An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: A review of the literature

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 433-442

  Sadowsky, Steven Judd ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; POLYURETHAN; RESIN;

CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; REVIEW; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL VENEERS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES;

EID: 33845476725     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.018     Document Type: Review

References (201)

1. Stavridakis M.M., Krejci I., and Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning. Oper Dent 6 (2005) 747-757
2. Gregoire G., and Millas A. Microscopic evaluation of dentin interface obtained with 10 contemporary self-etching systems: Correlation with their pH. Oper Dent 4 (2005) 481-491
3. Spencer P., Wang Y., and Katz J.L. Identification of collagen encapsulation at the dentin/adhesive interface. J Adhes Dent 6 (2004) 91-95
4. Haj-Ali R., Walker M., Williams K., Wang Y., and Spenser P. Histomorphologic characterization of noncarious and caries-affected dentin/adhesive interfaces. J Prosthodont 15 (2006) 82-88
5. Clarkson T.W. The three modern faces of mercury. Environ Health Perspect 110 (2002) 11-23
6. Mjor I.A. Biological side effects to materials used in dentistry. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44 (1999) 146-149
7. Dodes J.E. The amalgam controversy: an evidence-based analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 132 (2001) 348-356
8. Wahl M.J. Amalgam-resurrection and redemption. Part 1: the clinical and legal mythology of anti-amalgam. Quintessence Int 32 (2001) 525-535
9. Wahl M.J. Amalgam-resurrection and redemption. Part 2: the medical mythology of anti-amalgam. Quintessence Int 32 (2001) 696-710
10. Osborne J.W. Dental amalgam and mercury vapor release. Adv Dent Res 6 (1992) 135-138
11. Osborne J.W. Safety of dental amalgam. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 377-388
12. Horsted-Bindslev P. Amalgam toxicity-environmental and occupational hazards. J Dent 32 (2004) 359-365
13. van Zyl I. Mercury amalgam safety: a review. J Mich Dent Assoc 81 (1999) 40-52
14. Eggleston D.W., and Nylander M. Correlation of dental amalgam with mercury in brain tissue. J Prosthet Dent 58 (1987) 704-707
15. Zimmer H., Ludwig H., Bader M., Bailer J., Eickholz P., Staehle H.J., et al. Determination of mercury in blood, urine, and saliva for biologic monitoring of an exposure from amalgam fillings in a group with self-reported adverse health effects. Int J Hyg Environ Health 205 (2002) 205-211
16. Mutter J., Naumann J., Sadaghiani C., Walach H., and Drasch G. Amalgam studies: disregarding basic principles of mercury toxicity. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207 (2004) 391-397
17. Melchart D., Wuhr E., Weidenhammer W., and Kremers L. A multicenter survey of amalgam fillings and subjective complaints in non-selected patients in the dental practice. Eur J Oral Sci 106 (1998) 770-777
18. DeRouen T.A., Martin M.D., Leroux B.G., Townes B.D., Woods J.S., Leitao J., et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 295 (2006) 1784-1792
19. Richie K.A., Gilmour W.H., Macdonald E.B., Burke F.J., McGowan D.A., Dale I.M., et al. Health and neuropsychological functioning of dentists exposed to mercury. Occup Environ Med 59 (2002) 287-293
20. Yip H.K., Li D.K., and Yau D.C. Dental amalgam and human health. Int Dent J 53 (2003) 464-468
21. Joshi A., Douglass C.W., Kim H.D., Joshipura K.J., Park M.C., Rimm E.B., et al. The relationship between amalgam restorations in male dentists and nondental health professionals. J Public Health Dent 63 (2003) 52-60
22. Kelly J.R. Evidence-based decision making: guide to reading the dental materials literature. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 152-160
23. Bogacki R.E., Hunt R.J., del Aguila M., and Smith W.R. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using insurance claims database. Oper Dent 27 (2002) 488-492
24. Akerboom H.B., Advokaat J.G., Van Amerongen W.E., and Borgmeirjer P.J. Long-term evaluation and restoration of amalgam restorations. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 21 (1993) 45-48
25. Mjor I.A. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 55 (1997) 58-63
26. Anusavice K.J. Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. (2003), Elsevier, St Louis p. 431-8, 539, 702
27. Swartz M.L., and Phillips R.W. In vitro studies on the marginal leakage of restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 62 (1961) 141-151
