Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 22, 2006, Pages 8396-8409

  Herzberg, Kristina ^a   Bashkirov, Vladimir I ^a,c   Rolfsmeier, Michael ^a,d   Haghnazari, Edwin ^a,e   McDonald, W Hayes ^b,f   Anderson, Scott ^b   Bashkirova, Elena V ^a,g   Yates III, John R ^b   Heyer, Wolf Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e SCIOS INC   (United States)

^f OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^g Novozymes Biotech Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD55 PROTEIN; SERINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE ARREST; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL GROWTH; CELL SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA REPLICATION FORK; DNA REPLICATION ORIGIN; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENOTOXICITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENOME; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-RAF; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SERINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 33750990221     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01317-06     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Bärtsch, S., L. E. Kang, and L. S. Symington. 2000. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1194-1205.
2. Bashkirov, V. I., E. V. Bashkirova, E. Haghnazari, and W. D. Heyer. 2003. Direct kinase-to-kinase signaling mediated by the FHA phosphoprotein recognition domain of the Dun1 DNA damage checkpoint kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1441-1452.
3. Bashkirov, V. I., K. Herzberg, E. Haghnazari, A. S. Vlasenko, and W. D. Heyer. 2006. DNA-damage induced phosphorylation of Rad55 protein as a sentinel for DNA damage checkpoint activation in S. cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 409:166-182.
4. Bashkirov, V. I., J. S. King, E. V. Bashkirova, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, and W. D. Heyer. 2000. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4393-4404.
5. Bianco, P. R., R. B. Tracy, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 1998. DNA strand exchange proteins: a biochemical and physical comparison. Front. Biosci. 3:570-603.
6. Binz, S. K., Y. Lao, D. F. Lowry, and M. F. Wold. 2003. The phosphorylation domain of the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA) modulates RPA-DNA interactions. J. Biol. Chem. 278:35584-35591.
7. Boddy, M. N., A. Lopez-Girona, P. Shanahan, H. Interthal, W. D. Heyer, and P. Russell. 2000. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:8758-8766.
8. Broomfield, S., T. Hryciw, and W. Xiao. 2001. DNA postreplication repair and mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 486:167-184.
9. Brush, G. S., and T. J. Kelly. 2000. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28:3725-3732.
10. Carr, A. M. 2002. DNA structure dependent checkpoints as regulators of DNA repair. DNA Repair 1:983-994.
11. Carty, M. P., M. Zernikkobak, S. Mcgrath, and K. Dixon. 1994. UV light-induced DNA synthesis arrest in HeLa cells is associated with changes in phosphorylation of human single-stranded DNA-binding protein. EMBO J. 13:2114-2123.
12. Caspari, T., J. M. Murray, and A. M. Carr. 2002. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev. 16:1195-1208.
13. Cejka, P., V. Vondrejs, and Z. Storchova. 2001. Dissection of the functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 postreplicative repair group in mutagenesis and UV sensitivity. Genetics 159:953-963.
14. Chen, G., S. S. F. Yuan, W. Liu, Y. Xu, K. Trujillo, B. W. Song, F. Cong, S. P. Goff, Y. Wu, R. Arlinghaus, D. Baltimore, P. J. Gasser, M. S. Park, P. Sung, and E. Lee. 1999. Radiation-induced assembly of Rad51 and Rad52 recombination complex requires ATM and c-Abl. J. Biol. Chem. 274:12748-12752.
15. Clerici, M., V. Baldo, D. Mantiero, F. Lottersberger, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2004. A Tell/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:10126-10144.
16. Clever, B., H. Interthal, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, J. King, M. Sigrist, and W. D. Heyer. 1997. Recombinational repair in yeast: functional interactions between Rad51 and Rad54 proteins. EMBO J. 16:2535-2544.
17. D'Amours, D., and S. P. Jackson. 2001. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15:2238-2249.
18. Desany, B., A. A. Alcasabas, J. B. Bachant, and S. J. Elledge. 1998. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12:2956-2970.
19. Reference deleted.
20. Fortin, G. S., and L. S. Symington. 2002. Mutations in yeast Rad51 that partially bypass the requirement for Rad55 and Rad57 in DNA repair by increasing the stability of Rad51-DNA complexes. EMBO J. 21:3160-3170.
21. Haghnazari, E., and W.-D. Heyer. 2004. The DNA damage checkpoints pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a DNA double stranded gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:4257-4268.
22. Hueijmakers, J. H. J. 2001. Genome maintenance mechanisms for preventing cancer. Nature 411:366-374.
23. Ira, G., A. Pellicioli, A. Balijja, X. Wang, S. Fiorani, W. Carotenuto, G. Liberi, D. Bressan, L. H. Wan, N. M. Hollingsworth, J. E. Haber, and M. Foiani. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-1017.
24. Jeggo, P. A., A. M. Carr, and A. R. Lehmann. 1998. Splitting the ATM: distinct repair and checkpoint defects in ataxia-telangiectasia. Trends Genet. 14:312-316.
25. Johnson, R. D., and L. S. Symington. 1995. Functional differences and interactions among the putative RecA homologs Rad51, Rad55, and Rad57. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15:4843-4850.
