Fluoride-containing restorative materials

International Dental Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 33-43

  Burke, F M ^a,b   Ray, N J ^a   McConnell, R J ^a  

^a University College ^*

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Dental restorative materials; Fluoride release

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; FLUORIDE; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; REVIEW;

CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; FLUORIDES; HUMANS;

EID: 33646205323     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1875-595X.2006.tb00072.x     Document Type: Review

References (138)

1. Downer MC, Azli NA, Bedi R et al. How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review. Br Dent J 1999 187: 432-439.
2. Elderton RJ. Treating restorative dentistry to health. Br Dent J 1996 181: 220-225.
3. Wilson NH, Burke FJ, Mjor IA. Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1997 28: 245-248.
4. Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S. Essentials of Dental Caries. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1997.
5. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990 48: 305-311.
6. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990 48: 297-303.
7. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994 19: 228-232.
8. Jokstad A, Mjor IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 52: 234-242.
9. Mjor IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997 55: 58-63.
10. Skartveit L, Tveit AB, Totdal B et al. In vivo fluoride uptake in enamel and dentin from fluoride-containing materials. J Dent Child 1990 57: 97-100.
11. Forss H, Seppä L. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990 98:173-178.
12. Griffin F, Donly K, Erickson RL. A comparison of fluoride releasing liners. Am J Dent 1992 5: 293-295.
13. Ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995 74: 1266-1271.
14. Featherstone JDB. Fluoride, remineralization and root caries. Am J Dent 1994 7: 271-274.
15. Ten Cate JM, van Lovern, C. Fluoride mechanisms. Dent Clin North America 1999 43: 713-742.
16. Dawes C. Fluorides: Mechanisms of action and recommendations for use. J Can Dent Assoc 1989 55: 721-723.
17. Van Loveren C. The antimicrobial action of fluoride and its role in caries inhibition. J Dent Res 1990 69 Spec Iss: 676-683.
18. Tseng CC, Wolff LF, Aeppli DM. Effect of gels containing stannous fluoride on oral bacteria-an in vitro study. Aust Dent J 1992 37: 368-373.
19. De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM, De Maeyer EA. Fluoride release profiles of restorative glass ionomer formulations. Dent Mater 1996 12: 88-95.
20. Wilson AD, Kent BE. A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 1972 132: 133-135.
21. Barry TI, Clinton DJ, Wilson AD. The structure of a glass-ionomer cement and its relationship to the setting process. J Dent Res 1979 58: 1072-1079.
22. Crisp S, Lewis BG, Wilson AD. Glass ionomer cements: chemistry of erosion. J Dent Res 1976 55: 1032-41
23. Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip HK et al. In vitro fluoride release from aesthetic restorative materials following recharging with APF gel. Aust Dent J 2000 45: 198-203.
24. Hattab FN, el-Mowafy OM, Salem NS et al. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1991 22: 221-224.
25. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cement in vivo and in vitro. Swed Dent J 1991 15: 253-258.
26. Horsted-Bindslev P, Larsen MJ. Release of fluoride from conventional and reinforced glass-ionomer cements. Scand J Dent Res 1990 98: 451-455.
27. el Mallakh BF, Sarkar NK. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements in de-ionized water and artificial saliva. Dent Mater 1990 6: 118-122.
28. Preston AJ, Mair LH, Agalamanyi EA et al. Fluoride release from aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1999 26: 123-129.
29. DeSchepper EJ, Berr EA, Cailleteau JG et al. A comparative study of fluoride release from glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1991 22: 215-219
30. Carvalho AS, Cury JA. Fluoride release from some dental materials in different solutions. Oper Dent 1999 24: 14-19.
31. Shaw AJ, Carrick T, McCabe JF. Fluoride release from glass-ionomer and compomer restorative materials: 6-month data. J Dent 1998 26: 355-359.
32. Seppa L, Forss H, Øgaard B. The effect of fluoride application on fluoride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1993 72: 1310-1314.
33. Hadley PC, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Effect of monovalent ions in glass ionomer on their uptake and re-release. Biomaterials 1999 20: 891-897.
34. De Witte AM, De Maeyer EA, Verbeeck RM et al. Fluoride release profiles of mature restorative glass ionomer cements after fluoride application. Biomaterials 2000 21: 475-482.
35. Donly KJ, Nelson JJ. Fluoride release of restorative materials exposed to a fluoridated dentifrice. J Dent Child 1997 64: 249-250.
36. Strother JM, Kohn DH, Dennison JB et al. Fluoride release and re-uptake in direct tooth colored restorative materials. Dent Mater 1998 14: 129-136.
