Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 32-36

  Lopes, Guilherme C ^a,b   Franke, Margarete ^a   Maia, Hamilton P ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADHESIVE AGENT; ALUMINUM OXIDE; METHYLENE BLUE; WATER; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; COLORING AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DIAMOND; FILTEK Z250; RESIN; SILUX PLUS; SINGLE BOND;

ARTICLE; BIOFINISHING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DENTIN; ENAMEL; GINGIVA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYBRID; IMMERSION; INSTRUMENTATION; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MOLAR TOOTH; RECORDING; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STORAGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE; TIME; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH DISEASE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLORING AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; DIAMOND; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHYLENE BLUE; MOLAR; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 0036632572     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(02)00045-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34:849-53.
2. Gwinnett AJ. Dental bonding. In: Baratieri LN, Monteiro S Jr, de Andrada MAC, Vieira LCC, Cardoso AC, Ritter AV. Esthetics: direct adhesive restoration on fractured anterior teeth. São Paulo: Quintessence Books; 1995. p. 397.
3. Hoelscher DC, Neme AM, Pink FE, Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 1998;23:36-42.
4. Waerhaug J. Presence or absence of plaque on subgingival restorations. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83:193-201.
5. Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque accumulation on composite surfaces after various finishing procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975;91:101-6.
6. Lui JL, Low T. The surface finish of the new microfill restorative materials. A scanning electron microscope study. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:67-82.
7. Herrgott AM, Ziemiecki TL, Dennison JB. An evaluation of different composite resin systems finished with various abrasives. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;119:729-32.
8. Yap AU, Sau CW, Lye KW. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:456-61.
9. Yap AU, Ang HQ, Chong KC. Influence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:871-6.
10. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:613-27.
11. Brackett WW, Cilpatrick RO, Gunnin TD. Effect of finishing method on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 1997;10:189-91.
12. Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer. J Oral Rehabil 1982;9:169-82.
13. Hansen EK. Visible light-cured composite resins: polymerization contraction, contraction pattern and hygroscopic expansion. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:329-35.
14. Segura A, Donly KJ. In vitro posterior composite polymerization recovery following hygroscopic expansion. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:495-9.
15. Suliman AA, Boyer DB, Lakes RS. Cusp movement in premolars resulting from composite polymerization shrinkage. Dent Mater 1993;9:6-10.
16. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 1996;75:871-8.
17. Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:610-5.
18. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction shear stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-9.
19. Hirasawa T, Hirano S, Hirabayashi S, Harashima I, Aizawa M. Initial dimensional change of composites in dry and wet conditions. J Dent Res 1983;62:28-31.
20. Owens BM, Halter TK, Brown DM. Microleakage of tooth-colored restorations with a beveled gingival margin. Quintessence Int 1998;29:356-61.
21. Yu XY, Wieczkowski G, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Influence of finishing technique on microleakage. J Esthet Dent 1990;2:142-4.
22. de Wet FA. Polishing methods for posterior resin restorations. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC, editors. Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials. St. Paul: 3M Co; 1985. p. 487.
23. Asmussen E. Clinical relevance of physical, chemical, and bonding properties of composite resins. Oper Dent 1985;10:61-73.
24. Davidson CL, Duysters PP, De Lange C, Bausch JR. Structural changes in composite surface material after dry polishing. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8: 431-9.
25. Craig RG, Power C. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2001. p. 670.
26. Mandras RS, Retief DH, Russell CM. The effect of thermal and occlusal stresses on the microleakage of the Scotchbond 2 dentinal bonding system. Dent Mater 1991;7:63-7.
27. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998;26:555-62.
28. Dodge WW, Dale RA, Cooley RL, Duke ES. Comparison of wet and dry finishing of resin composites with aluminum oxide discs. Dent Mater 1991;7:18-20.
29. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 1999;15:128-37.
30. Price RB, Hall GC. In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30: 122-34.