In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 77-83

  Lindberg, Anders ^a,b   van Dijken, J W V ^b   Horstedt P ^c  

^a Public Dental Health Clinic   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Clinical study; Light curing; Sandwich; Scanning; Soft start

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTURE; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; PREMOLAR TOOTH; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH PULP;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; HUMANS; LIGHTING; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CERVIX; VISCOSITY;

EID: 21344462850     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-005-0311-x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ (1997) Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 25:435-440
2. Venhoven BAM, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1993) Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing BisGMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials 14:871-875
3. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL (1995) Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 103:322-326
4. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P (2000) Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 58:77-84
5. Brännström M (1984) Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 9:57-68
6. Knibbs P (1992) The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 172:102-107
7. Davidson CL (1994) Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent 6:223-224
8. van Dijken JWV (1994) A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 52:368-376
9. Welbury RR, Murray JJ (1990) A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement-composite resin "sandwich" technique in class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 21:507-512
10. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke K-D, Roulet J-F (2000) Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent 25:401-410
11. Uno S, Asmussen E (1991) Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 99:440-444
12. Goracci G, Mori G, Casa de Matinis L (1996) Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 27:355-362
13. Kanca J, Suh BI (1999) Pulse activation: Reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 12:107-112
14. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2002) Composite restorations: Influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite linings on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent 27:569-575
15. Asmussen E (1982) Restorative resins: Hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 90:484-489
16. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Shiflett RA, Rueggeberg F, Schuster GS (1991) Correlation of cytotoxicity, filler loading and curing time of dental composites. Biomaterials 12:737-740
17. Prati C (1989) Early marginal microleakage in Class II resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 5:392-398
18. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JWV, Kieri C (2004) Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent 17:43-50
19. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL (1990) Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69:1240-1243 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXlvFOru7o%3D
20. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ Jr, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M (1998) A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567-577 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mtlClsA%3D%3D
21. Labella R, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G (1999) Polymerization shrinkage and elasticity of flowable composites and filled adhesives. Dent Mater 15:128-137 10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00022-6
22. Estafan D, Estafan A, Leinfelder KF (2000) Cavity wall adaptation of resin-based composite lined with flowable composites. Am J Dent 13:192-194
23. Belli S, Inokoshi S, Özer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J (2001) The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations. Oper Dent 26:70-75
24. Jain P, Belcher M (2000) Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 13:235-238
25. Chuang SF, Lie JK, Jin YT (2001) Microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations with flowable composite linings. Oper Dent 26:193-200
26. Beznos C (2001) Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26:60-69
27. Poonam J, Belcher M (2000) Microleakage of Class II resin-based composite restorations with flowable composite in the proximal box. Am J Dent 13:235-238
28. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P, Waern R (1998) Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique. Interfacial adaptation in vivo in class II cavities. Am J Dent 11:165-172
29. Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack M (1989) Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Microsc 3:147-158
30. Sjödin L, Uusitalo M, van Dijken JWV (1996) Resin modified glass ionomer cements. In vitro microleakage in class II sandwich- and direct class V fillings. Swed Dent J 20:77-86
31. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lopes ALB (1995) Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 29:1111-1120
32. Grundy JR (1971) An intra-oral replica technique for use with the scanning electron microscope. Br Dent J 130:113-117
33. van Dijken JWV (1999) Multiple versus one-bottle bonding systems. Réal Clin 10:199-222
34. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P (1987) Effect of the use of rubberdam on marginal adaptation of composite fillings placed with the acid etch technique. Acta Odontol Scand 45:303-308
35. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Deneby GE (1997) Interfacial micromorphology and shear bond strength of single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 13:316-324
36. Manhart J, Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations. J Dent 29:123-130
37. Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg A, Horstedt P (2004) Interfacial adaptation of a calcium aluminate cement used in class II cavities, in vivo. Clin Oral Invest 8:75-80
38. Ernst CP, Cortain G, Spohn M, Rippin G, Willershausen B (2002) Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: An in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/ adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites. Dent Mater 18:351-358
39. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH (2001) Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:177-183
40. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB (2004) Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29:301-308
41. Jackson RD, Morgan M (2000) The new posterior resins and a simplified placement technique. J Am Dent Assoc 131:375-383
42. Ernst CP, Canbek K, Aksogan K, Willershausen B 2003 Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner. Clin Oral Investig 7:129-134
43. Sahafi A, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E (2001) Soft-start polymerization and marginal gap formation in vitro. Am J Dent 14:145-147
44. Amaral CM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Pimenta LA (2004) Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. Am J Dent 17:156-160