Perioesthetic Approach to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Carious and Noncarious Cervical Lesions: Part II

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 284-296

  Terry, Douglas A ^a,d   McGuire, Michael K ^a   McLaren, Edward ^b   Fulton, Rudolph ^a   Swift Jr , Edward J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; DENTISTRY; ENAMEL; ESTHETIC SURGERY; FEMALE; GINGIVA; HUMAN; POLYMERIZATION; TOOTH;

EID: 0242298293     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00299.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Ferrier WI. Clinical observations on erosions and their restoration. J Calif Dent Assoc 1931; 7:187-196.
2. Stebner CM. The class five cavity - its treatment with gold foil. J Am Acad Gold Foil Oper 1959; 2:79-84.
3. Wirth-Flynn M. Composite resins versus gold foil for the restoration of class V lesions. Quintessence Int 1978; 9:29-34.
4. Phillips RW. The restoration of eroded cervical areas. CDS Rev 1980; 73(4):31-34.
5. Bader JD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA, et al. How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:46-54.
6. Cuenin M, Clem B. Periodontal and restorative treatment of the class V lesion. Gen Dent 1993; 41:252-254.
7. Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: the decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:55-64.
8. Mount GJ. Restorations of eroded areas. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120:31-35.
9. Cvitko E, Denehy GE. Utilization of composite resins and direct bonding following periodontal treatment. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993; 5:33-38.
10. Cox CF. Etiology and treatment of root hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 1994; 7:266-270.
11. Miller MB. Restoring class V lesion. Part 1: carious lesions. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9:441-442.
12. Eccles JD. Tooth surfaces loss from abrasion, attrition, and erosion. Dent Update 1982; 9:373-381.
13. Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, et al. Restorative therapy for erosive lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104:229-240.
14. Mount GJ. Glass-ionomer cements: past, present, and future. Oper Dent 1994; 19:82-90.
15. Mount GJ. Esthetics with glass-ionomer cements and the "sandwich" technique. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:93-101.
16. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Soelberg KB, et al. Microleakage of four composite resin over a glass ionomer cement base in class V restorations. Quintessence Int 1985; 12:817-820.
17. Ngo H, Earl MSA, Mount GJ. Glass ionomer: a 12-month evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:203-205.
18. Lim KC. The microleakage of a glass ionomer cement using two methods of moisture protection. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:835-839.
19. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 8th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1989.
20. Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. Am J Dent 1995; 8:59-67.
21. Tyas MJ. The class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995; 40:167-170.
22. Koprulu H, Gurgan S, Onen A. Marginal seal of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material: an investigation of placement techniques. Quintessence Int 1995; 26:729-732.
23. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12:161-166.
24. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996; 12:64-69.
25. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, et al. Examining tooth flexure effects. J Am Dent Assoc 1991; 70:1542-1544.
26. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium 1994; 15:1396-1400.
27. Capel-Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, et al. Microleakage of class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999; 12:291-294.
28. Prager MC. Using flowable composites in direct posterior restorations. Dent Today 1997; 16(7):62-68.
29. Gilmore HW, Lund MR. Operative dentistry. 2nd Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1973.
30. Lutz FU, Krejci I, Oddera M. Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:385-394.
31. Moffa JP. Comparative performance of amalgam and composite resin restorations and criteria for their use. In: Anusavice KJ, ed. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence Pub. Co., Inc., 1989:125-133.
32. Leinfelder KF. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1996; 127:743-748.
33. Sturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann H, Sturdevant JR. The art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd Ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, 1995.
34. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV, Perdigão J, et al. Direct posterior composite resin restorations: current concepts for the technique. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10:875-886.
35. DeGrange M, ed. Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., 1997.
36. Strassler HE. Esthetic posterior restorations: direct composite restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4:216-220.
37. Bichacho N. Direct composite resin restorations of the anterior single tooth: clinical implications and practical applications. Compendium 1996; 17:796-801.
38. Leinfelder KF. Restoration of abfracted lesions. Compendium 1994; 15:1396-1400.
39. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:53-58.
40. Bouschlicher MR, Cobb DS, Vargas MA. Effect of two abrasive systems on resin bonding to laboratory-processed indirect resin composite restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:185-195.
41. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396-1399.
42. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. The presence of bacteria in cavities filled with silicate cement and composite resin materials. Swed Dent J 1971; 64:149-155.
43. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Swift EJ. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:687-701.
44. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal sealing of curing contraction gaps in class V composite resin restorations. J Dent Res 1988; 67:841-845.
45. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240-1243.
46. Krejci L, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991; 19:24-32.
47. Estafan D, Dussetschleger FL, Miuo LE, et al. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin. Gen Dent 2000; 48:78-80.
48. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Horstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of a class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 2000; 58:77-84.
49. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26:1-20.
50. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Pelka M, et al. Internal adaptation of direct class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1999; 3:208-215.
51. Brackett WW. The etiology and treatment of cervical erosion. J Tenn Dent Assoc 1994; 74(3):14-18.
52. Croll TP. Alternative methods for use of the rubber dam. Quintessence Int 1985; 16:387-392.
53. Liebenberg WH. General field isolation and the cementation of indirect restorations. Part I. Dent Assoc S Afr 1994; 49:415-419.
54. Kanca J. Improving bond strength throughout etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 123:35-43.
55. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:133-138.
56. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. II. Bonding to enamel. Quintessence Int 1992; 23:625-627.
57. Cox CF, Bergenholtz G, Heys DR, et al. Pulp capping of dental pulp mechanically exposed to oral microflora: a 1-2 year observation or wound healing in the monkey. J Oral Pathol Med 1985; 14:156-168.
58. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol Med 1982; 11:439-450.
59. Goracci G, Mori G. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin and calcium hydroxide-dentin interface with resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:129-135.
60. Brännström M. Sensitivity of dentine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1966; 21:517-526.
61. Cox CF, Suzuki S. Re-evaluating pulp protection: calcium hydroxide liners vs. cohesive hybridization. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:823-831.
62. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, et al. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulps. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:1-8.
63. Cox CF, Subay RK, Suzuki S, et al. Biocompatibility of various dental materials: pulp healing with a surface seal. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996; 16:240-251.
64. Duke ES. Direct posterior composites. J Indiana Dent Assoc 1993; 72:35-39.
65. Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10:325-330.
66. Chen RC, Chan DC, Chan KC. A quantitative study of finishing and polishing techniques for a composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59:292-297.
67. Vanni L. Light and color in anterior composite restorations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 8:673-682.
68. Northeast SE, van Noort R. Surface characteristics of finished posterior composite resins. Dent Mater 1988; 4:278-288.
69. Pratten DH, Johnson GH. An evaluation of finishing instruments for an anterior and a posterior composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 60:154-158.
70. Dodge WW, Dale RA, Cooley RL, et al. Comparison of wet and dry finishing resin composite with aluminum oxide discs. Dent Mater 1991; 7:18-20.
71. Dickinson GL, Leinfielder KF. Assessing the long-term effect of a surface penetrating sealant. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:68-72.
72. Torstenson B, Brannstrom M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical investigation of dental adhesive systems. Part I. In vivo study. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 55:157-163.
73. Kawai K, Leinfelder KF. Effect of surface-penetrating sealant on the composite wear. Dent Mater 1993; 9:108-113.
74. Barone-Smith CE, Dickens SH. Effect of surface sealing on the microleakage of bonded restorations. J Dent Res 1999; 155. (Abstr)