Ceramic inlays and onlays: Clinical procedures for predictable results

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 338-352

  Meyer Filho, Alfredo ^a,b   Cardoso Vieira, Luiz Clovis ^a   Araujo, Élito ^a   Baratieri, Luiz Narciso ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMALGAM; CEMENT; RESIN;

CASE REPORT; CEMENTATION; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; DENTISTRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LITERATURE; REVIEW; TOOTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

EID: 1542297599     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00307.x     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Jones DW. Development of dental ceramics. An historical perspective. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29:621-644.
2. Simonsen RJ, Calamia JR. Tensile bond strength of etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1983; 62:297. (Abstr)
3. Horn H. Porcelain laminate veneers bonded to etched enamel. Dent Clin North Am 1983; 27:671-684.
4. Nasedkin JN. Porcelain posterior resin-bonded restorations: current perspectives on esthetic restorative dentistry: part II. J Can Dent Assoc 1988; 54:499-506.
5. Van Dijken JWV. All-ceramic restorations: classification and clinical evaluations. Compendium 1999; 20:1115-1134.
6. Piddock V, Qualtrough AJE. Dental ceramics - an update. J Dent 1990; 18:227-235.
7. Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75:18-32.
8. Baratieri LN, Ritter AV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restoration placed using the total-etch technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:50-57.
9. Mjör IA. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55:53-57.
10. Ritter A. Posterior resin-based composite restorations: clinical recommendations for optimal success. J Esthet Restor Dent 2001; 13:88-99.
11. Lopes GC, Ferreira RS, Baratieri LN, et al. Direct posterior resin composite restorations: new techniques and clinical possibilities. Case reports. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:337-346.
12. Christensen GJ. A look at state-of-the-art tooth-colored inlays and onlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:66-70.
13. Lutz F. State of the art of tooth-colored restoratives. Oper Dent 1996; 21:237-248.
14. Roznowski M, Bremer B, Geurtsen W. Fracture resistence of human molars restored with various filling materials. In: Mormann WH, ed. International Symposium of Computer Restorations. Berlin: Quintessence, 1991:37-76.
15. Reel DC, Mitchell RJ. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:177-180.
16. Shellard E, Duke ES. Indirect composite resin materials for posterior applications. Compendium 1999; 20:1166-1171.
17. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kremers L, et al. Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 391-397.
18. Robson P, More B, Swartz M. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 1987; 12:113-116.
19. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal free restorations: current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. 1st Ed. Chicago: Quintessence Books, 1997.
20. Brunton PA, Burke FJT, Wilson NHFW. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:167-171.
21. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:199-205.
22. Lopes LMP, Leitão JGM, Douglas WH. Effect of a new inlay/onlay material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:641-645.
23. Redford DA, Jensen ME. Etched porcelain resin-bonded posterior restorations: cuspal flexure, strength, and micro-leakage. J Dent Res 1986; 65:334. (Abstr)
24. Scheibenbogen A, Manhart J, Kunzelmann K-H, et al. One year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays in posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:410-416.
25. Ritter AV, Baratieri LN. Ceramic restorations for posterior teeth: guidelines for the clinician. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:1172-1185.
26. Yatani H, Watanbe EK, Kaneshima T, et al. Etched-porcelain resin-bonded onlay technique for posterior teeth. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10:325-332.
27. Aberg CH, van Dijken JWV, Olofsson A-L. Three-year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52:140-149.
28. Wat PYP, Cheung GSP. Factors affecting the chance of post-operative sensivity in indirect porcelain onlays. J Dent Res 1997; 76:271. (Abstr)
29. Hilton TJ. Cavity sealers, liners and bases: current philosophies and indications for use. Oper Dent 1996; 21:134-146.
30. Keogh TP. Direct pulp capping with a dentinal adhesive resin system: a pilot study. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:227-228.
31. Nasedkin JN. Ceramic inlays and onlays: update 1995. J Can Dent Assoc 1995; 61:676-680.
32. Mclaren EA. All-ceramic alternatives to conventional metal-ceramic restorations. Compendium 1998; 19:307-325.
33. Tsai Y-L, Petsche PE, Anusacevice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 18:27-32.
34. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistence of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6:462-467.
35. Moscovich H, Roeters FJ, Verdons N, et al. Effect of composite basing on the resistance to bulk fracture of industrial porcelain inlays. J Dent 1998; 26:183-189.
36. Roseblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128:297-307.
37. Giordano RA, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 411-418.
38. Seghi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:239-246.
39. Gladys S, Van Meerbeeck B, Inokoshi S, et al. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-colored inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 1995; 23:329-338.
40. O'Neal SJ, Miracle RL, Leinfelder KF. Evaluating interfacial gaps for esthetic inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124:48-54.
41. Krejci I, Lutz F, Reimer M. Marginal adaptation and fit of adhesive ceramic inlays. J Dent 1993; 21:39-46.
42. Van Meerbeeck B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, et al. Marginal adaptation of four tooth-colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992; 20:18-26.
43. Molin MK, Karlsson SL, Kristiansen MS. Influence of film thickness on joint bend strength of a ceramic/resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1996; 12:245-249.
44. Audenino G, Bresciano ME, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro evaluation of fit of adhesively luted ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:342-347.
45. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10: 478-484.
46. Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Heymann HO. Margin gap size of ceramic inlays using second-generation CAD/CAM equipment. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:206-214.
47. Mörmann WH, Bindl A. The Cerec 3 - a quantum leap for computer-aided restorations: initial clinical results. Quintessence Int 2000; 31:699-712.
