Abfraction Lesions: Myth or Reality?

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 263-271

  Rees, J S ^a   Jagger, D C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; REVIEW; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

EID: 0242266589     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00297.x     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Smith BG, Robb ND. The prevalence of toothwear in 1007 dental patients. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23:232-239.
2. Zsigmondy U. Über die keilfömigennnnnnn defekte an den facialflächen der zahnhälse. Österr Ungar Vjhrschr Zahnärzten 1894; 1:439-442.
3. Spranger H. Investigation into the genesis of angular lesions at the cervical margin of teeth. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:149-154.
4. Grippo JO. Bioengineering seeds of contemplation: a private practitioner's perspective. Dent Mater 1996; 12:198-202.
5. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994; 22:195-207.
6. McCoy G. The etiology of gingival erosion. J Oral Implantol 1982; 10:361-362.
7. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52:374-380.
8. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:14-19.
9. Xhonga FA. Bruxism and its effect on the teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1977; 4:65-76.
10. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherele G. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentine adhesives. Oper Dent 1987; 12:53-78.
11. Graehn G, Berndt C, Staege B. Zur epidemiologie keilfömiger Defekte. Dtsch Stomatol 1991; 41:210-213.
12. Telles D, Pegoraro LF, Pereira JC. Prevalence of noncarious cervical lesions and their relation to occlusal aspects: a clinical study. J Aesthet Dent 2000; 12:10-15.
13. Radentz WH, Barnes GP, Cutright DE. A survey of factors possibly associated with cervical abrasion of tooth surfaces. J Periodontol 1976; 47:148-154.
14. Khan F, Young WG, Shahabi S, Daley TJ. Dental cervical lesions associated with occlusal erosion and attrition. Aust Dent J 1999; 44:176-186.
15. Marion LR, Bayne SC, Shugars DA, et al. Effects of occlusion type and wear on cervical lesion frequency. J Dent Res 1997; 76:309. (Abstr)
16. Waters NE. Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. In: Vincent JFV, Currey D, eds. Mechanical properties of biological material. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980:99-135.
17. Hagberg C. Assessment of bite force: a review. J Craniomandib Disord 1987; 1:162-169.
18. Scott JH, Symons NBB. Introduction to dental anatomy. 9th Ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1982.
19. Picton DCA. On the part played by the socket in tooth support. Arch Oral Biol 1964; 10:945-955.
20. Hood JA. Biomechanics of the intact, prepared and restored tooth: some clinical implications. Int Dent J 1991; 41:25-32.
21. Gordon JE. Structures or why things don't fall down. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin Books Ltd., 1978.
22. Rees JS, Jacobsen PH. The elastic modulus of enamel and dentine. Clin Mater 1993; 14:35-39.
23. Darbar U, Huggett R, Harrison A. Stress analysis techniques in complete dentures. J Dent 1994; 22:259-264.
24. Lukas D, Spranger H. Untersuchungen über die Horizontalbelastung des zahnes bei definierten Unterkieferlateralbewegungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1973; 28:280-282.
25. Lukas D, Spranger H. Untersuchungen über die Auswirkungemn unterschieldlich gemessener Gelenkbahn und Bennetwinkel auf die Horizontalbelastung des zahnesdes zahnes bei definierten Unterkieferlateralbewegungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1973; 28:755-758.
26. Klähn KH, Köhler KU, Kreter, F, Motsch A. Spannungsoptische Untersuchungen zur Entsehung der sogenannten keilförmigen Defekte am Organum dentale. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1974; 29:923-927.
27. Nohl FS, McCabe JF, Walls AWG. The effect of load angle on strains induced in maxillary premolars in vitro. British Society of Dental Research Meeting, University of Leeds, April 12-15, 1999. Alexandria, VA: International Association for Dental Research. (Abstr)
28. Chen KK, Miyake K, Terashita M. Cervical strains induced by occlusal loading. J Dent Res 1999; 78:474. (Abstr)
29. Nohl FS, Setchell DJ. Surface strains induced by measured loads on teeth in vivo: a methodological study. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 2000; 8:27-31.
30. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentoenamel junction of human teeth - a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66:451-459.