26. Kanoh, Y., K. Tamai, and K. Shirahige. 2006. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks. Gene 377:88-95.
27. Kantake, N., T. Sugiyama, R. D. Kolodner, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2003. The recombination-deficient mutant RPA (rfa1-t11) is displaced slowly from single-stranded DNA by Rad51 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 278:23410-23417.
28. Kim, H. S., and S. J. Brill. 2001. Rfc4 interacts with Rpa1 and is required for both DNA replication and DNA damage checkpoints in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3725-3737.
29. Kolodner, R. D., C. D. Putnam, and K. Myung. 2002. Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297:552-557.
30. Krejci, L., S. Van Komen, Y. Li, J. Villemain, M. S. Reddy, H. Klein, T. Ellenberger, and P. Sung. 2003. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423:305-309.
31. Krogh, B. O., and L. S. Symingtun. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:233-271.
32. Kuhne, M., E. Riballo, N. Rief, K. Ruthkamm, P. A. Jeggo, and M. Lobrich. 2004. A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res. 64:500-508.
33. 2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399-409.
34. Lee, S. E., A. Pellicioli, M. B. Vaze, N. Sugawara, A. Malkova, M. Foiani, and J. E. Haber. 2003. Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:8913-8923.
35. Lee, S.-J., M. F. Schwartz, J. K. Duong, and D. F. Stern. 2003. Rad53 phosphorylation site clusters are important for Rad53 regulation and signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:6300-6314.
36. Liberi, G., I. Chiolo, A. Pellicioli, M. Lopes, P. Plevani, M. Muzi-Falconi, and M. Foiani. 2000. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19:5027-5038.
37. Liefshitz, B., R. Steinlauf, A. Friedl, F. Eckardt-Schupp, and M. Kupiec. 1998. Genetic interactions between mutants of the 'error-prone' repair group of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their effect on recombination and mutagenesis. Mutat. Res. 407:135-145.
38. Lim, D. S., S. T. Kim, B. Xu, R. S. Maser, J. Y. Lin, J. H. J. Petrini, and M. B. Kastan. 2000. ATM phosphorylates p95/nbs1 in an S-phase checkpoint pathway. Nature 404:613-617.
39. Liu, V. F., and D. T. Weaver. 1993. The ionizing radiation-induced replication protein A phosphorylation response differs between ataxia telangiectasia and normal human cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:7222-7231.
40. Liu, Y. L., J. Y. Masson, R. Shah, P. O'Regan, and S. C. West. 2004. RAD51C is required for Holliday junction processing in mammalian cells. Science 303:243-246.
41. Lovett, S. T., and R. K. Mortimer. 1987. Characterization of null mutants of the RAD55 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects of temperature, osmotic strength and mating type. Genetics 116:547-553.
42. MacCoss, M. J., W. H. McDonald, A. Saraf, R. Sadygov, J. M. Clark, J. J. Tasto, K. L. Gould, D. Welters, M. Washburn, A. Weiss, J. I. Clark, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Shotgun identification of protein modifications from protein complexes and lens tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:7900-7905.
43. Mazin, A. V., C. J. Bornarth, J. A. Solinger, W.-D. Heyer, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 2000. Rad54 protein is targeted to pairing loci by the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament. Mol. Cell 6:583-592.
44. McDonald, W. H., R. Ohi, D. Miyamoto, T. J. Mitchison, and J. R. Yates III. 2002. Comparison of three directly coupled HPLC MS/MS strategies for identification of proteins from complex mixtures: single-dimension LC-MS/MS, 2-phase MudPIT, and 3-phase MudPIT. Int. J. Mass Spectrometry 219:245-251.
45. Melo, J., and D. Toczyski. 2002. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:237-245.
46. Michel, B., G. Grompone, M. J. Flores, and V. Bidnenko. 2004. Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:12783-12788.
47. Minesinger, B. K., and S. Jinks-Robertson. 2005. Roles of RAD6 epistasis group members in spontaneous Polzeta-dependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169:1939-1955.
48. Morrison, C., E. Sonoda, N. Takao, A. Shinohara, K. Yamamoto, and S. Takeda. 2000. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J. 19:463-471.
49. Myung, K., C. Chen, and R. D. Kolodner. 2001. Multiple pathways cooperate in the suppression of genome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 411:1073-1076.
50. New, J. H., T. Sugiyama, E. Zaitseva, and S. C. Kowalczykowski. 1998. Rad52 protein stimulates DNA strand exchange by Rad51 and replication protein A. Nature 391:407-410.
51. Norbury, C. J., and B. Zhivotovsky. 2004. DNA damage-induced apoptosis. Oncogene 23:2797-2808.
52. Nyberg, K. A., R. J. Michelson, C. W. Putnam, and T. A. Weinert. 2002. Toward maintaining the genome: DNA damage and replication checkpoints. Annu. Rev. Genet. 36:617-656.
53. Osborn, A. J., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17:1755-1767.
54. Osborn, A. J., S. J. Elledge, and L. Zou. 2002. Checking on the fork: the DNA-replication stress-response pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 12:509-516.