28. Letzel H., van't Hof M.A., Vrijhoef M.M., Marshall Jr. G.W., and Marshall S.J. A controlled study of amalgam restorations: survival, failure, and causes of failure. Dent Mater 5 (1989) 115-121
29. Plasmans P.J., Cruegers N.H., and Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 453-460
30. Stein P.S., Sullivan J., Haubenreich J.E., and Osborne P.B. Composite resin in medicine and dentistry. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 16 (2005) 641-654
31. Lutz F., and Krejci I. Amalgam substitutes: a critical analysis. J Esthet Dent 12 (2000) 146-159
32. Choi K.K., Ryu G.J., Choi S.M., Lee M.J., Park S.J., and Ferracane J.L. Effects of cavity configuration on composite restoration. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 462-469
33. Opdam N.J., Roeters F.J., Feilzer A.J., and Verdonschot E.H. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26 (1998) 555-562
34. Guertsen W. Biocompatibility of resin-modified filling materials. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 11 (2000) 333-355
35. Al-Hiyasat A.S., Darmani H., and Milhem M.M. Cytotoxicity evaluation of dental resin composites and their flowable derivatives. Clin Oral Investig 9 (2005) 21-25
36. Mair L.H. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int 29 (1998) 483-490
37. el-Mowafy O.M., Lewis D.W., Benmergui C., and Levinton C. Meta analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 22 (1994) 33-43
38. Terry D.A. Dimensions of color: creating high diffusion layers with composite resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 24 (2003) 3-13
39. Sarac D., Sarac Y.S., Kulunk S., Ural C., and Kulunk T. The effect of polishing techniques on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 96 (2006) 33-40
40. Mjor I.A., Dahl J.E., and Moorhead J.E. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 58 (2000) 97-101
41. Ritter A.V. Direct resin-based composites: current recommendations for optimal clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 26 (2005) 481-490
42. Lopes G.C., Vieira L.C., and Araujo E. Direct composite resin restorations: a review of some clinical procedures to achieve predictable results in posterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 19-32
43. Gaengler P., Hoyer I., and Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. J Adhes Dent 3 (2001) 183-194
44. Yap A.U.J., Tan C.H., and Chung S.M. Wear behavior of new composite restoratives. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 269-274
45. van Dijken J.W. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow-up. J Dent 28 (2000) 299-306
46. Manhart J., Chen H.Y., Hamm G., and Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 481-508
47. Badra V.V., Faraoni J.J., Ramos R.P., and Palma-Dibb R.G. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 213-219
48. Bedran de Castro A.K., Pimenta L.A., Amaral C.M., and Ambrosano G.M. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems. J Esthet Restor Dent 14 (2002) 107-114
49. Santini A., Plasschaert A.J., and Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 132-136
50. Poskus L.T., Placido E., and Cardoso P.E. Influence of adhesive system and placement on microleakage of resin-based restorations. J Adhes Dent 6 (2004) 227-232
51. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 60-69
52. Campos P.E., Sampaio Filho H.R., and Barceleiro Mde O. Occlusal loading evaluation in the cervical integrity of Class II cavities filled with composite. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 727-732
53. Lindberg A., van Dijken J.W., and Horstedt P. In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without flowable resin composite liner. Clin Oral Investig 9 (2005) 77-83
54. Roberson T.M., Heymann H.O., and Swift E.J. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 5th ed. (2006), Elsevier, St. Louis p. 495-526
55. Willershausen B., Kottgen C., and Ernst C.P. The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva. Eur J Med Res 6 (2001) 433-439
56. Zalkind M.M., Keisar O., Ever-Hadani P., Grinberg R., and Seala M.N. Accumulation of Streptococcus mutans on light-cured composites and amalgam: an in vitro study. J Esthet Dent 10 (1998) 187-190
57. Santerre J.P., Shajii L., and Leung B.W. Relation of dental composite formulations to their degradation and the release of hydrolyzed polymeric-resin-derived products. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 12 (2001) 136-151
