A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 241-246

  Sjögren, Göran ^a   Molin, Margareta ^a   Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; PERFORMANCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; CEMENTATION; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PHASE TRANSITION; POLYMERS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 1842841840     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Mörmann W, Brandestini M. Die Cerec Computer Reconstruction. Inlays, Onlays und Veneers. Berlin: Quintessence, 1989.
2. Leinfelder KF, Isenberg BP, Essig ME. A new method for generating ceramic restorations: A CAD/CAM system. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;118:703-707.
3. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chair-side computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20: 329-339.
4. Sjögren G, Bergman M, Molin M, Bessing C. A clinical examination of ceramic (Cerec) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand 1992;50: 171-178.
5. Berg NG, Dérand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121-127.
6. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
7. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-246.
8. Reiss B. Long-term clinical performance of Cerec restorations and the variables affecting treatment success. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:14-18.
9. Otto T, De Nisco S. Computer-aided direct ceramic restorations: A 10-year prospective clinical study of Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:122-128.
10. Brodbelt RHW, O'Brien WJ, Fan PL. Translucency of dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1980;59:70-75.
11. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cement J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:295-300.
12. Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Caughman WF. The curing potential of light-activated composite resin luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65: 512-518.
13. Hasegawa EA, Boyer DB, Chan DC. Hardening of dual-cured cements under composite resin inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66: 187-192.
14. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF. The influence of light exposure on polymerization of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent 1993;18: 48-55.
15. Peutzfeldt A. Dual-cure resin cements: In vitro wear and effect of quantity of remaining double bonds, filler volume, and light curing. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:29-34.
16. Darr AH, Jacobsen PH. Conversion of dual cure luting cements. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:43-47.
17. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 1995;53:325-330.
18. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-265.
19. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Kärkkäinen S. Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:277-281.
20. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests - A pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:8-10.
21. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Non parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457-465.
22. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991.
23. van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Åberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
24. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - Results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:40-46.
25. van Dijken JWV. A 6-year evaluation of direct composite resin inlays/onlay system and glass-ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-376.
26. Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of ceramic (Optec) system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:145-149.
27. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement and resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-272.
28. Studer S, Lehner C, Broadbeck U, Schärer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996;5:277-287.
29. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: Clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-465.
30. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:515-524.
31. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, El-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999;24: 38-44.
32. van Dijken JWV, Hasselrot L, Örmin A, Olofsson A-L. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:222-229.