Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 475-479

  Aguiar, F H B ^a,b   Santos, A J S ^a   Groppo, F C ^a   Lovadino, J R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILTEK Z250; RESIN; SUREFIL PACKABLE COMPOSITE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL SURGERY; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH DISEASE; VISCOSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; MATERIALS TESTING; MOLAR; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VISCOSITY;

EID: 0036730531     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Burgess JO, De Goes M, Walker R & Ripps AH (1999) An evaluation of four light-curing units comparing soft and hard curing Practice Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 11(1) 125-132.
2. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M & Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerization contraction: The influence of stress development versus stress relief Operative Dentistry 21(1) 17-24.
3. de Magalhães CS, Serra MC & Rodrigues AL Jr (1999), Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials Quintessence International 30(2) 117-121.
4. Douglas WH & Zakariasen KL (1981) Volumetric assessment of apical leakage utilizing a spectrophotometic dye-recovery method Journal of Dental Research 60 Abstract #512 p 438.
5. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration Journal of Dental Research 66(11) 1636-1639.
6. Fisbein S, Holan G, Grajower R & Fuks A (1988) The effect of VLC Scotchbond and an incremental filling technique on leakage around Class II composite restorations Journal of Dentistry for Children 55(1) 29-33.
7. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA & Märkl A (2000) Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations with and without "softstart- polymerization" Operative Dentistry 25(1) 26-32.
8. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJ, Saiku JM & Pelzner RB (1986) Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material, tested in vitro above and below the cementoenamel junction Quintessence International 17(1) 11-15.
9. Hassan K, Mante F, List G & Dhuru V (1987) A modified incremental filling technique for Class II composite restorations The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 58(2) 153-156.
10. Hyrabayashi S, Hood AA & Hirasawa T (1993) The extent of polymerization of Class II Light cured composite resin restorations: Effect of incremental placement technique, exposure time and heating for resin inlays Dental Materials Journal 12(2) 159-170.
11. Jedrychowsky JR, Bleier RG & Caputo AA (1998) Shrinkage stresses associated with incremental composite filing techniques Journal of Dentistry for Children 65(2) 111-115.
12. Kidd EA (1976) Microleakage: A review Journal of Dentistry 4(5) 199-206.
13. Köprulu H, Gürgan S & Önen A (1995) Marginal seal of a resin modified glass ionomer restorative material: An investigation of placement techniques Quintessence International 26 729-732.
14. Lambrechts P, Braem M & Vanherle G (1987) Buonocore Memorial Lecture Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives Operative Dentistry 12(2) 53-78.
15. Leinfelder KF & Prassad A (1998) a new condensable composite for the restoration of posterior teeth Dentistry Today 17 112-116.
16. Leinfelder KF, Bayne SC & Swift EJ Jr (1999) Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(5) 234-249.
17. Lutz E, Krejci I & Oldenburg TR (1986), Elimination of polymerization stress at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: A new restorative technique Quintessence International 17(12) 777-784.
18. Mangum FI Jr, Berry EA, DeSchepper E & Rieger MR (1994) Microleakage of incremental versus compression matrix bulk filling of cervical resin composite restorations General Dentistry 42 304-308.
19. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY & Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins Dental Materials 16(1) 33-40.
20. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M & Fusayama T (1983) Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test Journal of Dental Research 62 1076-1081.
21. Perry R, Kugel G & Leinfelder K (1999) One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 20(6) 544-550, 552-553.
22. Puckett A, Fitchie J, Hembree J Jr & Smith J (1992) The effect of incremental versus bulk fill techniques on the microleakage of composite resin using a glass ionomer liner Operative Dentistry 17(5) 186-191.
23. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH Jr & Puckett AS (1995) Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth Operative Dentistry 20 230-235.
24. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM & Denys FR (1990) Extracted human versus bovine teeth in laboratory studies American Journal of Dentistry 3 253-258.
25. Saunders WP (1988) The shear impact retentive strengths of four dentine bonding agents to human and bovine dentine Journal of Dentistry 16 233-238.
26. Sydney-Zax M, Mayor I & Deutsch D (1991) Carbonate content in developing human and bovine enamel Journal of Dental Research 70 913-916.
27. Tjan AH, Bergh BH & Linder C (1992) Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 67(1) 62-66.
28. Tyas MJ, Jones DW & Rizkalla AS (1998) The evaluation of resin composite consistency Dental Materials 14(6) 424-428.
29. Unterbrink GL & Muessner R (1995) Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems Journal of Dentistry 23(3) 183-189.
30. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M & Sakaguchi RL (1996) Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? Journal of Dental Research 75(3) 871-878.
31. Wieczkowski G Jr, Joynt RB, Klockowski R & Davis EL (1988) Effects of incremental versus bulk fill technique on resistance to cuspal fracture of teeth restored with posterior composites The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 60(3) 283-287.
32. Yap AU (2000) Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: Impact of cavity depth and exposure time Operative Dentistry 25(2) 113-120.