58. Hansel C., Layhausen G., Mai U.E., and Geurtsen W. Effects of various resin composite (co)monomers and extracts on two caries associated micro-organisms in vitro. J Dent Res 77 (1998) 60-67
59. Burke F.M., Ray N.J., and McConnell R.J. Fluoride-containing restorative materials. Int Dent J 56 (2006) 33-43
60. Geurtsen W., and Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 25 (1997) 229-232
61. Schneibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A., Manhart J., Kremers L., Kunzelmann K.H., and Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 82 (1999) 391-397
62. Poon E.C., Smales R.J., and Kip K.H. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years. J Am Dent Assoc 136 (2005) 1533-1540
63. Santini A., Ivanovic V., Ibbetson R., and Milia E. Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around Class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 128-135
64. Calheiros F.C., Sadek F.T., Braga R.R., and Cardodo P.E. Polymerization contraction stress of low-shrinkage composites and its correlation with microleakage in class V restorations. J Dent 32 (2004) 407-412
65. Tay F.R., and Pashley D.H. Resin bonding to cervical sclerotic dentin: a review. J Dent 32 (2004) 173-196
66. Yap A.U., Yap S.H., Teo C.K., and Ng J.J. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 100-104
67. Fortin D., and Vargas M.A. The spectrum of composites: new techniques and materials. J Am Dent Assoc 131 (2000) 26S-30S
68. Perry R., Kugel G., and Leinfelder K. One-year clinical evaluation of SureFil packable composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 30 (1999) 179-184
69. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Asscherickx K., Simon S., Abe Y., Lambrechts P., et al. Do condensable composites help to achieve better proximal contacts?. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 533-541
70. Roulet J.-F. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 25 (1997) 459-473
71. Leinfelder K. The enigma of dental amalgam. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 3-5
72. Strydom C. Handling protocol of posterior composites rubber dam. S Afr Dent J 60 (2005) 292-293
73. De Munck J., Vargas M., Iracki J., Van Landuyt K., Poitevin A., Lambrechts P., et al. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 39-49
74. Lutz F., and Krejei I. Resin composites in the post-amalgam age. Compend Contin Educ Dent 20 (1999) 1138-1148
75. Lopes G.C., Franke M., and Maia H.P. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 32-36
76. Bala O., Uctasli M.B., and Tuz M.A. Barcoll hardness of different resin-based composites cured by halogen or light emitting diode (LED). Oper Dent 30 (2005) 69-74
77. Alomari Q.D., and Mansour Y.F. Effect of LED curing modes on cusp deflection and hardness of composite restorations. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 684-689
78. Neo B.J., Soh M.S., Teo J.W., and Yap A.U. Effectiveness of composite cure associated with different light-curing regimes. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 671-675
79. Jung M., Hornung K., and Klimek J. Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo. Oper Dent 30 (2005) 139-146
80. Wassell R.W., Walls A.W., and McCabe J.F. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three year clinical results. Br Dent J 179 (1995) 343-349
81. Franz A., Konig F., Anglmayer M., Rausch-Fan X., Gille G., Rausch W.D., et al. Cytotoxic effects of packable and nonpackable dental composites. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 382-392
82. Spreafico R.C., Krejci I., and Dietschi D. Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo. J Dent 33 (2005) 499-507
83. Wendt Jr. S.L., and Leinfelder K.F. The clinical evaluation of heat-treated composite resin inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 120 (1990) 177-181
84. Kuijs R.H., Fennis W.M., Kreulen C.M., Roeters F.J., Creugers N.H., and Burgersdijk R.C. A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: efficiency and short-term effectiveness. Int J Prosthodont 19 (2006) 349-354
85. Pallesen U., and Qvist V. Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig 7 (2003) 71-79
86. Thordup M., Isidor F., and Horsted-Bindslev P. A prospective clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays: ten-year results. Quintessence Int 37 (2006) 139-144
87. Donly K.J., Jensen M.E., Triolo P., and Chan D. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay restorations and cast gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 30 (1999) 163-168
