Cumulative effects of successive restorative procedures on anterior crown flexure: Intact versus veneered incisors

Quintessence International

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 5-18

  Magne, Pascal ^a,b   Douglas, William H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Anterior tooth; Flexure; Resin composite restoration; Stiffness; Veneer

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTURE; ELASTICITY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; INCISOR; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLIABILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL VENEERS; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ELASTICITY; HUMANS; INCISOR; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PLIABILITY; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH CROWN;

EID: 0033765963     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Rationalization of incisor shape: Experimental-numerical analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81;345-355.
2. Magne P, Douglas WH. Rationalization of esthetic restorative dentistry based on biomimetics. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:5-15.
3. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;68:405-411.
4. Cameron CE. The cracked tooth syndrome: Additional findings. J Am Dent Assoc 1976;93:971-975.
5. Cavel WT, Kelsey WP, Blankenau RJ. An in vivo study of cuspal fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:38-42.
6. Hood JAA. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials. St Paul, MN: 3M, 1985:443-450.
7. Douglas WH. Methods to improve fracture resistance of teeth. In: Vanherle G, Smith DC (eds). International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Materials. St Paul, MN: 3M, 1985:433-441.
8. Morin DL, Douglas WH, Cross M, DeLong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Experimental strain measurements. Dent Mater 1988;4:41-48.
9. Morin DL, Cross M, Voller VR, Douglas WH, DeLong R. Biophysical stress analysis of restored teeth: Modelling and analysis. Dent Mater 1988;4:77-84.
10. Malcolm PJ, Hood JAA. The effect of cast restorations in reducing cusp flexibility in restored teeth [abstract]. J Dent Res 1971;56:D207.
11. Reeh ES, Douglas WH, Messer HH. Stiffness of endodontically-treated teeth related to restoration technique. J Dent Res 1989;68:1540-1544.
12. Linn J, Messer HH. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1994; 20:479-485.
13. Morin D, DeLong R, Douglas WH. Cusp reinforcement by the acid-etch technique. J Dent Res 1984;63:1075-1078.
14. McCullock AJ, Smith BG. In vitro studies of cusp reinforcement with adhesive restorative material. Br Dent J 1986; 161:450-452.
15. Macpherson LC, Smith BG. Reinforcement of weakened cusps by adhesive restorative materials: An in-vitro study. Br Dent J 1995;178:341-344.
16. Douglas WH. The esthetic motif in research and clinical practice. Quintessence Int 1989;20:739-745.
17. Reeh ES, Ross GK. Tooth stiffness with composite veneers: A strain gauge and finite element evaluation. Dent Mater 1994;10:247-252.
18. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Celis JP, Vanherle G. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992;8:310-319.
19. Craig RG, Peyton FA, Johnson DW. Compressive properties of enamel, dental cements, and gold. J Dent Res 1961;40: 936-945.
20. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: Dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-121.
21. Baratieri NL, et al. Direct Adhesive Restorations on Fractured Anterior Teeth, ed 2. Santiago, Chile: Quintessence, 1998.
22. Magne P, Dietschi D, Holz J. Esthetic restorations for posterior teeth: Practical and clinical considerations. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996;16:104-119.
23. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive Metal-free Restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997:61-77.
24. Belser UC, Magne P, Magne M. Ceramic laminate veneers: Continuous evolution of indications. J Esthet Dent 1997; 9:197-207.
25. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Its effect on the bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-119.
26. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: A modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1997;17:536-545.
27. Ferrari M, Patroni S, Balleri P. Measurement of enamel thickness in relation to reduction for etched laminate veneers. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:407-413.
28. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater 1996;12:290-294.
29. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials, ed 6. St Louis: Mosby, 1980:55, 76.
30. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod 1989;15:512-516.
31. Ciucchi B, Bouillaguet S, Delaloye M, Holz J. Volume of the internal gap formed under composite restorations in vitro. J Dent 1997;25:305-312.
32. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998;26:1-20.
33. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-1042.
34. Ferdianakis K. Microleakage reduction from newer esthetic restorative materials in permanent molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1998;22:221-229.
35. Leinfelder K. Current developments in materials and techniques. Presented at the Star of the North Meeting (Minnesota Dental Association), Minneapolis, 26 April 1999.
36. Swift EJ Jr, Triolo PT Jr, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives. Am J Dent 1996;9:100-104.
37. Tjan AH, Castelnuovo J, Liu P. Bond strength of multi-step and simplified-step systems. Am J Dent 1996;9:269-272.
38. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998;23:69-76.
39. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
40. Sedgley CM, Messer HH. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? J Endod 1992;18:332-335.
41. Papa J, Cain C, Messer HH. Moisture content of vital vs. endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1994;10:91-93.
42. Andreasen FM, Daugaard-Jensen J, Munksgaard EC. Reinforcement of bonded crown fractured incisors with porcelain veneers. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7:78-83.
43. Roulet JF, Soderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-387.
44. Hayakawa T, Horie K, Aida M, Kanaya H, Kobayashi T, Murata Y. The influence of surface conditions and silane agents on the bond of resin to dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1992;8:238-240.
45. Magne P, Kwon KR, Belser UC, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Crack propensity of porcelain laminate veneers: A simulated operatory evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81: 327-334.
46. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81: 335-344.
47. Stokes AAN, Hood JAA. Impact fracture characteristics of intact and crowned human central incisors. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:89-95.