Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 499-507

  Spreafico, Roberto C ^a   Krejci, Ivo ^b   Dietschi, Didier ^b,c  

^a Private Office   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Class II restorations; Clinical trial; Direct semidirect techniques; Marginal adaptation; Posterior composite

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTAL CARIES; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MOUTH CAVITY; RECURRENT DISEASE; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOOTH EXTRACTION; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); POLYURETHANES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 20144386374     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. W.H. Douglas Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth G. Vanherle D.C. Smith Posterior composite resin dental restorative materials 1995 Peter Szulc Publishing Co. 433 441
2. I. Krejci Zahnfarbene Restaurationen: Qualität, Potential und Indikationen 1992 Carl Hanser Verlag Munich p. 38-56
3. D. Dietschi, and R. Spreafico Adhesive metal-free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth 1997 Quintessence Publishing Co Berlin
4. R.L. Leung, P.L. Fan, and W.M. Johnston Post-irradiation polymerization of visible light-activated composite resin Journal of Dental Research 62 1983 262 265
5. A.J. De Gee, A.J. Feilzer, and C.L. Davidson True linear polymerization shrinkage of unfilled resins and composites determinated with a linometer Dental Materials 9 1993 11 14
6. K.K. Kildal, and I.E. Ruyter How different curing methods affect the degree of conversion of resin-based inlay/onlay materials Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 52 1994 315 322
7. M. Stavridakis, A. Kakaboura, and I. Krejci Linear polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage forces of resin-based restorative materials Odontostomatologiki Proodos 54 2000 213 225
8. J.F. Roulet, M. Götz, and N.M. Lösche Inlays and onlays Current Opinion in Esthetic Dentistry 1 1993 41 54
9. D. Dietschi, U. Scampa, G. Campanile, and J. Holz Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect class II composite resin restorations: an in vitro evaluation Quintessence International 26 1995 127 138
10. D. Dietschi, and D. Herzfeld In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing European Journal of Oral Sciences 106 1998 1033 1042
11. W.H. Mörmann Composite inlays: a research model with practice potential? Quintessenz 33 1982 1891 1901
12. J. Fullemann, and F. Lutz Direct composite inlay. The new procedure and its in vitro test results Schweiz Mschr Zahnmed 98 1998 758 764
13. C.S. Wiedmer, I. Krejci, and F. Lutz Klinische, röntgenologische und rasterelektronenoptische Untersuchung von Kompositinlays nach fünfjähriger Funktionszeit Acta Medica of Dental Helvetica 106 1997 301 307
14. J.W. Van Dijken A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 52 1994 368 376
15. J.W. Van Dijken Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: an 11 year follow up Journal of Dentistry 28 2000 299 306
16. I. Krejci, and M. Stavvridakis New perspectives on dentin adhesion-the different ways of bonding Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry 12 2000 727 732
17. D. Dietschi, B. Ciucchi, and J. Holz A clinical trial of four light curing posterior composite resins: 9-month report Quintessence International 20 1989 641 652
18. I. Krejci, A. Guntert, and F. Lutz Scanning electron microscopic and clinical examination of composite resin inlays/onlays up to 12 months in situ Quintessence International 25 1994 403 409
19. B. Luescher, F. Lutz, H. Ochsenbein, and H.R. Muhlemann Microleakage and marginal adaptation in conventional and adhesive class II restoration Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 37 1977 300 309
20. J.F. Roulet A materials scientist's view: assessment of wear and marginal integrity Quintessence International 18 1987 543 552
21. D. Dietschi, and J. Holz A clinical trial of four light-curing posterior composite resins: two-year report Quintessence International 21 1990 965 975
22. L. Sachs Angewandte Statistik: Planung und Auswertung Methoden und Modelle 1974 Springer Berlin p. 420-422
23. C.L. Davidson, A.J. de Gee, and A. Feilzer The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress Journal of Dental Research 63 1984 1396 1399
24. R.L. Bowen, K. Nemoto, and J.E. Rapson Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues: forces developing in composite materials during hardening Journal of American Dental Association 106 1983 475 477
25. A. Feilzer, A.J. de Gee, and C.L. Davidson Setting stress in resin composite in relation to configuration of the restoration Journal of Dental Research 66 1987 1636 1639
26. F. Lutz, and M. Kull The development of a posterior tooth composite system, in vitro investigation Schweiz Mschr Zahnheilk 90 1980 455 483
27. F. Lutz, I. Krejci, B. Luescher, and T.R. Oldenburg Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges Quintessence International 17 1986 659 664