88. Kramer N., and Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 262-271
89. Fradeani M., Aquilano A., and Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 78 (1997) 346-353
90. Manhart J., Chen H.Y., Neuerer P., Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A., and Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 14 (2001) 95-99
91. Schulte A.G., Vocker A., and Reinhardt R. Longevity of ceramic inlays and onlays luted with a solely light-curing composite resin. J Dent 33 (2005) 433-442
92. Arnelund C.F., Johansson A., Ericson M., Hager P., and Fyrberg K.A. Five-year evaluation of two-resin-retained ceramic systems: a retrospective study in general practice setting. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 302-306
93. Molin M., and Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 54 (1996) 145-149
94. Molin M.K., and Karlsson S.L. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 13 (2000) 194-200
95. Fuzzi M., and Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent 1 (1999) 71-79
96. Ritter A.V., and Baratieri L.N. Ceramic restorations for posterior teeth: guidelines for the clinician. J Esthet Dent 11 (1999) 72-86
97. Meyer Jr. A., Cardoso L.C., Araujo E., and Baratieri L.N. Ceramic inlays and onlays: clinical procedures for predictable results. J Esthet Restor Dent 15 (2003) 338-351
98. Aberg C.H., van Dijken J.W., and Olofsson A.L. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer. Acta Odontol Scand 52 (1994) 140-149
99. Borges G.A., Sophr A.M., de Goes M.F., Sobrinho L.C., and Chan D.C. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 479-488
100. Sen D., Poyrazoglu E., Tuncelli B., and Goller G. Shear bond strength of resin luting cement to glass-infiltrated porous aluminum oxide cores. J Prosthet Dent 83 (2000) 210-215
101. Awliya W., Oden A., Yaman P., Dennison J.B., and Razzoog M.E. Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high purity alumina with various surface conditions. Acta Odontol Scand 56 (1998) 9-13
102. Seghi R.R., and Sorensen J.A. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 8 (1995) 239-246
103. Blatz M.B., Sadan A., and Kern M. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 89 (2003) 268-274
104. Soares C.J., Soares P.V., Pereira J.C., and Fonseca R.B. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 17 (2005) 224-235
105. Messer R.L., Lockwood P.E., Wataha J.C., Lewis J.B., Norris S., and Bouillaguet S. In vitro cytotoxicity of traditional versus contemporary ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 452-458
106. Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent 9 (2006) 11-22
107. Sjogren G., Molin M., and van Dijken J.W. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 241-246
108. Otto T., and De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: 10-year prospective clinical study of CEREC CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 122-128
109. Pallesen U., and van Dijken J.W. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the CEREC CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 108 (2000) 239-246
110. Martin N., and Jedynakiewicz N.M. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 54-61
111. Hickel R., and Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 3 (2001) 45-64
112. Fasbinder D.J., Dennison J.B., Heys D.R., and Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. J Amer Dent Assoc 136 (2005) 1714-1723
113. Gladys S., Van Meerbeek B., Inokoshi S., Willems G., Braem M., Lambrechts P., et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-colored inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 23 (1995) 329-338
114. Reiss B. Long-term clinical performance of CEREC restorations and the variables affecting treatment success. Compend Contin Educ Dent 22 (2001) 14-18
115. Reich S., and Hornberger H. The effect of multicolored machinable ceramics on the esthetics of all-ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 44-49
116. Darr A.H., and Jacobsen P.H. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 22 (1995) 43-47
117. Reich S.M., Wichmann M., Rinne H., and Shortall A. Clinical performance of large, all-ceramic CAD/CAM generated restorations after three years. J Am Dent Assoc 135 (2004) 605-612
118. Donovan T., Simonsen R.J., Guertin G., and Tucker R.V. Retrospective clinical evaluation of 1,314 cast gold restorations in service from 1 to 52 years. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 194-204
