Clinical evaluation of flowable resins in non-carious cervical lesions: Two-year results

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 313-321

  Çelik, Çigdem ^a,c   Özgünaltay, Gül ^b   Attar, Nuray ^b  

^a BASKENT UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ELASTICITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

ADULT; AGED; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RHEOLOGY; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

EID: 34547435700     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-93     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Smith BG & Knight JK (1984) A comparison of patterns of tooth wear with aetiological factors British Dental Journal 157(1) 16-19.
2. Bader JD, Levitch LC, Shugars DA, Heymann HO & McClure F (1993) How dentists classified and treated non-carious cervical lesions Journal of the American Dental Association 124(5) 46-54.
3. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA & Heymann HO (1994) Non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 22(4) 195-207.
4. Imfeld T (1996) Dental erosion. Definitions, classification and links European Journal of Oral Science 104(2) 151-155.
5. Smith BG, Bartlett DW & Robb ND (1997) The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 78(4) 367-372.
6. Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ & Wilson NH (1999) The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion International Dental Journal 49(3) 139-143.
7. King PA (1999) Adhesive techniques British Dental Journal 186(7) 321-326.
8. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ & Cohen RE (2003) Tooth wear: Attrition, erosion and abrasion Quintessence International 34(6) 435-446.
9. Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS & Cohen RE (2003) Non-carious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation Journal of the American Dental Association 134(7) 845-850.
10. Grippo JO (1992) Non-carious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 4(Supplement) 55-64.
11. Gillam DG, Newman HN, Bulman JS & Davies EH (1992) Dentifrice abrasivity and cervical dentinal hypersensitivity. Results 12 weeks following cessation of 8 weeks' supervised use Journal of Periodontology 63(1) 7-12.
12. Markowitz K (1993) Tooth sensitivity: Mechanisms and management Compendium 14(8) 1032, 1034, passim; quiz 1046.
13. Leinfelder KF (1994) Restoration of abfracted lesions Compendium 15(11) 1396-1400.
14. Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Gladys S, Braem M & Vanherle G (1996) Restorative therapy for erosive lesions European Journal of Oral Science 104(2) 229-240.
15. Meurman JH & Sorvari R (2000) Interplay of erosion, attrition and abrasion in tooth wear and possible approaches to prevention In: Addy M, Emberry G, Edgar WM, Orchardson R (eds) Tooth Wear and Sensitivity Martin Dunitz Ltd London 172-180.
16. Holbrook WP, Arnadottir IB & Kay EJ (2003) Prevention. Part 3: Prevention of tooth wear British Dental Journal 195(2) 75-81.
17. Schwartz JL, Anderson MH & Pelleu GB Jr (1990) Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique Operative Dentistry 15(5) 186-192.
18. Attin T, Vataschki M & Hellwig E (1996) Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials Quintessence International 27(3) 203-209.
19. el-Kalla IH & García-Godoy F (1999) Mechanical properties of compomer materials Operative Dentistry 24(1) 2-8.
20. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH & Hinkel R (2000) Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: A 24-month follow-up study Operative Dentistry 25(4) 251-258.
21. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne S, Wilder AD, Sluder TB & Brunson WD (1991) Examining tooth flexure effects on cervical restoration: A two-year clinical study Journal of the American Dental Association 122(5) 41-47.
22. Kemp-Scholte CM & Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility Journal of Dental Research 69(6) 1240-1243.
23. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P & Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites Journal of the American Dental Association 129(5) 567-577.
24. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B & Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives Dental Materials 15(2) 128-137.
25. Unterbrink GL & Liebenberg WH (1999) Flowable resin composites as "filled adhesives": Literature review and clinical recommendations Quintessence International 30(4) 249-257.
26. Fortin D & Vargas MA (2000) The spectrum of composites: New techniques and materials Journal of the American Dental Association 131(Supplement) 26S-30S.
27. Wakefield CW & Kofford KR (2001) Advances in restorative materials Dental Clinics of North America 45(1) 7-29.
28. Roberson TM, Heymann HO & Ritter AV (2002) Introduction to composite restorations In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ (eds) Sturdevant's The Art and Science of Operative Dentistry TV Edition Mosby Inc St Louis, MO 470-550.
29. Albers HF (2002) Resins in: Tooth-colored Restoratives: Principles and Techniques IX Edition BC Decker Inc Hamilton/London 111-125.
30. Moon PC, Tabassian MS & Culbreath TE (2002) Flow characteristics and film thickness of flowable resin composites Operative Dentistry 27(3) 248-253.
