An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system

European Journal of Oral Sciences

Volumn 108, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 239-246

  Pallesen, Ulla ^a   Van Dijken, Jan W V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Ceramic; Clinic; Inlays; Operative dentistry

Indexed keywords

CEREC; DICOR CERAMIC; GLASS CERAMICS; RESIN CEMENT; VITA MARK II;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEAT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEAT; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034200313     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: 16000722     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2000.108003239.x     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. DIJKEN VAN JWV, KREULEN CM, VAN PELT AWJ. Composiet inlays. Ned Tijds Tandh 1996; 103: 468-471.
2. DIJKEN VAN JWV, HÖGBERG-ÅGREN C, OLOFSSON AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow-up. J Dent 1998; 26: 219-225.
3. KUNZELMAN KH, HICKEL R. Zur präzision des Cerecsystems: Die Schleifeinheit. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990; 45: 277-280.
4. VAN MEERBEEK B, INKOSHI S, WILLEMS G, NOACK MJ, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, ROULET JF, VANHERLE G. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-coloured inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992; 20: 18-26.
5. SHEARER AC, HEYMANN HO, WILSON NHF. Two ceramic materials compared for the production of Cerec inlays. J Dent 1993; 21: 302-304.
6. HICKEL R, DASCH A, MEHL A, KREMERS L. CAD/CAM-Fillings of the future? Int Dent J 1997; 47: 247-258.
7. MÖRMANN WH, BRANDESTINI M. Die Cerec computer reconstruction. Inlays, onlays und veneers. Berlin: Quint-essence Verlags-GmbH, 1989.
8. QVIST V. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res 1985; 93: 68-75.
9. QVIST V, QVIST J. Replica patterns on composite restorations performed in vivo with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Scand J Dent Res 1995; 93: 360-370.
10. VAN DIJKEN JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six-year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44: 357-367.
11. SILLNESS J, LÖE H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121-135.
12. MÜHLEMAN HR, SON S. Gingival sulcus bleeding - a leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta 1971; 15: 107-113.
13. SIEGEL S. Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1956.
14. SJÖGREN G, BERGMAN M, MOLIN M, BESSING C. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992; 50: 171-178.
15. ISENBERG BP, ESSIG ME, LEINFELDER KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992; 4: 173-176.
16. GLADYS S, VAN MEERBEEK B, INOKOSHI S, WILLEMS G, BRAEM M, LAMBRECHTS P, VANHERLE G. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured-inlay systems. J Dent 1995; 23: 329-338.
17. HOFMANN N, POPP M, KLAIBER B. Klinische und raster-elektronenmikroskopische nachuntersuchung von Cerec-inlays nach fünf jahren liegedauer. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z 1995; 50: 835-839.
18. SJÖGREN G, MOLIN M, VAN DIJKEN JWV, BERGMAN M. Ceramic inlays (CEREC) cemented with either a dual cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A two-year clinical study. Acta Odont Scand 1995; 53: 325-330.
19. HEYMANN HO, BAYNE SC, STURDEVANT JR, WILDER AD, ROBERSON TM. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated ceramic inlays. J Am Dent Ass 1996; 127: 1171-1181.
20. BERG NG, DÉRAND T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997; 21: 121-127.
21. SJÖGREN G, MOLIN M, VAN DIJKEN JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56: 263-267.
22. ZUELLIG-SINGER R, BRYANT RW. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays. Influence of luting agent. Quintessence Int 1998; 29: 573-582.
23. FELDEN A, SCHMALZ G, FEDERLIN M, HILLER K-A. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: result up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 1998; 2: 161-167.
24. ROSENBLUM MA, SCHULMAN A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Ass 1997; 128: 297-307.
25. SCURRIA MS, POWERS JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 174-177.
26. MÖRMANN WH, KREJCI I. Computer-designed Cerec inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 109-115.
27. VAN DIJKEN JWV, HÖRSTEDT P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994; 22: 265-272.
28. BAYNE SC, TAYLOR DF, HEYMANN HO. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mat 1992; 8: 305-309.
29. HAAS M, ARNETZL G, WEGSCHNEIDER WA, KÖNIG K, BRATSCHKO RO. Klinische und werkstoffkundlige erfahrungen mit komposit-, keramik- und goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992; 47: 18-22.
30. WALTHER W, REISS B. Six year survival analysis of Cerec restorations in a private practice. In: MÖRMANN WH, ed. CAD/CAM in Aesthetic Dentistry, Cerec 10 Year Anniversary Symposium. Proceedings. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996; 199-204.
31. O'ROURKE B, WALLS AWG, WASSELL RW. Radiographic detection of overhangs formed by resin composite luting agents. J Dent 1995; 23: 353-357.
32. MARTIN N, JEDYNAKIENWICZ NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 54-61.