119. Fradeani M., Redemagni M., and Corrado M. Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation-a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 25 (2005) 9-17
120. Peumans M., De Munck J., Fieuws S., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G., and Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 6 (2004) 65-76
121. Friedman M.J. A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure-a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 19 (1998) 625-630
122. Dumfarht H., and Schaffer H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service. Part II: clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 13 (2000) 9-18
123. Shaini F.J., Shortall A.C., and Marquis P.M. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over as period of 6.5 years. J Oral Rehabil 24 (1997) 553-559
124. Magne P., and Douglas W.H. Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: intact versus veneered incisors. Quintessence Int 31 (2000) 5-18
125. Ho H.H., Chu F.C., and Stokes A.N. Fracture behavior of of human mandibular incisors following endodontic treatment and porcelain veneer restoration. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 260-264
126. Walls A.W. The use of adhesively retained all-porcelain veneers during management of fractured and worn anterior teeth. Part 2: clinical results after 5 years follow-up. Br Dent J 178 (1995) 337-340
127. Gibbs C.H., Mahan P.E., Mauderli A., Lundeen H.C., and Walsh E.K. Limits of human bite strength. J Prosthet Dent 56 (1986) 226-229
128. Castelnuovo J., Tjan A.H., Phillips K., Nichols J.I., and Kois J.C. Fracture load and mode failure of ceramic veneers with different preparations. J Prosthet Dent 83 (2000) 171-180
129. Magne P., Kwon K.R., Belser U.C., Hodges J.S., and Douglas W.H. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: a simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 327-334
130. Stappert C.F., Ozden U., Gerds T., and Strub J.R. Longevity and failure load of ceramic veneers with different preparation designs after exposure to masticatory simulation. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 132-139
131. Magne P., Versluis A., and Douglas W.H. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 335-344
132. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., and Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of literature. J Dent 28 (2000) 163-177
133. Christensen G.J. Has tooth structure been replaced?. J Am Dent Assoc 133 (2002) 103-105
134. Cherukara G.P., Davis G.R., Seymour K.G., Zou L., and Samarawickrama D.Y. Dentin exposure in tooth preparations for porcelain veneers: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 414-420
135. Atsu S.S., Aka P.S., Kucukesman H.C., Kilicarslan M.A., and Atakan C. Age-related changes in tooth enamel as measured by electron microscopy: implications for porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 336-341
136. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 17 (2005) 144-155
137. Magne P., and Douglas W.H. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 111-121
138. Paul S.J., and Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 17 (1997) 537-545
139. Sorensen J.A., Strutz J.M., Avera S.P., and Materdomini D. Marginal fidelity and microleakage of porcelain veneers made by two techniques. J Prosthet Dent 67 (1992) 16-22
140. Dhawan P., Prakash H., and Shah N. Clinical and scanning microscopic assessments of porcelain and ceromer resin veneers. Indian J Dent Res 14 (2003) 264-278
141. Meijering A.C., Creugers N.H., Roeters F.J., and Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent 26 (1998) 563-568
142. Peumans M., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., Vuylsteke-Wauters M., and Vanherle G. Five year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 29 (1998) 211-221
143. Tjan A.H., Dunn J.R., and Sanderson I.R. Microleakage patterns of porcelain and castable ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 61 (1989) 276-282
144. Suh B.I., Feng L., Pashley D.H., and Tay F.R. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified step-adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part III: effect of acidic resin monomers. J Adhes Dent 5 (2003) 267-282
145. Cheong C., King N.M., Pashley D.H., Ferrari M., Toledano M., and Tay F.R. Incompatibilty of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 747-755
146. Carvalho RM, Garcia FCP, e Silva SMA, Castro FLA. Adhesive-composite incompatibility, part II. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:191-5.
