A multipractice clinical evaluation of an ORMOCER restorative-2-year results

Quintessence International

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2007, Pages e306-e315

  Rosin, Michael ^a,b   Schwahn, Christian ^a   Kordaß, Bernd ^a   Konschake, Corinna ^c   Greese, Uwe ^c   Teichmann, Dirk ^c   Hartmann, Axel ^c   Meyer, Georg ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Resin composite; Restorative material; Self etching dental adhesive

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ORMOCER; SILANE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; LASER; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CERAMICS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; HUMANS; LASERS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SILANES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 34648843515     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Bream M, Cells JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8: 310-319.
2. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1994;25: 659-677.
3. Leinfelder K. Posterior composite resins: The materials and their clinical performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126: 663-676.
4. Roulet J-F. Benefits and disadvantages of toothcolored alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25: 459-473.
5. Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of lightcured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 33-40.
6. Abdallah AI, Alhadainy HA. 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 150-152.
7. Smith SI, Hein DK, Morrow TA, Cordner CI, Woods DR, Christensen RP. Two-year clinical performance of eight direct Class II restorative materials. J Dent Res 1996;75: 1907.
8. Perry R, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Setembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent 1997;45: 344-349.
9. Perry R, Kugel G, Aboushala A. Two-year clinical evaluation of a high-density posterior restorative. J Dent Res 2000;79: 163.
10. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE, Busato ALS. One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2000;26: 427-434.
11. Browning WD, Dennison JB. A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21: 160-166.
12. Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984;9: 57-68.
13. Mjör IA. Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent 1985;10: 88-92.
14. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odont Scand 1997;55: 58-63.
15. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odont Scand 1991;48: 305-311.
16. Wolter H, Glaubitt W, Rose K. Multifunctional (meth)acrylate alkoxysilanes-A new type of reactive compounds. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1992; 271: 719-724.
17. Wolter H, Storch W, Ott H. New inorganic/organic copolymers (ORMOCERs) for dental applications. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 1994;346: 143-149.
18. Degussa Dental. Scientific Documentation Definite®. Degussa Dental, Hanau, Germany, 1998.
19. Soltész U. Polymerisationsschrumpfung einiger neuerer Komposit-Füllungswerkstoffe. Zahnärztl Mit 1998;88: 52-54.
20. Soltész U. Polymerisationsschrumpfung von "Definite"-Korrekturwerte. Zahnärztl Mitt 1999;89: 58-59.
21. Rosin M, Urban AD, Gärtner C, Bernhardt O, Splieth C, Meyer G. Polymerization shrinkage-strain and microleakage in dentin-bordered cavities of chemically and light-cured restorative materials. Dent Mater 2002;18: 521-528.
22. Lutz F, Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: A critical analysis. J Esthet Dent 2000;12: 146-159.
23. Wataha JC, Rueggenberg FA, Lapp CA, et al. In-vitro cytotoxicity of resin-containing restorative materials after aging in artificial saliva. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3: 144-149.
24. Manhart J, Hollwich B, Mehl A, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. Randqualität von Ormocer- und Kompositfüllungen in Klasse-II-Kavitäten nach künstlicher Alterung [English abstract: Marginal integrity of Ormocer and composite restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999;54: 89-95.
25. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980;30: 347-358.
26. Roulet J-F, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 1989;3: 147-159.
27. Mehl A, Gloger W, Kunzelmann K-H, Hickel R. A new optical 3-D device for the detection of wear. J Dent Res 1997;76: 1799-1807.
28. Joynt RB, Davis EL, Schreier PJ. Rubber dam usage among practising dentists. Oper Dent 1989;14: 176-181.
29. Rosin M, Steffen H, Konschake C, et al. One-year evaluation of an ORMOCER® restorative-A multipractice clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2003;7: 20-26.
30. Oberländer H, Hiller KA, Thonemann B, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of packable composite resins in Class-II restorations. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5: 102-107.
31. Lopes LG, Cefaly DFG, Franco EB, Mondelli RFL, Lauris JRP, Navarro MFL. Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins. Clin Oral Invest 2002;6: 79-83.
32. Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigao J. Mikroleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999;12: 291-294.
33. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: An alternative concept for composite- to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24: 172-180.
34. Amaral CM, Hara AT, Pimenta LA, Rodrigues AL Jr. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14: 31-33.
35. Spohr AM, Conceicao EN, Pacheco JF. Tensile bond strength of four adhesive systems to dentin. Am J Dent 2001;14: 247-251.
36. Pontes DG, De Melo AT, Monnerat AF. Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quintessence Int 2002;33; 136-139.