Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 11-15

  Burrow, M F ^a,b   Tyas, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b NONE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; CLEARFIL SE BOND; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 33846696111     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/06-50     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. van Dijken JW (2001) Durability of new restorative materials in Class III cavities Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3(1) 65-70.
2. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN & Roulet JF (2003) Five-year double-blind randomised clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and polyacid-modified resin in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(4) 323-332.
3. Burgess JO, Gallo JR, Ripps AH, Walker RS & Ireland EJ (2004) Clinical evaluation of four Class V restorative materials: 3-year recall American Journal of Dentistry 17(3) 147-150.
4. Randall RC & Wilson NHF (1999) Glass-ionomer restoratives: A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect Journal of Dental Research 78(2) 628-637.
5. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Vannerie G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235.
6. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Luduyt K, Lambrechts P & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: A systematic review of current clinical trials Dental Materials 21(9) 864-881.
7. Armstrong SR, Vargas MA, Fang O & Laffoon JE (2003) Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 5(1) 47-56.
8. van Dijken JW (2000) Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in Class V non-carious lesions Dental Materials 16(4) 285-291.
9. Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH & Mancl LA (2005) A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle adhesives Journal of the American Dental Association 136(3) 311-322.
10. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S & Suzuki K (2005) Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives Dental Materials Journal 24(1) 1-13.
11. Sano H, Kanemura N, Burrow MF, Inai N, Yamada T & Tagami J (1998) Effect of operator variability on dentin adhesion: students vs dentists Dental Materials Journal 17(1) 51-58.
12. Burrow MF & Tyas MJ (2005) Two-year clinical evaluation of One-Up Bond F in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 7(1) 65-68.
13. Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE & Mjör IA (2005) Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material American Journal of Dentistry 18(1) 45-49.
14. Kubo S, Kawasaki K, Yokota H & Hayashi Y (2006) Five-year clinical evaluation of two adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions Journal of Dentistry 34(2) 97-105.
15. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Van Meerbeek B (2005) Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions European Journal of Oral Sciences 113(6) 512-518.
16. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C & Meyer JM (2001) Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 55-61.
17. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Satoshi I, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Armstrong S, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2003) Microtensile bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin American Journal of Dentistry 16(6) 414-420.
18. Harnirattisai C, Inokoshi S, Shimada Y & Hosoda H (1993) Adhesive interface between resin and etched dentin of cervical erosion/abrasion lesions Operative Dentistry 18(4) 138-143.
19. Tay FR, Kwong SM, Itthagarun A, King NM, Yip HK, Moulding KM & Pashley DH (2000) Bonding of a self-etching primer to non-carious cervical sclerotic dentin: Interfacial ultrastructure and microtensile bond strength evaluation Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2(1) 9-28.
20. Thylstrup A & Rölling I (1975) The life table method in clinical dental research Community Dentist and Oral Epidemiology 3(1) 5-10.
21. Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH & Hickel R (2001) Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results American Journal of Dentistry 14(3) 153-156.
22. Smales RJ & Ng KK (2004) Longevity of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement and a polyacid-modified resin composite restoring non-carious cervical lesions in a general dental practice Australian Dental Journal 49(4) 196-200.
23. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Ibbetson R & Milia E (2004) Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents American Journal of Dentistry 17(4) 257-261.