37. Diaz-Arnold AM, Holmes DC, Wistrom DW et al. Short-term fluoride release/uptake of glass ionomer restoratives. Dent Mater 1995 11: 96-101.
38. Bilgin Z, Ozalp N. Fluoride release from three different types of glass ionomer cements after exposure to NaF solution and APF gel. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998 22: 237-241.
39. Yip HK, Lam WT, Smales RJ. Fluoride release, weight loss and erosive wear of modern aesthetic restoratives. Br Dent J 1999 187: 265-270.
40. el-Badrawy WA, McComb D, Wood RE. Effect of home-use fluoride gels on glass ionomer and composite restorations. Dent Mater 1993 9: 63-67.
41. Kula K, Thompson V, Kula T et al. In vitro effect of topical fluorides on sealant materials. J Esthet Dent 1992 4: 121-127.
42. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, Ekstrand J. Glass ionomer materials as a rechargeable fluoride-release system. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997 7: 65-73.
43. Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH, Newcombe RG. Prevalence and depth of artificial caries-like lesions adjacent to cavities prepared in roots and restored with a glass ionomer or a dentin-bonded composite material. J Dent Res 1997 76: 1854-1861.
44. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Suljak JP, Koch G. Remineralization of natural carious lesions with a glass ionomer cement. Swed Dent J 1997 21: 11-17.
45. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S et al. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 1991 25: 454-458.
46. Hallgren A, Oliveby A, Twetman S. Fluoride concentration in plaque adjacent to orthodontic appliances retained with glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993 27: 51-54.
47. Benelli E M, Serra M C, Rodrigues A L Jr et al. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993 27: 280-284.
48. Rezk-Lega F, Ogaard B, Rølla G. Availability of fluoride from glass-ionomer luting cements in human saliva. Scand J Dent Res 1991 99: 60-63.
49. Sëppa L, Torppa-Saarinen E, Luoma H. Effect of different glass ionomers on the acid production and electrolyte metabolism of Streptococcus mutans Ingbritt. Caries Res 1992 26: 434-438.
50. Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ömerfeldt H-O. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Caries Res 1990 24: 133-136.
51. Svanberg M, Mjor IA, Østravik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990 69: 861-864.
52. Billings RJ, Brown LR, Kaster AG. Contemporary strategies for the treatment of root surface dental caries. Gerodontics 1985 1: 20-27.
53. Randall RC, Wilson NHF. Glass-ionomer restoratives: A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999 78: 628-637.
54. Lovadino JR, Navarro NFK, Souza MHS et al. Clinical evaluation of cermet glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1990 69: 921, 14.
55. Östlund J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin and glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars - a three year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J 16: 81-86.
56. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3 year clinical study. Caries Res 1992 26: 315-318.
57. Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer. Oper Dent 1993 18: 94-102.
58. Lumley PJ, Fisher FJ. Tunnel restorations: a long-term pilot study over a minimum of five years. J Dent 23: 213-215.
59. Levy SM, Jensen ME, Doering JV et al. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries. Gen Dent 1989 37: 468-472.
60. Levy SM, Jensen ME. A clinical evaluation of the restoration of root surface caries. Spec Care Dent 1990 10: 156-160.
61. Kaurich M, Kawakami K, Perez P et al. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer cement and microfilled composite resin in restoring root caries: two-year results. Gen Dent 1991 39: 346-349.
62. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: a five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991 36: 236-239.
63. Van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of direct composite inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994 52: 368-376.
64. Gillgrass TJ, Benington PC, Millett DT et al. Modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation? A comparative clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001 120: 49-53.
65. Kaurich M, Kawakami K, Perez P et al. Clinical comparison: resin and glass ionomer restorations of root caries. J Dent Res 1989 68: 251, 561.
66. Mjor IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 171-174.
67. Khouw-Liu VH, Anstice HM, Pearson G J. An in vitro investigation of a poly(vinyl phosphonic acid) based cement with four conventional glass-ionomer cements. Part 1: Flexural strength and fluoride release. J Dent 1999 27: 351-357.
68. Rothwell M, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste. J Dent 1998 26: 591-597.
69. Jang KT, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly KJ et al. Remineralizing effects of glass ionomer restorations on adjacent interproximal caries. J Dent Child 2001 68: 125-128, 142.
