS; RESTORATION;

CERVICAL LESIONS; GLASS IONOMERS; SELF-ETCH;

BONE CEMENT;

COMPOMER; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DYRACT; GLASS IONOMER; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OPTIBOND; PERMAGEN ADHESIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; VITREMER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASES;

EID: 43549087116     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. van Dijken J.W.V. Multi-step versus simplified enamel-dentin bonding systems. Réalités Cliniques 10 (1999) 199-222
2. van Meerbeek B., Perdigão J., Lambrechts P., and Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 26 (1998) 1-20
3. van Dijken J.W.V. Clinical evaluation of four dentin bonding agents in class V abrasion lesions, a four year follow up. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 319-324
4. Peumans M., Kanumilli P., De Munck J., van Landuyt K., Lambrechts P., and van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 864-881
5. Gwinnett A.J., and Yu S. Effect of long-term water storage on dentin bonding. Am J Dent 8 (1996) 109-111
6. Sano H., Yoshikawa T., Pereira P.N., Kanemura N., Morigami M., Tagami J., et al. Long-term durability of dentin bonds made with a self-etching primer, in vivo. J Dent Res 78 (1999) 906-911
7. Hashimoto M., Ohno H., Kaga M., Endo K., Sano H., and Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 79 (2000) 1385-1391
8. van Dijken J.W.V., Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K., and Lindberg A. Clinical long term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Den Mater (2006) [E-published ahead of print]
9. Sudsangiam S., and van Noort R. Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 57-67
10. van Dijken J.W.V. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow up study. Acta Odont Scand 44 (1986) 357-367
11. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics (1956), McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York
12. Burrow M.F., Satoh M., and Tagami J. Dentin bond durability after three years using a dentin bonding agent with and without priming. Dent Mater 12 (1996) 302-307
13. Sano H., Shono T., Takatsu T., and Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resin-impregnated layer. Oper Dent 19 (1994) 59-64
14. Sano H., Takatsu T., Ciucchi B., Horner J.A., Matthews W.G., and Pashley D.H. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 20 (1995) 18-25
15. Armstrong S.R., Vargas M.A., Chung I., Pashley D.H., Campbell J.A., Laffoon J.E., et al. Resin-dentin interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile dentin bond strength after five-year water storage. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 705-711
16. Hashimoto M., Tay F.R., Ohno H., Sano H., Kaga M., Yiu C., et al. SEM and TEM analysis of water degradation of human dentinal collagen. J Biomed Mat Res 66 (2003) 287-298
17. Van Meerbeek B., Peumans M., Verschueren M., Gladys S., Braem M., Lambrechts P., et al. Clinical status of ten adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 1690-1702
18. Duke E., Robbins J.W., and Trevino D. The clinical performance of a new adhesive resin system in Class V and IV restorations. Compen Contin Educ Dent 15 (1994) 852-862
19. Tyas M.J. Clinical performance of two dentin adhesives: 2-year results. J Dent Res 74 (1995) 404 [Abstract no 28]
20. Tyas M.J. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results. Austr Dent J 41 (1996) 324-327
21. Van Meerbeek B., Peumans M., Gladys S., Braem M., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Three year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quint Int 27 (1996) 775-784
22. Trevino D.F., Duke E.S., Robbins J.W., and Summitt J.B. Clinical evaluation of Scotch Bond Multi-Purpose adhesive system. J Dent Res 75 (1996) 397 [Abstract no 3037]
23. Platt J.A., Winkler M.M., Matis B.A., and Moore B.K. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory & clinical performance at two years. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 187 [Abstract no 1368]
24. Platt J.A., Winkler M.M., Matis B.A., and Moore B.K. Correlation of dentin adhesive laboratory & clinical performance at three years. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 236 [Abstract no 1044]
25. Browning W.D., Brackett W.W., and Gilpatrick R.O. Retention of microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious class V lesions: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Operative Dent 24 (1999) 26-30
26. Browning W.D., Brackett W.W., and Gilpatrick R.O. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin based composite in non-carious class V lesions. Operative Dent 25 (2000) 46-50
27. van Dijken J.W.V. Clinical effectiveness of 12 adhesive systems in Class V non-retentive lesions. J Dent Res 80 (2001) 1272 [Abstract no 41]
28. Özgünltay G., and Önen A. Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious class V lesions. J Oral Rehab 29 (2002) 1037-1041
29. Aw T.C., Lepe X., Johnson G.H., and Mancl L.A. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 17 (2004) 451-456
