Influence of cavity configuration on microleakage around class V restorations bonded with seven self-etching adhesives

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 128-135

  Santini, Ario ^a   Ivanovic, Vladimir ^b   Ibbetson, Richard ^a   Milia, Egle ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH DISEASE;

EID: 4143099317     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00020.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Wieczkowski G, Yu XY, Davis EL, Joynt RB. Microleakage in various dentin bonding agent/composite resin systems. Oper Dent 1992; 17(Suppl 5):62-67.
2. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relationship to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636-1639.
3. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH, et al. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent 1995; 20:230-235.
4. Fortin D, Perdigão J, Swift EJ. Microleakage of three new dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1994; 7:315-318.
5. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L. New trends in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 2000;13:25D-30D.
6. Cardoso PEC, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1999; 12:291-294.
7. Ferrari M, Garcia-Godoy F. Sealing ability of a new generation adhesive-restorative materials placed on vital teeth. Am J Dent 2002; 15:117-128.
8. Hobson RS, McCabe JF. Relationship between enamel etch characteristics and resin-based bond strength. Br Dent J 2002; 192:463-468.
9. Miyazaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems. Am J Dent 2001; 14:361-366.
10. Miyazaki M, Platt JA, Onose H, et al. Influence of dentine primer application method on dentine strength. Oper Dent 1996; 21:167-172.
11. Miyazaki M, Hirohata N, Takagaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of self-etching drying time on enamel bond strength of resin composites. J Dent 1999; 27:203-207.
12. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerisation contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396-1399.
13. Price RB, Derand T, Andreou P, Murphy D. The effect of two configuration factors, time, and thermal cycling on resin to dentin bond strengths. Biomaterials 2003; 14:1013-1021.
14. Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. The effects of bonding system and light curing method on reducing stress of different C-factor cavities. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3:177-183.
15. Nikaido T, Kunnzelmann KH, Chen H, et al. Evaluation of thermal cycling and mechanical loading on bond strength of a self-etching primer system to dentin. Dent Mater 2002; 18:269-275.
16. American Dental Association Council on Dental Materials. ADA clinical protocol guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. Chicago: ADA, 1993.
17. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion tesing of dentin bonding agents. A review. Dent Mater 1995; 11:117-125.
18. Unterbrink GE, Liebenberg WH. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 1990; 30:249-257.
19. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor and laser polymerization on contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10:88-96.
20. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling material to enamel surface. J Dent Res 1955; 34:849-853.
21. Santini A, Ivanovic V, Milia E. Effect of cavity margin design on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with three self-etching agents. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 410. (Abstr)
22. Ikeda T, Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawakami S, Komatsu H, Sano H. Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 2002; 15:109-113.
23. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1079-1082.
24. Fernandes CP, Chevitarese O. The orientation and direction of rods in dental enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:793-800.
25. Da Cunha Mello FS, Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Sealing ability of eight resin bonding systems in a Class 2 restoration after mechanical fatiguing. Dent Mater 1997; 13:372-376.
26. Santini A, Mitchell S. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 1998; 11:219-224.
27. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10:296-304.
28. Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of resin-based composite restorations using different solvent-based bonding agents and methods of drying acid-etched dentin. Am J Dent 1999; 12:194-200.
29. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in Class V and Class 2 preparations. J Dent 1997; 25:375-389.
30. Marshall GW. Dentin: microstructure and characterization. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:606-617.
31. Marshall GW, Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentine substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. J Dent 1997; 25:441-458.
32. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH, eds. Acid conditioning and hybridization of substrates. In: Hybridization of dental hard tissue. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd., 1998:85-93.
33. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995; 74:1168-1172.
34. Bradford EW. Microanatomy and histochemistry of dentine. In: Miles AEW, ed. Structural and chemical organisation of teeth. Vol 11. New York: Academic Press, 1967:3-34.
35. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Vichi A, Davidson CL. Role of hybridization on marginal leakage and bond strength. Am J Dent 2000; 13:329-336.
36. Pradelle-Plasse N, Nechad S, Tavernier B, Colon B. Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interface microleakage. Am J Dent 2001; 14:344-348.
37. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27:89-99.
38. Goland PP, Grand NG. Chloro-S-triazines as markers and fixatives for the study of growth in teeth and bones. Am J Phys Anthropol 1968; 29:201-208.
39. Gage JP, Clarke DF. Comparison between two Procion dyes and Alizarin Red to assess marginal leakage in resin restorations. A laboratory study. Aust J Dent 1991; 36:87-93.
40. Trowbridge HO. Model systems for determining biological effects of microleakage. Oper Dent 1987; 12:164-172.
41. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K, Vichi A, Finger WL. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of adhesive restoration systems. Am J Dent 1994; 7:217-219.
42. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, et al. Microleakage of Class V composite resin restorations: a comparison between in-vivo and in-vitro. Oper Dent 1993; 18:237-245.
43. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal and axial wall integrity of in-vivo and in-vitro made adhesive Class V restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 6:295-298.
44. Pashley DH. Clinical considerations of microleakage. J Endod 1990; 16:70-77.