147. Davis B.K., Aquilino S.A., Lund P.S., Diaz-Arnold A.M., and Denehy G.E. Subjective evaluation of porcelain opacity on the resultant color of porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont 3 (1990) 567-572
148. Chen J.H., Shi C.X., Wang M., Zhao S.J., and Wang H. Clinical evaluation of 546 tetracycline-stained teeth treated with porcelain laminate veneers. J Dent 33 (2005) 3-8
149. Spear F.M. Esthetic correction of anterior dental malalignment: conventional vs instant (restorative) orthodontics. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 149-164
150. Christensen G.J. I have had enough!. J Esthet Restor Dent 16 (2004) 83-86
151. Felton D.A. Do no harm. J Prosthodont 13 (2004) 71-72
152. Kokich V.G. The role of orthodontics as an adjunct to periodontal therapy. In: Newman M.G., Carranza F.A., Takei H., and Klokkevold P.R. (Eds). Carranza's clinical periodontology. 10th ed. (2006), W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia 856-870
153. Walton T.R. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: clinical characteristics and outcome of single unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 12 (1999) 519-526
154. Brune D. Metal release from dental biomaterials. Biomaterials 7 (1986) 163-175
155. Fradeani M., and Redemagni M. An 11-year clinical evaluation of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns: a retrospective study. Quintessence Int 33 (2002) 503-510
156. Oden A., Andersson M., Krystek-Ondracek I., and Magnusson D. Five-year clinical evaluation of Procera AllCeram crowns. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 450-456
157. Sulaiman F., Chai J., Jameson L.M., and Wozniak W.T. A comparison of marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 10 (1997) 478-484
158. Yeo I.S., Yang J.H., and Lee J.B. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems. J Prosthet Dent 90 (2003) 459-464
159. Malament K.A., and Socransky S.S. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 14 years: part I. Survival of Dicor complete coverage restorations and effect of internal surface acid etching, tooth position, gender, and age. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 23-32
160. Odman P., and Andersson B. Procera AllCeram crowns followed for 5 to 10.5 years: a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 504-509
161. De Jager N., Pallav P., and Feilzer A.J. The influence of design parameters on FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 242-251
162. Burke F.J., Fleming G.J., Nathanson D., and Marquis P.M. Are adhesive technologies needed to support ceramics? An assessment of the current evidence. J Adhes Dent 4 (2002) 7-22
163. Marquardt P., and Strub J.R. Survival rates of IPS Empress 2 all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures: results of a 5-year prospective clinical study. Quintessence Int 37 (2006) 253-259
164. Fradeani M., D'Amelio M., Redemagni M., and Corrado M. Five-year follow-up with Procera all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 36 (2005) 105-113
165. Behr M., Rosentritt M., Mangelkramer M., and Handel G. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaption of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003) 538-542
166. Attia A., Abdelaziz K.M., Freitag S., and Kern M. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 117-123
167. Seghi R.R., Rosentiel S.F., and Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 70 (1991) 221-225
168. Ekfeldt A., Fransson B., Soderlund B., and Oilo G. Wear resistance of some prosthodontic materials in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 51 (1993) 99-107
169. Esquivel-Upshaw J.F., Young H., Jones J., Yang M., and Anusavice K.J. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results. Int J Prosthodont 19 (2006) 391-396
170. Ramp M.H., Suzuki S., Cox C.F., Lacefield W.R., and Koth D.L. Evaluation of wear: enamel opposing three ceramic materials and a gold alloy. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 523-530
171. Raigrodski A.J. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review. Dent Clin North Am 48 (2004) 531-544
172. Piconi C., and Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic material. Biomaterials 20 (1999) 1-25
173. Cales B., Stefani Y., and Lilley E. Long-term in vivo and in vitro aging of a zirconia ceramic used in orthopaedy. J Biomed Mater Res 28 (1994) 619-624
