Five-year evaluation of two resin-retained ceramic systems: A retrospective study in a general practice setting

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 302-306

  Arnelund, Carl Fredrik ^a   Johansson, Anders ^a   Ericson, Maths ^b   Häger, Per ^c   Fyrberg, Kristina Arvidson ^d  

^a POSTGRADUATE DENTAL EDUCATION CENTER   (Sweden)

^b INSTITUTE FOR POSTGRADUATE DENTAL EDUCATION   (Sweden)

^c Public Dental Health Service   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACRYLATES; ADULT; AGED; ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 2542523919     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Vult von Steyern P, Jönsson O, Nilner K. Five-year evaluation of posterior all-ceramic three-unit (In-Ceram) FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14:379-384.
2. Olsson K-G, Fürst B, Andersson B, Carlsson GE. A long-term retrospective and clinical follow-up study of In-Ceram Alumina FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:150-156.
3. Swedish Government Proposition 93/94:163. Regulations for a Continuing Recycling in the Society-Measures to Minimize the Risks with Handling of Chemical Waste [in Swedish]. Stockholm: Riksdagsbiblioteket, Swedish Government, 1994.
4. McLean JW, Hughes TH. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1965;119:251-367.
5. McLean JW. Evolution of dental ceramics in the twentieth century. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:61-66.
6. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:135-141.
7. Stanley HR. Pulpal responses to conditioning and bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1993;5:208-214.
8. Torstenson B, Nordenvall KJ, Brännström M. Pulpal reaction and microorganisms under Clearfil composite resin in deep cavities with acid etched dentin. Swed Dent J 1982;6:167-176.
9. White KC, Cox CF, Kanka J, Dixon DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs HM. Pulpal response to adhesive resin systems applied to acid-etched vital dentin: Damp versus dry primer application. Quintessence Int 1994;25:259-268.
10. Gilpatrick RO, Johnson W, Moore D, Turner J. Pulpal response to dentin etched with 10% phosphoric acid. Am J Dent 1996;9:125-129.
11. Olmez A, Oztas N, Basak F, Sabuncuoglu B. A histopathologic study of direct pulp-capping with adhesive resins. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:98-103.
12. Cox C, Hafez A, Akimoto N, Otsuki M, Suzuki S, Tarim B. Biocompatibility of primer, adhesive and resin composite systems on non-exposed and exposed pulps of non-human primate teeth. Am J Dent 1998;10:55-63.
13. Peumans M, van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers bonded to tooth structure: An ultra-morphological FESEM examination of the adhesive interface. Dent Mater 1999;15:105-119.
14. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: Clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:71-79.
15. Molin M, Karlsson S. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
16. Pallesen U, van Dijken JW. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-246.
17. Sjögren G, Lantto R, Granberg A, Sundström BO, Tillberg A. Clinical examination of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns (Empress) in general practice: A retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12: 122-128.
18. California Dental Association. Quality Evaluation for Dental Care. Guidelines for the Assessment of Clinical Quality and Professional Performance. Los Angeles: CDA, 1977.
19. Hekland H, Riise T, Berg E. Remake of Colorlogic and IPS Empress ceramic restorations in general practice. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16: 621-625.
20. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:346-353.
21. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-267.
22. Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: 1. Protocol and patient profile. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:325-331.
23. Walton TR. A 10-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthodontics: Clinical characteristics and outcome of single-unit metal-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:519-526.
24. Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 1. Outcome. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:439-445.
25. Neiva G, Yaman P, Dennison J, Razzoog M, Lang B. Resistance to fracture of three all-ceramic systems. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:60-66.
26. Felden A, Schmalz G, Federlin M, Hiller KA. Retrospective clinical investigation and survival analysis on ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: Results up to 7 years. Clin Oral Investig 1998;2:161-167.
27. Chu F, Frankel N, Smales R. Surface roughness and flexural strength of self-glazed, polished, and reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha porcelain laminates. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:66-71.