The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 58-63

  Mjör, Ivar A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amalgam; Clinical survey; Composite; Glass ionomer materials; Operative dentistry

Indexed keywords

DENTAL ALLOY; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; RECURRENT DISEASE; RETREATMENT; RISK; SURFACE PROPERTY; SWEDEN; TIME;

ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GENERAL PRACTICE, DENTAL; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; ODDS RATIO; RECURRENCE; RETREATMENT; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SWEDEN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0038336023     PISSN: 00016357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00016359709091943     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mjör IA. Selection of restorative materials in general dental practice in Sweden. Acta Odontol Scand 1997;55:53-57.
2. Mjor IA. Orsaker till revision av fyllningar Tandlakartidn 1979;71:552-6.
3. Mjör IA. Revision av fyllningar. Tandlakartidn 1980;72:375-80.
4. Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981;6:49-54.
5. Klausner LH, Charbeneau GT. Amalgam restorations: a cross-sectional survey of placement and replacement. J Michigan Dent Assoc 1985;67:249-52.
6. Klausner LH, Green TG, Charbeneau GT. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations: a challenge for the profession. Oper Dent 1987;12:105-12.
7. Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:297-303.
8. Qvist V, Qvist J, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990;48:305-11.
9. Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:70-3.
10. Mjör IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of resin based composite restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992;17:82-5.
11. Mjör IA, Um CM. Survey of amalgam and composite restorations in Korea. Int Dent J 1993;43:311-6.
12. Pink FE, Minden NJ, Simmonds S. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general dental practice settings. Oper Dent 1994;19:127-32.
13. Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1994;19:228-32.
14. Friedl K-H, Hiller K-A, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995;20:34-8.
15. Healey HJ, Phillips RW. A clinical study of amalgam failures. J Dent Res 1949;28:439-46.
16. Knibbs PJ. Glass ionomer cement: 10 years of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:103-15.
17. Koch G, Hatibovic-Kofman G. Glass ionomer cements as a fluoride release system in vivo. Swed Dent J 1990;14:267-73.
18. Hattab FN, El-Mowafy OM, Salem NS, El-Badrawy WAG. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:221-4.
19. Mjör IA. Glass ionomer restorations and secondary caries. A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996;27:171-4.
20. Mjör IA. Direct posterior filling materials. In: Vannerle G, Derange M, Willems G, editors. State-of-the-art on direct posterior filling materials and dentine bonding. Leuven: van der Poorten, 1993:1-13.
21. Mjör IA. The Long term cost of restorative therapy using different materials. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:60-5.
22. Letzel H, van t'Hof MA, Vrijhoef MMA, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Failure, survival, and reasons for replacement of amalgam restorations. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence Publ. Co., 1989:83-92.
23. Merrett MCW, Elderton RJ. An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and secondary caries. Br Dent J 1984;12:169-72.
24. Rytömaa I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Lind K. Clinical assessment of amalgam fillings. Community Dent Oral Epidermiol 1984;157:128-33.
25. Söderholm KJ, Antonson DE, Fischlschweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence Publ. Co , 1989:93-108.
26. Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991;41:359-64.
27. Mjör IA, Qvist V. Marginal failures of amalgam and composite restorations. J Dent 1996. In press.
28. Tyas MJ. Cario-static effect of glass-ionomer cement. Autr Dent J 1991;36:236-9.
29. Jokstad, A, Mjor IA. Replacement reasons and service time of class II amalgam restorations in relation to cavity design. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:109-26.
30. Boyd MA. Amalgam replacement: are decisions based on fact or tradition? In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence Publ. Co., 1989:73-80.
31. Hamilton JC, Moffa JP, Ellison JA, Jenkins WA. Marginal fracture not a predictor of longevity for two dental amalgam alloys: a ten-year study. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:200-2.
32. Osborn JW, Norman RD, Gale EN. A 14-year clinical assessment of 12 amalgam alloys. Quintessence Int 1991;22:857-64.
33. Smales RJ, Webster DA, Leppard PI. Survival predictions of four types of dental restorative materials. J Dent 1991;19:278-82.
34. Smales RJ, Hawthorne WS. Long-term survival and cost-effectiveness of five dental restorative materials used in various classes of cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1996;46:126-30.
35. Stanford JW. Future of materials and materials research. Adv Dent Res 1988;2:187-92.
36. Tyas MJ. Dental materials science - the maintenance of standards. J Oral Rehabil 1992;18:105-10.