70. Smales RJ, Gao W. In vitro caries inhibition at the enamel margins of glass ionomer restoratives developed for the ART approach. J Dent 2000 28: 249-256.
71. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998 26: 372-381.
72. Marks LA, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ et al. Ketac Molar Versus Dyract Class II restorations in primary molars: twelve month clinical results. J Dent Child 2000 67: 37-41, 8-9.
73. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. A long term study of fluoride release from metal-containing conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Oral Rehabil 2001 28: 41-47.
74. Kramer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of a condensable metal-reinforced glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Br Dent J 2001 190: 317-321.
75. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Van Wyk Kotze TJ. A comparison of fluoride release from various dental materials. J Dent 1998 26: 259-265.
76. Aboush YE, Torabzadeh H. Fluoride release from tooth-colored restorative materials: a 12-month report. J Can Dent Assoc 1998 64: 561-568.
77. Preston AJ, Higham SM, Agalamanyi EA et al. Fluoride recharge of aesthetic dental materials. J Oral Rehabil 1999 26: 936-940.
78. Kan KC, Messer LB, Messer HH. Variability in cytotoxicity and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1997 76: 1502-1507.
79. Bertacchini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, Baglieto MF, Macchi RL. Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int 1999 30: 193-197.
80. Wright AB, Lee RT, Lynch E, Young KA. Clinical and microbiologic evaluation of a resin modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996 110: 469-475.
81. Wilson RM, Donly KJ. Demineralization around orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and fluoride-releasing resin composite. Pediatr Dent 2001 23: 255-259.
82. Chung CK, Millett DT, Creanor SL et al. Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding. J Dent 1998 26: 533-538.
83. Shinkai RS, Cury AA, Cury JA. In vitro evaluation of secondary caries development in enamel and root dentin around luted metallic restoration. Oper Dent 2001 26: 52-59.
84. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R et al. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999 81: 610-615.
85. Ikebe K, Ettinger RE, Wefel JS. In vitro evaluation of fluoride-releasing restorative materials for sealing the root canals of overdenture abutments. Int J Pros 14: 556-562.
86. Dietrich T, Losche AC, Losche GM et al. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999 27: 119-128, (Erratum in 463-464).
87. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M et al. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999 130: 1459-1466.
88. Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A et al. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials-3-year results. Clin Oral Investig 2001 5: 31-39.
89. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA et al. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 2001 26: 12-16.
90. Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO, Browning WD et al. Two-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Oper Dent 1999 24: 9-13.
91. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions. Am J Dent 1997 10: 18-20.
92. Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tornes KH et al. Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth. J Dent 1999 27: 437-442.
93. Folkesson UH, Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. Swed Dent J 1999 23: 1-9.
94. Keltjens HM, Creugers TJ, van't Hof MA et al. A 4-year clinical study on amalgam, resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in overdenture abutments. J Dent 1999 27: 551-555.
95. Pereira AC, Basting RT, Pinelli C, et al. Retention and caries prevention of Vitremer and Ketac-bond used as occlusal sealants. Am J Dent 1999 12: 62-64.
96. Winkler MM, Deschepper EJ, Dean JA et al. Using a resin-modified glass ionomer as an occlusal sealant: a one-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996 127: 1508-1514.
97. Smales RJ, Lee YK, Lo FW et al. Handling and clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent 1996 9: 203-205.
98. Smales RJ, Wong KC. 2-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer sealant. Am J Dent 1999 12: 59-61.
99. van Dijken JW. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 1999 107: 215-219.
100. Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Weerheijm KL et al. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine. Caries Res 1997 31: 384-389.
101. Weerheijm KL, Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ et al. Bacterial counts in carious dentine under restorations: 2-year in vivo effects. Caries Res 1999 33: 130-134.
102. van Dijken JW. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite in Class III restorations. Am J Dent 1996 9: 195-198.
103. Attin T, Buchalla W, Siewert C et al. Fluoride release/uptake of polyacid-modified resin composites (compomers) in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. J Oral Rehabil 1999 26: 388-393.
