The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 538-542

  Behr, Michael ^a   Rosentritt, Martin ^a   Mangelkramer, Martin ^a   Handel, Gerhard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUGENOL; GLASS FIBER; RESIN; TOOTH CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; DENTURE; EVALUATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; TOOTH CROWN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEMENTATION; CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; GLASS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 0141959038     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Smith DC. Dental cements. Current status and future prospects. Dent Clin North Am 1983;6:763-792.
2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics, ed 2. Chicago: Quintessence, 1981:378-382.
3. Yoshinari T, Dérand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:329-338.
4. Bernal G, Jones RM, Brown DZ, Muñoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:286-290.
5. Thompson JY, Rapp MM, Parker AJ. Microscopic and energy dispersive x-ray analysis of surface adaptation of dental cements to dental ceramic surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:378-383.
6. Loose M, Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Behr M, Handel G. In-vitro study of fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures. Eur J Prosthodont Restorative Dent 1998;6:55-62.
7. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Ledwinsky L, Handel G. Fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of conventionally cemented fiber-reinforced composite three-unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:467-472.
8. Inoue S, Van Meerbeck B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. In: Advanced Adhesive Dentistry. Third International Kuraray Symposium, Granada. Düsseldorf, Germany: Kuraray, 1999:132-147.
9. Van Meerbeck B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994;73:1690-1702.
10. White SN, Yu Z. Compressive strength and diametral tensile strength of current adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:568-572.
11. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:135-141.
12. Scharnagl P. Simulation der Physiologischen Zahnbeweglichkeit bei der In-Vitro-Belastungsprüfung Dentaler Restaurationen im "Regensburger Kausimulator." Untersuchung am Beispiel Vollkeramischer In-Ceram-Brücken [thesis]. University of Regensburg, Germany, 1998.
13. Rosentritt M, Leibrock A, Lang R, Behr M, Handel G. Gerät zur Simulation des Kauorganes (Kausimulator). Materialprufung 1977;39:77-80.
14. Behr M, Hindelang U, Rosentritt M, Lang G, Handel G. Comparison of failure rates of adhesive-fixed partial dentures for in vivo and in vitro studies. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:25-30.
15. Roulet JF, Reich T, Blunck U, Noack MJ. Quantitative margin analysis in the scanning electron microscope. Scan Microsc 1998;3:147-159.
16. Steinbrenner H, Eickholtz P, Staehle HJ. Zur Reproduzierbarkeit der qualitativen und quantitativen Randspaltanalyse. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1995;50:920-923.
17. Ekfeldt A, Flöystrand F, Öilo G. Replica technique for in vivo studies of tooth surfaces and prosthetic materials. Scand J Dent Res 1985;93:560-565.
18. Ivoclar Wissenschaftliche Dokumentation Variolink II. Forschung + Entwicklung. Wissenschaftlicher Dienst. Schaan, Leichtenstein: Ivoclar-Vivadent, 1997.
19. Van Dijken JW, Örmin A, Olofsson AL. Clinical performance of pressed ceramic inlays luted with resin-modified ionomer and autopolymerizing resin composite cements. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:529-535.
20. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, Shen C. Microtensile strength of composite bonded to hot-pressed ceramics. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:305-313.
21. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG, Belser UC, Meyer JM. Effect of cement film thickness on the fracture resistance of a machinable glass-ceramic. Dent Mater 1994;10:172-177.
22. Sidhu SK, Sheriff M, Watson TF. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass ionomer restorations. J Dent Res 1997;76:1495-1501.
23. Yap AU. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: A comparison of water sorption characteristics. Biomaterials 1996;17:1897-1900.
24. Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1983;62:590-592.
25. Rosentritt M, Plein T, Kolbeck C, Behr M, Handel G. In vitro fracture force and marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns fixed on natural and artificial teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:387-391.
26. Alani AH, Toh CG. Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review. Oper Dent 1997;22:185-190.