Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years

Dental Materials

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 262-271

  Krämer, Norbert ^a   Frankenberger, Roland ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Dentine bonding; Glass ceramics; Resin composites

Indexed keywords

BONDING; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTISTRY; FRACTURE; RESINS; RESTORATION;

CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTINE BONDING; LUTING COMPOSITES; RESIN COMPOSITES;

GLASS CERAMICS;

ALUMINUM SILICATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; LEUCITE; RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 13444260881     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Banks R.G. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 63:1990;619-626
2. Jäger K., Wirz J., Schmidli F. Ceramic inlays as alternative to amalgam? Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 100:1990;1345-1352
3. Kelly J.R., Nishimura I., Campbell S.D. Ceramics in dentistry: Historical roots and current persepectives. J Prosthet Dent. 75:1996;18-32
4. Qualthrough A.J.E., Wilson N.H.F. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent. 24:1996;317-323
5. Thonemann B., Federlin M., Schmalz G., Schams A. Clinical evaluation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic inlays in vivo: 2-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 1:1997;27-34
6. Fradeani M., Aquilano A., Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and a half years. J Prosthet Dent. 78:1997;346-353
7. Krämer N., Frankenberger R., Pelka M., Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent. 27:1999;325-331
8. Wohlwend A., Schärer P. Die Empress-Technik. Quintessenz Zahntech. 16:1990;966-978
9. Molin M.K., Karlsson S.L. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont. 13:2000;194-200
10. Fuzzi M., Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent. 26:1998;623-626
11. Fuzzi M., Rappelli G. Ceramic inlays: clinical assessment and survival rate. J Adhes Dent. 1:1999;71-79
12. Hayashi M., Wilson N.H.F., Yeung C.A., Worthington H.V. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 7:2003;8-19
13. Reiss B., Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10 year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent. 3:2000;9-23
14. Molin K., Karlsson. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand. 54:1996;145-149
15. Höglund Ä.C., van Dijken J.W.V., Oloffson A.L. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odont Scand. 52:1994;140-147
16. Thordrup M., Isidor F., Hörstedt-Bindslev P. A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays. Scan J Dent Res. 102:1994;186-192
17. Friedl K.H., Schmalz G., Hiller K.-A., Saller A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent. 24:1996;25-31
18. Bessing C., Molin M. An in vivo study of glass ceramic (Dicor) inlays. Acta Odontol Scand. 48:1990;351-358
19. Gladys S., Van Meerbeek B., Inokoshi S., Willems G., Braem M., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-colored inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent. 23:1995;329-338
20. Hayashi M., Tsuchitani Y., Miura M., Takeshige F., Ebisu S. 6-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent. 23:1998;318-326
21. Roulet J.-F. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Investig. 1:1997;40-46
22. Stenberg R., Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand. 51:1993;91-97
23. El Mowafy O., Brochu J. Longevity and clinical performance of IPS Empress ceramic restorations - a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc. 68:2002;233-237
24. Heymann H.O., Bayne S.C., Sturdevant J.R., Wilder A.D., Roberson T.M. The clinical performance of CAD-CAM-generated ceramic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 127:1996;1171-1181
25. Isenberg B.P., Essig M.E., Leinfelder K.F. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent. 4:1992;173-176
26. Mörmann W.H., Krejci I. Computer-designed inlays after 5 years in situ: clinical performance and scanning electron microscopic evaluation. Quintessence Int. 23:1992;109-115
27. Sjögren G., Molin M., van Dijken J.W.V. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand. 56:1998;263-267
28. Krämer N., Frankenberger R. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years. Part II: wear of luting composites. Oper Dent. 25:2000;466-472
29. Noack M.J., Roulet J.-F., Bergmann P. A new method to lute tooth coloured inlays with highly filled composite resins. J Dent Res. 1991;70-457. (Abstract 1528)
30. O'Reilly M.M., Featherstone J.D. Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: an in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 92:1987;33-40
31. Cvar J.F., Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restoration materials. In: USPHS Publication No. 790, US Government Printing Office. 1971
32. Frankenberger R., Petschelt A., Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years. Part I: clinical behavior. Oper Dent. 25:2000;459-465
33. Hickel R. The problem of hypersensitivities after insertion of adhesive inlays (in German, Abstract in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 45:1990;740-742
34. Bodenheim G., Frankenberger R., Schoch M., Krämer N. Clinical evaluation of a new ceramic luting system - six months follow-up. J Dent Res. 78:1999;308. (Abstract 369)
35. Isidor F., Brondum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent. 74:1995;140-144
36. Jensen M.E. A two-year clinical study of posterior etched-porcelain resin-bonded restorations. Am J Dent. 1:1987;27-32
37. Kawai K., Isenberg B.P., Leinfelder K.F. Effect of gap dimension on composite resin cement wear. Quintessence Int. 25:1994;53-58
38. Krejci I., Lutz F., Reimer M. Wear of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: restorations, opposing cusps, and luting cements. Quintessence Int. 25:1994;199-207
39. Krämer N., Pelka M., Petschelt A. Comparison of luting composites using the high viscosity cementation technique. J Dent Res. 74:1995;537. (Abstract 1096)
40. O'Neil S.J., Miracle R.L., Leinfelder K.F. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc. 124:1993;48-54
41. Van Dijken J.W.V., Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent. 22:1994;265-272
42. Schmalz G., Federlin M., Geurtsen W. Are ceramic inlays and veneers scientifically established? (in German, Abstract in English). Dtsch Zahnärztl Z. 49:1994;197-208
43. De Munck J., Van Meerbeek B., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Suzuki K., Lambrechts P., Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 82:2003;136-140
44. Frankenberger R., Strobel W.O., Lohbauer U., Krämer N., Petschelt A. The effect of six years water storage on resin composite bonding to human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res. 69 B:2004;25-32
45. Drummond J.L., King T.J., Bapna M.S., Koperski R.D. Mechanical property evaluation of pressable restorative ceramics. Dent Mater. 16:2000;226-233
46. Ohyama T.M., Yoshinari M., Oda Y. Effects of cyclic loading on the strength of all-ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont. 12:1999;28-37
47. Hickel R., Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent. 3:2001;45-64