One-year clinical evaluation of five single-step self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions

Dental Materials Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 14-20

  Kurokawa, Hiroyasu ^a   Miyazaki, Masashi ^a   Takamizawa, Toshiki ^a   Rikuta, Akitomo ^a   Tsubota, Keishi ^a   Uekusa, Satoshi ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cervical lesion; Clinical study; Single step system

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN CEMENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH EROSION;

EID: 34248519225     PISSN: 02874547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4012/dmj.26.14     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28:215-235.
2. Sasakawa W, Nakaoki Y, Nagano F, Horiuchi S, Ikeda T, Tanaka T, Noda M, Inoue S, Sano H, Sidhu SK. Micro-shear bond strength of five single-step adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J 2005; 24:617-627.
3. Asaka Y, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Tsubota K, Moore BK. Influence of delayed placement of composites over cured adhesives on dentin bond strength of single-application self-etch systems. Oper Dent 2006; 31:18-24.
4. Koyuturk AE, Sengun A, Ozer F, Sener Y, Gokalp A. Shear bond strengths of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin on the gingival wall. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:59-65.
5. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31:117-123.
6. Bartlett DW, Shah P. A critical review of noncarious cervical (wear) lesions and the role of abfraction, erosion, and abrasion. J Dent Res 2006; 85:306-312.
7. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 2006; 37:139-144.
8. Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62:82-86.
9. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent 2001; 29:317-324.
10. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J 2005; 24:1-13.
11. Han L, Cruz E, Fukushima M, Okamoto A, Okiji T. An ultrastructural analysis of the prototype single-step adhesive applied on enamel and dentin surfaces. Dent Mater J 2004; 23:321-328.
12. Hayakawa T, Kikutake-Sugiyama K, Fukushima T, Nemoto K. Development of self-etching primer adhesive in all-in-one bonding system. Dent Mater J 2005; 24:251-256.
13. Chiba Y, Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Moore BK. Effect of air-drying time of single-application self-etch adhesives on dentin bond strength. Oper Dent 2006; 31:233-239.
14. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials, San Francisco: US Public Health Service Publ. No. 790-244, USGPO, 1971.
15. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H, Hayashi Y. Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 2006; 34:97-105.
16. Wattanawongpitak N, Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effect of bonding system and composite type on adaptation of different C-factor restorations. Dent Mater J 2006; 25:45-50.
17. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Enamel microcracks produced around restorations with flowable composites. Dent Mater J 2005; 24:83-91.
18. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Water absorption, dimensional change and radial pressure in resin matrix dental restorative materials. Biomaterials 2004; 25:4001-4007.
19. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Patra AK, Cohen RE. An assessment of stress analyses in the theory of abfraction. Biomed Mater Eng 2004; 14:311-321.
20. Toledano M, Osorio R, Albaladejo A, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of cyclic loading on the microtensile bond strengths of total-etch and self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2006; 31:25-32.
21. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27:88-94.
22. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30:371-382.
23. Yoshida E, Uno S. Voids formation along the bonding interface between a smeared dentin surface and all-in-one adhesives. Dent Mater J 2004; 23:643-649.
24. Söderholm KJ. Correlation of in vivo and in vitro performance of adhesive restorative materials: a report of the ASC MD156 Task Group on Test Methods for the Adhesion of Restorative Materials. Dent Mater 1991; 7:74-83.
25. Yamauti M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Otsuki M, Tagami J. Microhardness and Young's modulus of a bonding resin cured with different curing units. Dent Mater J 2004; 23:457-466.
26. Ericson D, Kidd E, McComb D, Mjör I, Noack MJ. Minimally invasive dentistry - concepts and techniques in cariology. Oral Health Prev Dent 2003; 1:59-72.
27. Murdoch-Kinch CA, McLean ME. Minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134:87-95.