Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 45-64

  Hickel, Reinhard ^a   Manhart, Juergen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; TIME;

BICUSPID; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CASTING INVESTMENT; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035291831     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Allan DN. The durability of conservative restorations. Br Dent J 1969;126:172-177.
2. Allan DN. A longitudinal study of dental restorations. Br Dent J 1977;143:87-89.
3. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
4. Bentley C, Drake CW. Longevity of restorations in a dental school clinic. J Dent Educ 1986;50:594-600.
5. Berg NG, Derand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121-127.
6. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: a preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991;22:153-157.
7. Burke EJ, Qualtrough AJ. Aesthetic inlays: composite or ceramic? Br Dent J 1994;176:53-60.
8. Burke FJT, Cheung SW, Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 1999;30:234-242.
9. Chen HY, Nickel R, Setcos JC, Kunzelmann KH. Effects of surface finish and fatigue testing on the fracture strength of CAD/CAM and pressed ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:468-475.
10. Cichon P, Kerschbaum T. Verweildauer zahnärztlicher Restaurationen bei Behinderten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999;54:96-102.
11. Crabb HSM. The survival of dental restorations in a teaching hospital. Br Dent J 1981;150:315-318.
12. Dahl JE, Eriksen HM. Reasons for replacement of amalgam dental restorations. Scand J Dent Res 1978;86:404-407.
13. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P, Chan D. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 1999;30:163-168.
14. el Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Metaanalysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.
15. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Invest 1998;2:161-167.
16. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:346-353.
17. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, Simonsen RJ. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992;8:60-64.
18. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res 1996;30:428-433.
19. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Comm Dent Oral Epidem 1998;26:372-381.
20. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Saller A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996;24:25-31.
21. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B. Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:163-168.
22. Fritz U, Fischbach H, Harke I. Langzeitverweildauer von Goldgußfüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992;47:714-716.
23. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1998;26:623-626.
24. Füllemann J, Krejci l, Lutz F. Kompositinlays: Klinische und rasterelektronenmikroskopische Untersuchung nach einjähriger Funktionszeit. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1992;102:292-298.
25. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
26. Haas M, Arnetzl G, Wegscheider WA, Konig K, Bratschko RO. Klinische und werkstoffkundliche Erfahrungen mit Komposit-, Keramik- und Goldinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1992;47:18-22.
27. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations. A 3 1/2-year follow up study of Class I and II tunnel restorations in permanent and primary teeth. Swed Dent J 1993;17:173-182.
28. Hasselrot L. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study. Swed Dent J 1998;22:1-7.
29. Hawthorne WS, Smales RJ. Factors influencing long-term restoration survival in three private dental practices in Adelaide. Aust Dent J 1997;42:59-63.
30. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1998;23:318-326.
31. Helbig EB, Klimm W, Haufe E, Richter G. Klinische Fünfjahresstudie zum Feinpartikelhybrid P-50 in Kombination mit Scotchbond 2. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998;3:171-177.
32. Heymann HO, Bayne SC, Sturdevant JR, Wilder-AD J, Roberson TM. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays: a four-year study. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:1171-1181.
33. Hickel R, Petschelt A, Maier J, Voß A, Sauter M. Nachuntersuchung von Füllungen mit Cermet-Zement (Ketac-Silver). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1988;43:851-853.
34. Hickel R. Zur Problematik hypersensibler Zähne nach Eingliederung von Adhäsivinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1990;45:740-742.
35. Hickel R. Glass ionomers, cermets, hybrid ionomers and compomers - (long-term) clinical evaluation. Trans Acad Dent Mater 1996;9:105-129.
36. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Keramikinlays und Veneers. Hanser Verlag, München, 1997.
37. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, Tyas M, Anusavice K. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998;48:3-16.
38. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations. In: Wilson NHF, Roulet J-F, Fuzzi M (eds). Advances in Operative Dentistry - Challenges of the Future. Chicago: Quintessence 2001.
39. Ho TFT, Smales RJ, Fang DTS. A 2-year clinical study of two glass-ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Comm Dent Oral Epidem 1999;27:195-201.
40. Höglund CH, van Dijken JW, Olofsson AL. A clinical evaluation of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. A two year follow-up study. Swed Dent J 1992;16:169-171.
41. Höglund CH, van Dijken JW, Olofsson AL. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass-ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:140-149.
42. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
43. Jensen ME. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent 1988;1:27-33.
44. Jokstad A, Mjör IA. Analyses of long-term clinical behavior of class-II amalgam restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:47-63.
45. Jokstad A, Mjör IA, Qvist V. The age of restorations in situ. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:234-248.