55. Papouli, E., S. H. Chen, A. A. Davies, D. Huttner, L. Krejci, P. Sung, and H. D. Ulrich. 2005. Crosstalk between SUMO and ubiquitin on PCNA is mediated by recruitment of the helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19:123-133.
56. Paulovich, A. G., and L. H. Hartwell. 1995. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell 82:841-847.
57. 2/M arrest. Mol. Cell 7:293-300.
58. Pfander, B., G. L. Moldovan, M. Sacher, C. Hoege, and S. Jentsch. 2005. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436:428-433.
59. Raghuraman, M. K., E. A. Winzeler, D. Collingwood, S. Hunt, L. Wodicka, A. Conway, D. J. Lockhart, R. W. Davis, B. J. Brewer, and W. J. Fangman. 2001. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294:115-121.
60. Schwartz, M. F., J. K. Duong, Z. X. Sun, J. S. Morrow, D. Pradhan, and D. F. Stern. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055-1065.
61. Sorensen, C. S., L. T. Hansen, J. Dziegielewski, R. G. Syljuasen, C. Lundin, J. Bartek, and T. Helleday. 2005. The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homolgous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:195-201.
62. Sugawara, N., X. Wang, and J. E. Haber. 2003. In vivo roles of Rad52, Rad54, and Rad55 proteins in Rad51-mediated recombination. Mol. Cell 12:209-219.
63. Sung, P. 1997. Function of yeast Rad52 protein as a mediator between replication protein A and the Rad51 recombinase. J. Biol. Chem. 272:28194-28197.
64. Sung, P. 1997. Yeast Rad55 and Rad57 proteins form a heterodimer that functions with replication protein A to promote DNA strand exchange by Rad51 recombinase. Genes Dev. 11:1111-1121.
65. Tercero, J. A., and J. F. X. Diffley. 2001. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553-557.
66. Tercero, J. A., M. P. Longhese, and J. F. X. Diffley. 2003. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11:1323-1336.
67. Umezu, K., N. Sugawara, C. Chen, J. E. Haber, and R. D. Kolodner. 1998. Genetic analysis of yeast RPA1 reveals its multiple functions in DNA metabolism. Genetics 148:989-1005.
68. Usui, T., H. Ogawa, and J. H. J. Petrini. 2001. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7:1255-1266.
69. Vassin, V. M., M. S. Wold, and J. A. Borowiec. 2004. Replication protein A (RPA) phosphorylation prevents RPA association with replication centers. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:1930-1943.
70. Veaute, X., J. Jeusset, C. Soustelle, S. C. Kowalczykowski, E. Le Cam, and F. Fabre. 2003. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423:309-312.
71. Wahl, G. M., and A. M. Carr. 2001. The evolution of diverse biological responses to DNA damage: insights from yeast and p53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:E277-E286.
72. Wang, X., and J. E. Haber. 2004. Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol. 2:104-112.
73. Weichselbaum, R. R., J. Nove, and J. B. Little. 1978. Deficient recovery from potentially lethal radiation damage in ataxia telangiectasia and xeroderma pigmentosum. Nature 271:261-262.
74. Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241:317-322.
75. Wold, M. S. 1997. Replication protein A: a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding protein required for eukaryotic DNA metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 66:61-92.
76. Wolner, B., S. van Komen, P. Sung, and C. L. Peterson. 2003. Recruitment of the recombinational repair machinery to a DNA double-strand break in yeast. Mol. Cell 12:221-232.
77. Wu, X. H., V. Ranganathan, D. S. Weisman, W. F. Heine, D. N. Ciccone, T. B. O'Neill, K. E. Crick, K. A. Pierce, W. S. Lane, G. Rathbum, D. M. Livingston, and D. T. Weaver. 2000. ATM phosphorylation of Nijmegen breakage syndrome protein is required in a DNA damage response. Nature 405:477-482.
78. Xiao, W., B. L. Chow, S. Broomfield, and M. Hanna. 2000. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. Genetics 155:1633-1641.
79. Xiao, W., B. L. Chow, and L. Rathgeber. 1996. The repair of DNA methylation damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 30:461-468.
80. Yuan, Z. M., Y. Y. Huang, T. Ishiko, S. Nakada, T. Utsugisawa, S. Kharbanda, R. Wang, P. Sung, A. Shinohara, R. Weichselbaum, and D. Kufe. 1998. Regulation of Rad51 function by c-Abl in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 273:3799-3802.
81. Zhao, S., Y. C. Weng, S. S. Yuan, Y. T. Lin, H. C. Hsu, S. C. Lin, E. Gerbino, M. H. Song, M. Z. Zdzienicka, R. A. Gatti, J. W. Shay, Y. Ziv, Y. Shiloh, and E. Y. Lee. 2000. Functional link between ataxia-telangiectasia and Nijmegen breakage syndrome gene products. Nature 405:473-477.
82. Zhou, B. B. S., and S. J. Elledge. 2000. The DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective. Nature 408:433-439.
83. Zou, L., and S. J. Elledge. 2003. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300:1542-1548.