174. Yanagida H., Koumoto K., and Miyayama M. The chemistry of ceramics (1996), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK p. 247-9
175. Guazzato M., Quach L., Albakry M., and Swain M.V. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of Y-TZP dental ceramic. J Dent 33 (2005) 9-18
176. Jung Y.G., Peterson I.M., Kim D.K., and Lawn B.R. Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics. J Dent Res 79 (2000) 722-731
177. Chong K.H., Chai J., Takahashi Y., and Wozniak W. Flexural strength of In-Ceram alumina and In-Ceram zirconia core materials. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 183-188
178. Kosmac T., Oblak C., Jevnikar P., Funduk N., and Marion L. Strength and reliability of surface treated Y-TZP dental ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 53 (2000) 304-313
179. Bindl A., and Mormann W.H. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 32 (2005) 441-447
180. Wassermann A., Kaiser M., and Strub J.R. Clinical long-term results of VITA In-ceram classic crowns and fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 19 (2006) 355-363
181. Heffernan M.J., Aquilino S.A., Diaz-Arnold A.M., Haselton D.R., Stanford C.M., and Vargas M.A. . Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part I: core materials. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 4-9
182. Heffernan M.J., Aquilino S.A., Diaz-Arnold A.M., Haselton D.R., Stanford C.M., and Vargas M.A. . Relative translucency of six all-ceramic systems. Part II: core and veneer materials. J Prosthet Dent 88 (2002) 10-15
183. Olsson K.G., Furst B., Andersson B., and Carlsson G. A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 16 (2003) 150-156
184. Sorensen J.A., Kang S.K., Torres T.J., and Knode H. In-Ceram fixed partial dentures: three-year clinical trial results. J Calif Dent Assoc 26 (1998) 207-214
185. Vult von Steyern P., Jonsson O., and Nilner K. Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 379-384
186. Creugers N.H., Kayser A.F., and van't Hof M.A. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 22 (1994) 448-452
187. Scurria M.S., Bader J.D., and Shugars D.A. Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments. J Prosthet Dent 79 (1998) 459-464
188. Walton T.R. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal ceramic FPDs: part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosthodont 15 (2002) 439-445
189. Suarez M.J., Lozano J.F., Paz Salido M., and Martinez F. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 17 (2004) 35-38
190. Luthy H., Filser F., Loeffel O., Schumacher M., Gaucker L.J., and Hammerle C.H.F. Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 930-937
191. Raigrodski A.J. Contemporary materials and technologies for all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of literature. J Prosthet Dent 92 (2004) 557-562
192. Scarano A., Di Carlo F., Quaranta M., and Piattelli A. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 29 (2003) 8-12
193. Raigrodski A.J., and Chiche G.J. The safety and efficacy of anterior ceramic fixed partial dentures: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 86 (2001) 520-525
194. Tinschert J., Natt G., Mautsch W., Augthun M., and Spikermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 14 (2001) 231-238
195. Kelly J.R., Tesk J.A., and Sorensen J.A. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 74 (1995) 1253-1258
196. White S.N., Miklus V.G., McLaren E.A., Lang L.A., and Caputo A.A. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 94 (2005) 125-131
197. Suttor D., Bunke K., Hoescheler S., Hauptmann H., and Hertlein G. LAVA-the system for all-ceramic Zro2 crown and bridge frameworks. Int J Comput Dent 4 (2001) 195-206
198. Persson A., Andersson M., Oden A., and Sandborgh-Englund G. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 194-200
199. Guazzato M., Proos K., Quach L., and Swain M.V. Strength reliability and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/zirconia (Y-TZP) dental ceramics. Biomaterials 25 (2004) 5045-5052
200. Reich S., Wichmann M., Nkenke E., and Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113 (2005) 174-179
201. Ernst C.P., Cohnen U., Stender E., and Willershausen B. In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 93 (2005) 551-558