30. Aw T.C., Lepe X., Johnson G.H., and Mancl L.A. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. JADA 136 (2005) 311-322
31. Cury C.G., Teixeira L.C., and Leinfelder K.F. Clinical evaluation of a new dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 71 (1992) 662 [Abstract no 1172]
32. Mazer R.B., Cury C., Teizeira L., and Leinfelder K.F. Influence of maleic acid on the retention of abfracted lesion restorations. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 275 [Abstract no 1389]
33. Tyas M.J. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems. Int Dent J 46 (1996) 10-14
34. Folwaczny M., Loher C., Mehl A., Kunzelmann K.-H., and Hickel R. Tooth-colored filling materials fort he restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study. Operative Dent 25 (2000) 251-258
35. Bayne S.C., Heymann H.O., Wilder A.D., Sturdevant J.R., Robertson T.M., Sluder T.B., et al. Clinical performance of bonding systems with and without hybrid layers. J Dent Res 75 (1996) 23 [Abstract no 47]
36. Boghosian A. Clinical evaluation of a filled adhesive system in class V restorations. Compen Contin Educ Dent 17 (1996) 750-757
37. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lemaire V., Mortier M., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. One-year clinical effectiveness of two total-etch dentin adhesive systems in cervical lesions. J Dent Res 80 (2001) 1203 [Abstract no 17]
38. Boghosian A., Drummond J.L., and Lautenschlager E. Clinical evaluation of a dentin adhesive system. IADR meeting. New Orleans (2007) [Abstract no 228]
39. Dickinson G.L., Smith C.D., and Morris C. Clinical evaluation of Permagen universal bonding system with Amelogen composite. J Dent Res 75 (1996) 397 [Abstract no 3035]
40. Barnes D.M., Blank L.W., and Gingell J.C. Barnes CA. A 24 month clinical evaluation of dyract light cured compomer restorative. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 165 [Abstract no 1213]
41. Elderton R.J., Vowles R.W., Bell C.J., and Marshall K.J. Three year retention of cervical compomer restorations in non-undercut cavities. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 162 [Abstract no 1185]
42. Loher C., Kunzelman K.H., and Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer cements (LC), compolymer and composite restorations in Class V cavities. Two-year results. J Dent Res (1997) 162 [Abstract no 1190]
43. Schuster S., Schreger E., Klimm W., and Koch R. Klinische untersuchungen von klasse-V-kompomerfüllungen. Deutsche Zahnärztl Zeit 52 (1997) 828-832
44. Tyas M.J. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). J Dent Res 76 (1997) 165 [Abstract no 1212]
45. Merte K., Hirsch E., Häfer M., and Fröhlich M. Quality testing of acetone-based primers-a clinical evaluation. J Dent Res 76 (1977) 162 [Abstract no 1187]
46. Wicht M.J., Fritz U.B., and Noack M.J. A one-year follow-up of Class V restorations. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 165 [Abstract no 1210]
47. Abdalla A.L., and Alhadainy H.A. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restorations in Class V abrasion lesios. Two-years results. Quintessence Int 28 (1997) 255-258
48. Jedynakiewicz N.M., Martin N., and Fletcher J.M. A three year clinical evaluation of a compomer restorative. J Dent Res 76 (1997) 162 [Abstract no 1189]
49. Tyas M.J. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Operative Dent 23 (1998) 77-80
50. Klimm W., Schuster S., Schreger E., and Koch R. Clinical evaluation of class V restorations using 3 compomers. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 954 [Abstract no 2580]
51. Wicht M.J., Fritz U.B., and Noack M.J. Influence of enamel etching on Class V Dyract restorations. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 189 [Abstract no 672]
52. Gladys S., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of a glasss-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions. Dent Mater 14 (1998) 294-306
53. Tyas M.J. Three-year cinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Operative Dent 25 (2000) 152-154
54. Merte K., Fröhlich M., Häfer M., Hirsch E., Schneider H., and Winkler M. Two-year clinical performance of two primer adhesives on class V restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 53 (2000) 93-99
55. Lenarda R.d., Cadenaro M., and Stefano Dorigo E.d. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation. Operative Dent 25 (2000) 382-387
56. Folwaczny M., Loher C., Mehl A., Kunzelmann K.-H., Hickel R., and Class V. lesions restored with four different tooth-colored material-3-year results. Clin Oral Inv 5 (2001) 31-39
57. Folwaczny M., Mehl A., Kunzelmann K.-H., and Hickel R. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions, 5-year results. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 153-156
58. Gladys S., van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Clinical effectiveness of a glass ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical class-V lesions after 3 years. J Dent Res 78 (2001) 1205 [Abstract no 33]
