Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 17-25

  Sensi, Luis Guilherme ^a   Marson, Fabiano Carlos ^a   Baratieri, Luiz Narciso ^a   Junior, Sylvio Monteiro ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Class V composite restorations; Marginal adaptation; Placement techniques

Indexed keywords

FUCHSINE; RESIN; TAP WATER;

ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMERSION; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTICS; RATING SCALE; ROOM TEMPERATURE; SCORING SYSTEM; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 29144444581     PISSN: 15263711     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-6-4-17     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Monteiro Jr S, Sigurjons H, Swartz ML, et al. Evaluation of materials and techniques for restoration of erosion areas. J Prosth Dent 1986; 55:434-442.
2. Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991; 19:24-32.
3. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, et al. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994; 22:195-207.
4. Tyas MJ. The Class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995; 40:167-170.
5. Burgess JO. Dental materials for the restoration of root surface caries. Am J Dent 1995; 8:342-351.
6. Burgess JO, Gallo JR. Treating root-surface caries. Dent Clin of North Am 2002; 46:385-404.
7. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, Andrada MAC, et al. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:213-224.
8. Zidan O, Gomez-Marin O, Tsuchiya T. A comparative study of the effects of dentinal bonding agents and application techniques on marginal gaps in Class V cavities. J Dent Res 1987; 66:716-721.
9. Blunck U, Roulet JF. In vitro marginal quality of dentin-bonded composite resins in Class V cavities. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:407-412.
10. Krejci I, Lutz F. Mixed Class V restorations: the potential of a dentine bonding agent. J Dent 1990;18:263-270.
11. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system. Dent Mater 1997; 13:157-162.
12. Mullejans R, Lang H, Schuler N, et al. Increment technique for extended Class V restorations: an experimental study. Oper Dent 2003; 28:352-356.
13. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC, et al. Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of class V composite restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent 2003;28:482-487.
14. Davidson CL, De Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63:146-148.
15. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in Class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 1988; 67:841-845.
16. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976; 4:199-206.
17. Brannstrom M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984; 9:57-68.
18. Leclaire CC, Blank LW, Hargrave JW, et al. Use of a two-stage composite resin fill to reduce microleakage below the cementoenamel junction. Oper Dent 1988; 13:20-23.
19. Crim GA. Microleakage of three resin placement techniques. Am J Dent 1991; 4:69-72.
20. Trushkowsky RD, Gwinnett AJ. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1996; 9:96-99.
21. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001; 14:132-136.
22. Albers HF. Tooth colored restoratives - principles and techniques. 9th Ed. Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, 2002:183-202.
23. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of a dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int 1986; 17:21-24.
24. Torstenson B, Oden A. Effects of bonding agent types and incremental techniques on minimizing contraction gaps around resin composites. Dent Mater 1989; 5:218-223.
25. Prati C, Montanari G. Comparative microleakage study between the sandwich and conventional three-increment techniques. Quintessence Int 1989; 20:587-594.
26. Martin FE, O'Rourke M. Marginal seal of cervical tooth-coloured restorations. A laboratory investigation of placement techniques. Austr Dent J 1993; 38:102-107.
27. Douglas WH. Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. J Dent 1989;17:209-215.
28. Saunders WP, Strang R, Ahmad I. Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1990; 3:153-156.
29. Koprulu H, Gurgan S, Onen A. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: an investigation of placement techniques. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:729-732.
30. St Georges AJ, Wilder AD Jr, Perdigao J, et al. Microleakage of Class V composites using different placement and curing techniques: an in vitro study. Am J Dent 2002; 15:244-247.
31. Mangum FI, Berry EA. An in vitro study of the effectiveness of bonding agents in preventing microleakage in composite restorations of erosion and abrasion lesions. Gen Dent 1989;37:26-28.
32. Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: Impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 2000; 25:113-120.
33. Aguiar FH, Santos AJ, Groppo FC, et al. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002; 27:475-479.
34. Aguiar FH, Ajudarte KF, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and filling techniques on microleakage of posterior resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002; 27:557-562.