46. Kamann WK, Gängler P. Zur Funktionszeit von Amalgam-, Komposite- und Goldhämmerfüllungen. Zahnärztl Welt 1999;108:270-273.
47. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Pollety T, Pelka M, Hickel R. Langzeiterfahrungen mit Cermet-Zementfüllungen in Klasse-I/II-Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:905-909.
48. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Mumesohn M, Pelka M, Hickel R. Langzeiterfahrungen mit einem mikrogefüllten Komposit als Inlaysystem. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:342-344.
49. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-331.
50. Krejci I, Lutz F. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques. J Dent 1991;19:24-32.
51. Krejci I, Krejci D, Lutz F. Clinical evaluation of a new pressed glass ceramic inlay material over 1.5 years. Quintessence Int 1992;23:181-186.
52. Krejci I, Guntert A, Lutz F. Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ. Quintessence Int 1994;25:403-409.
53. Kreulen CM, Tobi H, Gruythuysen RJM, van Amerongen WE, Borgmeijer PJ. Replacement risk of amalgam treatment modalities: 15-year results. J Dent 1998;26:627-632.
54. Lavelle CLB. A cross-sectional survey into the durability of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1976;4:139-143.
55. Leempoel PJB, Eschen S, De Haan AF, van't Hof MA. An evaluation of crowns and bridges in general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:515-528.
56. Lehner C, Studer S, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Six-year clinical results of leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays. Acta Med Dent Helv 1998;3:137-146.
57. Leinfelder KF, Sluder TB, Santos JFF, Wall JT. Five-year clinical evaluation of anterior and posterior restorations of composite resins. Oper Dent 1980;5:57-65.
58. Letzel H, van't Hof MA, Vrijhoef MM, Marshall-GW J, Marshall SJ. A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure. Dent Mater 1989;5:115-121.
59. Letzel H. Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 1989;17:10-17.
60. Letzel H, van't Hof MA, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. The influence of the amalgam alloy on the survival of amalgam restorations: a secondary analysis of multiple controlled clinical trials. J Dent Res 1997;76:1787-1798.
61. Lundin SA, Koch G. Class I and II composite restorations: a 4-year clinical follow up. Swed Dent J 1989;13:217-227.
62. Mahmood S, Smales RJ. Longevity of dental restorations in selected patients from different practice environments. Aust Dent J 1994;39:15-17.
63. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int 1998;29:483-490.
64. Mallow PK, Durward CS, Klaipo M. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass-ionomer cement. Int J Paediatr Dent 1998;8:35-40.
65. Manhart J, Hickel R. Klinische Studie zum Einsatz eines All-in-one-Adhäsivs. Erste Ergebnisse nach 6 Monaten. Quintessenz 1999;50:1277-1288.
66. Manhart J, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:289-296.
67. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Composite and ceramic inlays after 3 years of clinical service. Am J Dent (in press).
68. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of Cerec ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
69. Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:39-45.
70. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis-JW J, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:55-66.
71. Mjör IA. Amalgam and composite resin resin restorations: longevity and reasons for replacement. In: Anusavice K (ed). Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence,1989:61-80.
72. Mjör IA, Jokstad A, Qvist V. Longevity of posterior restorations. Int Dent J 1990;40:11-17.
73. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:70-73.
74. Mjör IA. Long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:60-65.
75. Mjör IA. Problems and benefits associated with restorative materials: side-effects and long-term cost. Adv Dent Res 1992;6:7-16.
76. Mjör IA, Jokstad A. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials. J Dent 1993;21:338-343.
77. Mjör IA, Medina JE. Reasons for placement, replacement, and age of gold restorations in selected practices. Oper Dent 1993;18:82-87.
78. Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:58-63.
79. Moffa JP. Comparative performance of amalgam and composite resin restorations and criteria for their use. In: Anusavice K (ed). Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence,1989:125-133.
80. Mount GJ. Longevity in glass-ionomer restorations: review of a successful technique. Quintessence Int 1997;28:643-650.
81. Mörmann W, Brandestini M. Die Cerec Computer Rekonstruktion. Inlays, Onlays und Veneers. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlag, 1989.
82. Mörmann W, Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int 1992;23:109-115.
83. Osborne JW, Normann RD, Gale EN. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Quintessence Int 1991;22:857-864.
84. Otto T. Cerec-Restaurationen. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:1039-1044.
85. Paterson N. The longevity of restorations. Br Dent J 1984;157:23-25.
86. Pelka M, Schmidt G, Petscheit A. Klinische Qualitätsbeurteilung von gegossenen Metallinlays und -onlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996;51:268-272.