104. Oberlander H, Friedl KH, Schmalz G et al. Clinical performance of polyacid-modified resin restorations using "softstart-polymerization". Clin Oral Investig 1999 3: 55-61.
105. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer). Oper Dent 1998 23:77-80.
106. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F et al. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent 1999 21: 231-234.
107. Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT et al. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results. Quintessence Int 2000 31: 630-636.
108. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars. A multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1997 55: 255-260.
109. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C et al. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Oper Dent 2000 25: 259-264.
110. Attin T, Keilbassa AM, Plogmann S et al. Fluoride release from compromers in the acidic and neutral environment. Deutsche Zahnärtzliche Zeitschrift 1996 51: 675-678.
111. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA et al. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci 105: 81-85.
112. Attin T, Buchalla W, Ameling K et al. Effect of toothbrushing on fluoride release of polyacid-modified composite resins. Clin Oral Investig 1999 3: 150-154.
113. Tyas MJ. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract). Oper Dent 2000 25: 152-154.
114. Erickson RL. Root surface treatment with glass ionomers and resin composites. Am J Dent 1994 7: 279-85.
115. Erickson RL. Surface interactions of dentin adhesive materials. Oper Dent 1992 5 (Supplement): 81-94.
116. Davidson CL, Abdalla AI. Effects of thermal and mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of Class II resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1993 6: 39-42.
117. Seichter U. Root surface caries: a critical literature review. J Am Dent Assoc 1987 115: 305-310.
118. Kawai K, Tantbirojn D, Kamalawat A S et al. In vitro enamel and cementum fluoride uptake from three fluoride-containing composites. Caries Res 1998 32: 463-469.
119. Yap AU, Khor E, Foo SH. Fluoride release and antibacterial properties of new-generation tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1999 24: 297-305.
120. Evrenol BI, Kucukkeles N, Arun T et al. Fluoride release capacities of four different orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999 23: 315-319.
121. Young A, von der Fehr FR, Sonju T et al. Fluoride release and uptake in vitro from a composite resin and two orthodontic adhesives. Acta Odontol Scand 1996 54: 223-228.
122. Erickson RL, Jensen ME, Chan DCN et al. Evaluation of experimental fluoride containing restorative materials. J Dent Res 1987 66: 246, 1114.
123. Erickson RL, Jensen ME. In vitro investigation of secondary caries inhibition by restorative materials. J Dent Res 1989 68: 1014, 1177.
124. Glasspoole EA, Erickson RL. In vitro investigation of the caries inhibition effects of fluoride releasing materials. J Dent Res 1993 72: 284, 1448.
125. Skartveit L, Tveit AB, Mjor IA et al. Clinical assessment of a fluoride-containing amalgam. Scand J Dent Res 1986 94: 72-76.
126. Hsu CY, Donly KJ, Drake DR et al. Effect of an antimicrobial-containing varnish on root demineralisation in situ. Caries Res 1990 24: 130-132.
127. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia et al. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Oper Dent 1994 19: 183-188.
128. Skartveit L, Wefel JS, Ekstrand J. Effect of fluoride amalgams on artificial recurrent enamel and root caries. Scand J Dent Res 1991 99: 287-294.
129. Valenzuela VS, Abarca AM, Silva ND et al. In vitro inhibition of marginal caries-like lesions with fluoride-containing amalgam. Oper Dent 1994 19: 91-96.
130. Mueller HJ, Bapna MS. Copper-, indium-, tin-, and calcium-fluoride admixed amalgams: release rates and selected properties. Dent Mater 1990 6: 256-265.
131. Valenzuela V, Abarca AM, Silva N, Garesin compositeia C, Huerta J. Analysis of the in vitro antibacterial action of a fluoridated amalgam. Rev Dent Chile 1990 81: 60-64.
132. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1995 74: 1206-1211.
133. Garcia-Godoy F, Abarzua I, De Goes MF et al. Fluoride release from fissure sealants. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997 22: 45-49.
134. Rock WP, Foulkes EE, Perry H et al. A comparative study of fluoride-releasing composite resin and glass ionomer materials used as fissure sealants. J Dent 1996 24: 275-280.
135. Johnson ND, Osborne DS, Aguievtseva S et al. Six month fluoride release from seven new restorative materials. J Dent Res 1996 75: 179, 1291.
136. Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981 6: 49-54.
137. Letzel H, van't Hof MA, Vrijhoef MMA et al. Failure, survival, and reasons for replacement of amalgam restorations. In Anusavice K J (ed) Quality evaluation of dental restorations. pp 83-92. Chicago Quintessence, 1989.
138. Mjör IA. The basis for everyday, real-life operative dentistry. Oper Dent 2001 26: 521-524.