48. Noack MJ, Roulet JF. Survival rates and mode of failure of Dicor inlays after 4 years. J Dent Res 1994; 73:196. (Abstr)
49. Qualtrough AJE, Wilson NHF. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996; 24:317-323.
50. Fradeani M, Aquilano A, Bassein L. Longitudinal study of pressed glass-ceramic inlays for four and half years. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:346-353.
51. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemical cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998; 56:263-267.
52. Van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Aberg C, Olofsson A-L. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow-up. J Dent 1998; 26:219-225.
53. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the Cerec CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108:239-246.
54. Uctasli S, Wilson HJ, Unterbrink G, Zaimoglu A. The strength of a pressed all-ceramic restorative material. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23:257-261.
55. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:652-661.
56. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater 1995; 11:103-110.
57. Thompson JY, Anusavice KJ, Naman A, Morris HF. Fracture surface characterization of clinically failed All-Ceram crowns. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1824-1832.
58. Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int 1994; 25:773-779.
59. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5:9-16.
60. Milleding P, Ortengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22:571-580.
61. Albers HF. Ceramometal bonded inlays and onlays. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12:122-130.
62. Burke FJT. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with dentin-bonded crowns: the effect of increased tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:115-121.
63. Schaffer H, Zobler C. Complete restoration with resin-bonded porcelain inlays. Quintessence Int 1991; 22:87-93.
64. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain and composite inlays and onlays: esthetic posterior restorations. 1st Ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., 1994.
65. Banks RG. Conservative posterior ceramic restorations: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:619-626.
66. Abu-Hassan MI, Abu-Hammad AO, Harrison A. Stress distribution with loaded ceramic onlay restorations with different designs of marginal preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27:294-298.
67. Liebenberg WH. Use of resin-bonded partial coverage ceramic restorations to treat incomplete fractures in posterior teeth: a clinical report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:739-747.
68. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1460-1465.
69. Söderholm KJM, Shang SW. Molecular orientation of silane at the surface of colloidal silica. J Dent Res 1993; 72:1050-1054.
70. Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Correlation of topography to bond strength of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:59-64.
71. Jardel V, Degrange M, Picard B, Derrien G. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 19:415-418.
72. Chen JH, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Effect of etching period and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998; 23:250-257.
73. Dietschi D, Maeder M, Meyer J-M, Holtz J. In vitro resistance to fracture of porcelain inlays bonded to tooth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21:823-831.
74. Dérand T. Stress analysis of cemented or resin bonded loaded porcelain inlays. Dent Mater 1991; 7:21-24.
75. Van Dijken JWV, Örmin A, Olofsson AL. Clinical performance of pressed inlays luted with resin-modified glass ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:529-535.
76. Mitchel CA, Douglas WH, Cheng YS. Fracture toughness of conventional resin modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 1999; 15:7-13.
77. Friedl K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A, Shams M. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105:81-85.
78. McComb D. Adhesive luting cements: classes, criteria, and usage. Compendium 1996; 17:759-773.
79. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents of fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:135-141.
80. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:280-301.
81. Strang R, McCrosson J, Muirhead GM, Richardson AS. The setting of visible-light-cured resins beneath etched porcelain veneers. Br Dent J 1987; 163:149-151.
82. Linden JJ, Swift EJ Jr, Boyer DB, Davis BK. Photoactivation of resin cements through porcelain veneers. J Dent Res 1991; 70:154-157.
83. Blackman R, Barghi N, Duke E. Influence of the ceramic thickness on the polymerization of light-cured resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63:295-300.
84. Cardash HS, Bharav H, Pillo R, Bem-Hamar A. The effect of porcelain color on the hardness of luting composite resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:620-623.
85. El-Badrawy WA, El-Mowafy OM. Chemical versus dual curing of resin inlay cements. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:515-524.
86. El-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH, El-Badrawy WA. Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay. Oper Dent 1999; 24:38-44.
87. Braga RR, Ballester RY, Carrilho MR. Pilot study on the early shear strength of porcelain-dentin bonding using dual cure cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:285-289.
88. Scurria MS, Powers JM. Surface roughness of two polished ceramic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:74-77.
89. Giordano R, Cima M, Pober R. Effect of surface finish on the flexural strength of feldspathic and aluminous dental ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8:311-319.
90. Roulet JF. The longevity of glass ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 1995; 74:405. (Abstr)
91. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Bey B. Clinical and quantitative marginal analysis of feldspathic ceramic inlays at 4 years. Clin Oral Investig 1997; 1:63-68.
92. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam - results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Investig 1997; 1:40-46.
93. Berg NG, Dérand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997; 21:121-127.
94. Fuzzi M, Rappelli G. Survival rate of ceramic inlays. J Dent 1998; 26:623-626.
95. Studer S, Lehner C, Schärer P. Seven year results of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic. J Dent Res 1998; 77(Spec Issue):803. (Abstr)
96. Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - a clinical study. J Dent 1999; 27:325-331.
97. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaliation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13:194-200.