31. Goel VK, Khera SC, Singh K. Clinical implications of the response of enamel and dentine to masticatory loads. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64:446-454.
32. Khera SC, Goel VK, Chen RCS, Gurusami SA. A three dimensional finite element model. Oper Dent 1988; 13:128-137.
33. Rees JS. Occlusal loading and the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. In: Middleton J, Jones ML, Ande GN, eds. Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Vol 3. The Netherlands: Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, 2000:729-736.
34. Rees JS. The effect of variation in occlusal loading on the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29:188-193.
35. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in upper incisors, canines and premolars: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111:149-154.
36. Vale WA. Cavity preparation. Ir Dent Rev 1959; 2:33-41.
37. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:1028-1032.
38. Robinson C, Weatherall JA, Hallsworth AS. Variation in composition of dental enamel with thin ground tooth sections. Caries Res 1971; 5:44-57.
39. Poole DFG, Newman HN, Dibdin GH. Structure and porosity of human cervical enamel studied by polarizing microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. Arch Oral Biol 1981; 26:977-982.
40. Spir A. Surface characteristics of human enamel and dentine: a SEM Study. MSc thesis, University of Iowa Graduate College, Iowa City, IA, USA, 1988.
41. Rees JS, Hammadeh M. A comparison of the erosive susceptibility of cuspal and cervical enamel using an ultrasonic technique. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30:204-210.
42. Darling AI, Mortimer KV, Poole DFG, Ollis WD. Molecular sieve behaviour of normal and carious human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1961; 5:251-273.
43. Dibdin GH. The internal surface and pore structure of enamel. J Dent Res 1969; 48:771-776.
44. Fox PG. The toughness of tooth enamel, a natural fibrous composite. J Mater Sci 1980; 15:3113-3121.
45. Braden M, Bairstow A, Beider I, Ritter B. Electrical and piezoelectrical properties of dental hard tissues. Nature 1966; 212:1565-1566.
46. Vincent J. Structural biomaterials. 2nd Ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.
47. Grippo JO, Masi JV. Role of biodental engineering factors (BEF) in the etiology of root caries. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:71-76.
48. Whitehead SA, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Development of noncarious cervical notch lesions in vitro. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:332-337.
49. Wang J, Smith BG. The effect of occlusal force on the formation of experimental cervical wedge-shaped defects on human teeth. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1995; 30:268-270.
50. Lecomte P, Dawes C. The influence of salivary flow rate on diffusion of potassium chloride from artificial plaque at different sites in the mouth. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1614-1618.
51. Hall RC, Embery G, Shellis RP. Biological and structural features of enamel and dentine: current concepts relevant to erosion and dentine hypersensitivity. In: Addy M, Embery G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R, eds. Tooth wear and sensitivity. London: Martin Dunitz, 2000:3-18.
52. Dowell PD, Addy M, Dummer PMH. Dentine hypersensitivity. Aetiology, differential diagnosis and management. Br Dent J 1985; 158:92-96.
53. Addy M, Mostafa P, Newcombe RG. Dentine hypersensitivity: the distribution of recession, sensitivity and plaque. J Dent 1987; 5:242-248.
54. Ohaba S, Kiba H, Kuwabara M, Yoshida H, Koide F, Takeishi MA. Histopathological study of neck lesions in feline teeth. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29:216-220.
55. Burke FJ, Johnston N, Wiggs RB, Hall AF. An alternative hypothesis from veterinary science for the pathogenesis of noncarious cervical lesions. Quintessence Int 2000; 31:475-482.
56. Stanford JW, Paffenbarger GC, Kampula JW. Determination of some compressive properties of human enamel and dentine. J Am Dent Assoc 1958; 57:487-492.
57. Cooper WEG, Smith DC. Determination of the shear strength of enamel and dentine. J Dent Res 1968; 47:997-999.
58. Hannah C. Mechanical properties of human enamel and dentine and of composite restorative materials. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, England, 1974.
59. Bowen RL, Rodriguez MM. Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1962; 64:378-382.
60. Tyldesley WR. The mechanical properties of human enamel and dentine. Br Dent J 1959; 106:269-273.