Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 95-99

  Manhart, Juergen ^a   Chen, Hong Yan ^a   Neuerer, Petra ^a   Scheibenbogen Fuchsbrunner, Andrea ^a   Hickel, Reinhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BLEND A LUX; BLEND-A-LUX; GLASS IONOMER; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; PERTAC HYBRID; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SONO CEM; SONO-CEM; TETRIC; VARIOLINK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; BICUSPID; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CEMENTATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0035318293     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Keramikinlays und Veneers. Munich: Hanser, 1997.
2. Roulet JF. Esthetic posterior restorations. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Bologna, 18 November 1995; 27-47.
3. Manhart J, Hollwich B, Mehl A, et al. Randqualität von Ormocer- und Kompositfüllungen in Klasse-II-Kavitäten nach künstlicher Alterung. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1999; 54:89-95.
4. Manhart J, Mehl A, Schroeter R, et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion. Oper Dent 1999; 24:223-232.
5. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, et al. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16:33-40.
6. Hickel R, Dasch W, Janda R, et al. New direct restorative materials. Int Dent J 1998; 48:3-16.
7. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF, Smith GA. The porcelain inlay: A historical view. Oper Dent 1990; 15:61-70.
8. Kelsey WP, Cavel WT, Blankenau RJ, et al. 4-year clinical study of castable ceramic crowns. Am J Dent 1995; 8:259-262.
9. Sjögren G, Lantto R, Granberg A, et al. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: A retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:122-128.
10. McLean JW. The science and art of dental ceramics. Vol. 1. Chicago: Quintessence, 1980.
11. Messer PF, Piddock V, Lloyd CH. The strength of dental ceramic. J Dent 1991; 19:51-55.
12. Wiley MG. Effects of porcelain on occluding surfaces of restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:133-137.
13. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, et al. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5:9-16.
14. Burgoyne AR, Nicholls JI, Brudvik JS. In vitro two-body wear of inlay-onlay composite resin restoratives. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:206-214.
15. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993; 21:39-46.
16. Manhart J, Hickel R. Esthetic compomer restorations in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhesive: Case presentation. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:250-258.
17. Cunningham J. Posterior composites: Evaluations without trials? J Dent 1989; 17:18-21.
18. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson W, et al. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:143-151.
19. Bessing C, Lundqvist P. A 1-year clinical examination of indirect composite resin inlays: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:153-157.
20. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:456-460.
21. Wassell RW, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: Three-year clinical results. Br Dent J 1995; 179:343-349.
22. Wendt SL, Leinfelder KF. Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results. Am J Dent 1992; 5:258-262.
23. Davidson CL. Posterior composites: Criteria for assessment. Introduction. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:515.
24. Freilich MA, Goldberg AJ, Gilpatrick RO, et al. Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years. Dent Mater 1992; 8:60-64.
25. Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Dental Health Center, San Francisco: US Government Printing Office; Publ. No. 7902244, 1971.
26. Leinfelder KF. Evaluation of criteria used for assessing the clinical performance of composite resins in posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 1987; 18:531-536.
27. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973; 87:369-377.
28. Ryge G, Stanford JW. Recommended format for protocol of clinical research program: Clinical comparison of several anterior and posterior restorative materials. Int Dent J 1977; 27:46-57.
29. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. Int Dent J 1980; 30:347-358.
30. Feller RP, Ricks CL, Matthews TG, et al. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite formulations for posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:544-550.
31. Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Glantz PO, et al. Standardization of clinical investigators for studies of restorative materials. Swed Dent J 1981; 5:235-239.
32. Pelka M, Dettenhofer G, Reinelt C, et al. Validität und Reliabilität klinischer Kriterien für adhäsive Inlaysysteme. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49:921-925.
33. Goldberg AJ, Rydinge E, Santucci E, et al. Clinical evaluation methods for posterior composite restorations. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1387-1391.
34. Dahl BL, Oilo G. In vivo wear ranking of some restorative materials. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:561-565.
35. DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, et al. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1986; 2:214-219.
36. Manhart J, Mehl A, Obermeier T, et al. Finite element study on stress distribution in dependence on cavity width and material properties. Trans Acad Dent Mat 1996; 9:269.
37. van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998; 26:219-225.
38. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:346-353.
39. Isidor F, Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:140-144.
40. Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Randspaltverhalten von Komposit- und Keramikinlays bei ausgedehnten Kavitäten. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1996; 51:701-704.
41. Donly KJ, Jensen ME, Triolo P, et al. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years: Quintessence Int 1999; 30:163-168.
42. Anusavice K. Recent developments in restorative material dental ceramics. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:72-84.
43. Manhart J, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, et al. Bond strength of a compomer to dentin under various surface conditions. Clin Oral Invest 1999; 3:175-180.