A Randomized 5-Year Clinical Evaluation of 3 Ceramic Inlay Systems

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 194-200

  Molin, Margareta K ^a,c   Karlsson, Stig L ^b  

^a Nordisk Institutt for Odontologiske Materialer   (Norway)

^b Institute of Clinical Odontology   (Norway)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; CEREC; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS; GOLD ALLOY; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; MIRAGE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH BRUSHING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL POLISHING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; INLAYS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0034188986     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Rosenblom MA, Schulman A. A review of all-ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:297-307.
2. Qualthrough AJE, Piddock V. Ceramics update. J Dent 1997; 25:91-95.
3. Denry IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:134-143.
4. van Dijken JWV, Höglund-Åberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: A 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-225.
5. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Short-term results of IPS Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996;5:277-287.
6. Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:145-149.
7. Isidor F, Bröndum K. A clinical evaluation of porcelain inlays. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:140-144.
8. Gladys S, van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle C. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems. J Dent 1995; 23:329-338.
9. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Hörsted-Bindslev P. Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:147-153.
10. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-206.
11. Silness J. Periodontal conditions in patients treated with dental bridges. J Periodontol 1970;5:60-68.
12. Lenox JA, Kopczyk RA. A clinical system for scoring a patient's oral hygiene performance. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;86:849-852.
13. California Dental Association. Quality Evaluation for Dental Care. Guidelines for the Assessment of Clinical Quality and Professional Performance. Los Angeles: CDA, 1977.
14. Karlsson S, Molin M. Effects of gold and bonded ceramic inlays on the ability to perceive occlusal thickness. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22:9-13.
15. Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years - A clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:333-339.
16. Berg NG, Dérand T. A 5-year evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec). Swed Dent J 1997;21:121-127.
17. Milleding P, Örtengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: Some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:571-580.
18. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-460.
19. Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JWV. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:263-267.
20. van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Marginal breakdown of fired ceramic inlays cemented with glass polyalkeonate (ionomer) cement or resin composite. J Dent 1994;22:265-272.
21. Rasmusson C-G, Lundin S-Å. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
22. El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW, Benmergui C, Levinton C. Meta-analysis on long-term clinical performance of posterior composite restorations. J Dent 1994;22:33-43.