31. Cvar JF & Ryge G (1971) Criteria for the Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials US Public Health Service Publication No 790-244 San Francisco: Government Printing Office.
32. Baratieri LN, Canabarro S, Lopes GC & Ritter AV (2003) Effect of resin viscosity and enamel beveling on the clinical performance of Class V composite restorations: Three-year results Operative Dentistry 28(5) 482-487.
33. Brackett WW, Dib A, Brackett MG, Reyes AA & Estrada BE (2003) Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations Operative Dentistry 28(5) 477-481.
34. Powell LV, Johnson GH & Gordon GE (1995) Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations Operative Dentistry 20(1) 7-13.
35. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1996) Three-year clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions Quintessence International 27(11) 775-784.
36. Mccoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X & Johnson GH (1998) Clinical success of Class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention Journal of the American Dental Association 129(5) 593-599.
37. Browning WD, Brackett WW & Gilpatrick RO (2000) Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in non-carious Class V lesions Operative Dentistry 25(1) 46-50.
38. American Dental Association-Council on Scientific Affairs American Dental Association program guidelines: Products for Dentin and Enamel Adhesive Materials, June 2001 (available at: www.ada.org).
39. Özgünaltay G & Önen A (2002) Three-year clinical evaluation of a resin modified glass-ionomer cement and a composite resin in non-carious Class V lesions Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29(11) 1037-1041.
40. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1993) Evaluation of two dentin adhesives in cervical lesions Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 70(4) 308-314.
41. Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M & De Stefano Dorigo E (2000) Cervical compomer restorations: The role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation Operative Dentistry 25(5) 382-387.
42. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN & Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in non-carious cervical lesions The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(4) 323-332.
43. Attar N, Tam LE & McComb D (2003) Flow, strength, stiffness and radiopacity of flowable resin composites Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 69(8) 516-521.
44. Oberholzer TG, Pameijer CH, Grobler SR & Rossouw RJ (2003) The effect of different power densities and method of exposure on the marginal adaptation of four light-cured dental restorative materials Biomaterials 24(20) 3593-3598.
45. St Germain H, Swartz ML, Phillips RW, Moore BK & Roberts TA (1985) Properties of microfilled composite resins as influenced by filler content Journal of Dental Research 64(2) 155-160.
46. van der Veen HJ, Pilon HF & Henry PP (1989) Clinical performance of one microfilled and two hybrid anterior composite resins Quintessence International 20(8) 547-550.
47. Smales RJ & Gerke DC (1992) Clinical evaluation of light-cured anterior resin composites over periods of up to 4 years American Journal of Dentistry 5(4) 208-212.
48. Reusens B, D'hoore W & Vreven J (1999) In vivo comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid minifilled composite resin in Class III restorations: 2-year follow-up Clinical Oral Investigations 3(2) 62-69.
49. Geitel B, Kwiatkowski R, Zimmer S, Barthel CR, Roulet JF & Jahn KR (2004) Clinically controlled study on the quality of Class III, IV and V composite restorations after two years Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 6(3) 247-253.
50. Demirci M, Ersev H, Topcubasi M & Ucok M (2005) Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V carious lesions: 3-year results Dental Materials Journal 24(3) 321-327.
51. Maneenut C & Tyas MJ (1995) Clinical evaluation of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative cements in cervical "abrasion" lesions: One-year results Quintessence International 26(10) 739-743.
52. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (1998) Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervical Class-V lesions Dental Materials 14(4) 294-306.
53. Browning WD & Dennison JB (1996) A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations Operative Dentistry 21(4) 160-166.
54. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V & Vanherle G (1986) The impact of composite structure on its elastic response Journal of Dental Research 65(5) 648-653.
55. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP & Vanherle G (1992) A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics Dental Materials 8(5) 310-319.
56. Lambrechts P, Ameye C & Vanherle G (1982) Conventional and microfilled composite resins, Part II: Chip fracture Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 48(5) 527-538.
57. Ermis RB (2002) Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions Quintessence International 33(7) 542-548.
58. Onal B & Pamir T (2005) The two-year clinical performance of esthetic restorative materials in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of the American Dental Association 136(11) 1547-1555.