59. Ünlü N., Belli S., and Özer F. Clinical evaluation of a compomer resin in Class V abrasion lesions, four year results. J Dent Res 81 (2002) B236 [Abstract no 27]
60. Loguercio A.D., Reis A., Barbosa A.N., and Roulet J.F. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 5 (2003) 323-332
61. Mamenut C., and Tyas M.J. Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical 'abrasion' lesions: one-year results. Quintessence Int. 26 (1995) 739-743
62. Schwartz R.S., Duke E.S., Robbins J.W., and Summitt J.B. Clinical evaluation of Vitremer glass ionomer restorative: 1 year results. J Dent Res 74 (1995) 404 [Abstract no 27]
63. Robbins J.W., Duke E.S., Schwartz R.S., and Trevino D. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer restorative in cervical abrasions. J Dent Res 75 (1996) 39 [Abstract no 171]
64. Duke E., Robbins J.W., Summitt J.B., Schwartz R.S., and Trevino D. Clinical evaluation of Vitremer in cervical abrasions and root caries. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 954 [Abstract no 2578]
65. Gladys S., van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Marginal adaptation and retention of hybrid restorative materials in vivo. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 1208 [Abstract no 10]
66. Ermis R.B. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions. Quintessence Int. 33 (2002) 542-548
67. Chinelatti M.A., Ramos R.P., Chimello D.T., and Palma-Dibb R.G. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Rehab 31 (2004) 251-257
68. Franco E.B., Benetti A.R., Ishikiriama S.K., Santiago S.L., Lauris J.R.P., Jorge M.F.F., et al. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus rersin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cercical lesions. Operative Dent 3 (2006) 403-408
69. Brackett W.W., Haisch L.D., Pearce M.G., and Brackett M.G. Microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations placed with self-etching adhesives. J Prosth Dent 91 (2004) 42-45
70. Perdigao J., Swift Jr. R.J., Denehy G.E., Wefl J.S., and Donly K.J. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 73 (1994) 44-55
71. Eick J.D., Robinson S.J., Chappell R.P., Cobb C.M., and Spencer P. The dentinal surface. Its influence on dentinal adhesion. Part III. Quintessence Int 24 (1993) 571-582
72. Chappell R.P., and Eick J.D. Shear bond strength and scanning electron microscopic observation of six current dentinal adhesives. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 359-368
73. Triolo Jr. P.T., Swift Jr. E.J., and Barkmeier W.W. Shear bond strength of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Operative Dent 20 (1995) 46-50
74. Swift E.J., and Cloe B.C. Shear bond strength of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent 6 (1993) 88-90
75. Beck M.D., Swift E.J., and Denehy G.E. Use of phosphoric acid etchants with Scotchbond Multi-purpose. J Dent Res 72 (1993) 133 [Abstract no 240]
76. Re D., Augusti D., Spreafico, and Gagliani M. Effect of oerator variability on dentin adhesion. J Dent Res (2004) 83 [Abstract no 1740]
77. Kemp-Scholte C.M., and Davidsson C.L. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composire restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69 (1990) 1240-1243
78. Kemp-Scholte C.M., and Davidsson C.L. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthetic Dent 64 (1990) 658-664
79. van Meerbeek B., Inoue S., Perdigão, Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Summitt J.B., Robbins J.W., Schwartz R.S., and Santos J.d. (Eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry. A contemporary approach (2001), Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc., Chicago 178-235
80. Kleverlaan C.J., and Feilzer A.J. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 1150-1157
81. Heymann H.O., Sturdevant J.R., Bayne S., Wilder A.D., Sluder T.B., and Brunson W.D. Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restorations, A two-year clinical studt. J Am Dent Assoc 122 (1991) 41-47
82. Tyas M.J., and Burrow M.F. Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive system, Results at five years. Operative Dent 27 (2002) 438-441
83. van Dijken J.W.V. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions, A 6-year follow-up. J Dent 33 (2005) 541-547
84. Latta M.A. Physcochemical dentin interactions of 2 etch & rinse adhesives. IADR meeting. New Orleans (2007) [Abstract no 1373]
85. Fritz V., Finger W.J., and Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements, Bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 12 (1996) 161-166
86. van Meerbeek B., Braem M., Lambrechts P., and VanHerle G. Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions. J Prosth Dent 70 (1993) 308-314
87. Hall L.H., Cochran M.A., and Swrtz M.L. Class 5 composite resin restorations: margin configurations and distance from the CEJ. Operative Dent 18 (1993) 246-250
88. Grieve A.R., Saunders W.P., and Alani A.H. The effects of dentin bonding agents on marginal leakage of composite restorations-long term studies. J Oral Rehab 20 (1993) 11-18