87. Peters MCRB, Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen FWA. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results. Am J Dent 1996;9:83-87.
88. Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T, Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): a three-year community field trial in Thailand - survival of one-surface restorations in the permanent dentition. J Public Health Dent 1996;56:141-145.
89. Pieper K, Meyer G, Marienhagen B, Motsch A. Eine Langzeitstudie an Amalgam- und Kunststoff-Füllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1991;46:222-225.
90. Plasmans PJJM, Creugers NHJ, Mulder J. Long-term survival of extensive amalgam restorations. J Dent Res 1998;77:453-460.
91. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996;24:317-323.
92. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of toothcolored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-311.
93. Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NHF. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. J Dent 1999;27:13-19.
94. Reiss B, Walther W. Überlebensanalyse und klinische Nachuntersuchungen von zahnfarbenen Einlagefüllungen nach dem CEREC-Verfahren. Zahnärztl Welt 1991;100:329-332.
95. Reiss B, Walther W. Ereignisanalyse und klinische Langzeit-ergebnisse mit Cerec-Keramikinlays. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1998;53:65-68.
96. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Computer Dent 2000;3:9-23.
97. Robinson AD. The life of a filling. Br Dent J 1971;130:206-208.
98. Roulet JF, Herder S. Seitenzahnversorgung mit adhäsiv befestigten Keramikinlays. Berlin: Quintessenz Verlag, 1989.
99. Roulet JF. Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam. J Dent 1997;25:459-473.
100. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:40-46.
101. Rykke M. Dental materials for posterior restorations. Endod Dent Traumatol 1992;8:139-148.
102. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Manhart J, kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:391-397.
103. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:410-416.
104. Schlösser R, Kerschbaum T, Ahrens FJ, Cramer M. Uberlebensrate von Teil- und Vollgußkronen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1993;48:696-698.
105. Sjögren G, Bergman M, Molin M, Bessing C. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50:171-178.
106. Smales RJ, Gerke DC, White IL. Clinical evaluation of occlusal glass ionomer, resin, and amalgam restorations. J Dent 1990;18:243-249.
107. Smales RJ, Webster DA, Leppard PI. Survival predictions of four types of dental restorative materials. J Dent 1991;19:278-282.
108. Smales RJ. Longevity of cusp-covered amalgams: survivals after 15 years. Oper Dent 1991;16:17-20.
109. Smales RJ, Webster DA, Leppard PI. Survival predictions of amalgam restorations. J Dent 1991;19:272-277.
110. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996;46:126-130.
111. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival of extensive amalgams and posterior crowns. J Dent 1997;25:225-227.
112. Stenberg R, Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:91-97.
113. Stoll R, Sieweke M, Pieper K, Stacnniss V, Schulte A. Longevity of cast gold inlays and partial crowns - a retrospective study at a dental school clinic. Clin Oral Invest 1999;3:100-104.
114. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, Espelid l, Wikstrand K, Eide GE. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:384-389.
115. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Scharer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996;5:277-287.
116. Svanberg M. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Caries Res 1992;26:315-318.
117. Thonemann B, Federlin M, Schmalz G, Schams A. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Invest 1997;1:27-34.
118. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scand J Dent Res 1994;102:186-192.
119. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-460.
120. van Dijken JWV. 5-6 year evaluation of direct composite inlays [abstract 1801]. J Dent Res 1994;73:327.
121. van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
122. Walther W, Reiss B, Toutenburg H. Longitudinale Ereignisanalyse von Cerec-Einlagefüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994;49:914-917.
123. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995;179:343-349.
124. Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The management of occlusal caries in permanent molars. A 5-year clinical trial comparing a minimal composite with an amalgam restoration. Br Dent J 1990;169:361-366.
125. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heattreated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992;5:258-262.
126. Wiedmer CS, Krejci I, Lutz F. Klinische, röntgenologische und rasterelektronenoptische Untersuchung von Kompositinlays nach fünfjähriger Funktionszeit. Acta Med Dent Helv 1997;2:301-307.
127. Wilder AD, May KN, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leinfelder KF. Seventeen-year clinical study of ultraviolet-cured posterior composite class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:135-142.
128. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA, Wastell DG, Smith GA. A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material: five-year results. Quintessence Int 1988;19:675-681.
129. Wilson NHF, Wastell DG, Norman RD. Five-year performance of high-copper content amalgam restorations in a multiclinical trial of a posterior composite. J Dent 1996;24:203-210.
130. Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant RW. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: Influence of luting agent. Quintessence Int 1998;29:573-582.