28. E. Lutz, I. Krejci, and T.R. Oldenburg Elimination of polymerization stresses at the margins of posterior composite resin restorations: a new restorative technique Quintessence International 17 1986 777 784
29. C.L. Davidson, and A.J. de Gee Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites Journal of Dental Research 63 1984 146 148
30. J. Fullemann, I. Krejci, and F. Lutz Composite inlays: clinical and scanning electron microscopic research after a 1-year functional period Schweiz Mschr Zahnmed 102 1992 292 298
31. G. Schmalz, M. Federlin, and E. Reich Effect of dimension of luting space and luting composite on marginal adaptation of a class II ceramic inlay Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 73 1995 392 399
32. J.A. Sorensen, and E.C. Munksgaard Relative gap formation adjacent to ceramic inlays with combinations of resin cements and dentin bonding agents Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 76 1996 472 476
33. R. Frankenberger, J. Sindel, N. Kramer, and A. Petschelt Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays Operative Dentistry 24 1999 147 155
34. L.H. Mair Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams Quintessence International 29 1998 483 490
35. I.A. Mjör, J.E. Dahl, and J.E. Moorhead Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 58 2000 97 101
36. D.F. Taylor, S.C. Bayne, J.R. Sturdevant, and A.D. Wilder Restoration width and complexity effects on posterior composite wear Journal of Dental Research 68 1989 186 (Abstract #35)
37. W.H. Liebenberg Assuring restorative integrity in extensive posterior resin composite restorations: pushing the envelope Quintessence International 31 2000 153 164
38. R. Hickel, and J. Manhart Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 3 2001 45 64
39. S.L. Wendt Jr, and K.F. Leinfelder Clinical evaluation of a heat-treated resin composite inlay: 3-year results American Journal of Dentistry 5 1992 258 262
40. M. Thordrup, F. Isidor, and P. Hörstedt-Bindslev A one-year clinical study of indirect and direct composite and ceramic inlays Scandavian Journal of Dental Research 10 1994 186 192
41. R.W. Wassel, A.W.G. Walls, and J.F. McCabe Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: three year clinical results British Dental Journal 179 1995 343 349
42. N. Krämer, K-H. Kunzelmann, and M. Mumesohn Langzeiterfahrungen mit einem mikrogefüllten Komposit als Inlay System Dtsch Zahnarztl Z51 1996 342 344
43. M. Hannig Das Randschlussverhalten von Kompositinlays aus SR-Isosit. In-vitro Resultate nach sieben Jahren Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 51 1996 595 597
44. A. Scheibenbogen, J. Manhart, K.H. Kunzelmann, and R. Hickel One-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 80 1998 410 416
45. R.W. Wassel, A.W.G. Walls, V. Vogt-Crothers, and J.F. McCabe Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: five-year follow-up Journal of Dental Research 77 1998 913 (Abstract #2254)
46. K.J. Donly, M.E. Jensen, P. Triolo, and D. Chan A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years Quintessence International 30 1999 163 168
47. J. Manhart, P. Neuerer, A. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner, and R. Hickel Three year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 84 2000 289 296
48. J. Manhart, A. Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner, H.Y. Chen, and R. Hickel A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays Clinical Oral Investigation 4 2000 192 198
49. M. Hayashi, and N.H.F. Wilson Marginal deterioration as a predictor of failure of a posterior composite European Journal of Oral Sciences 111 2003 155 162
50. I. Krejci, J. Fuellemann, and F. Lutz Klinische, rasterelektronenmikroskopische Langzeituntersuchung von Kompositinlays Schweiz Mschr Zahnmed 104 1994 1351 1356
51. R. Boretti, I. Krejci, and F. Lutz Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fine hybrid composite restorations in posterior teeth after four years of wear Journal of Dental Research 76 1997 41 (Abstract #222)
52. J.W. Van Dijken, and P. Hörstedt Marginal breakdown of 5-year old direct composite inlays Journal of Dentistry 24 1996 389 394
53. U. Pallesen, and V. Qvist Clinical evaluation of resin fillings and inlays: 8-year report Journal of Dental Research 77 1999 914 (Abstract #2257)
54. F. Lutz Composite restoration-rational handling and better margins thanks to newly developed polishing elements (II) Quintessenz 31 1980 125 129
55. J.W. Van Dijken, C. Höglund-Aberg, and A.L. Olofsson Fired ceramic inlays. A six year follow-up Journal of Dentistry 26 1998 219 225
56. U. Pallesen, and J.W. van Dijken An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system European Journal of Oral Sciences 108 2000 239 246
57. F. Lutz, and I. Krejci Resin composites in the post-amalgam age Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 20 1999 1138 1144