Clinical performance of large, all-ceramic CAD/CAM-generated restorations after three years: A pilot study

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 135, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 605-612

  Reich, Svem M ^a   Wichmann, Manfred ^a   Rinne, Heiner ^a,b   Shortall, Adrian ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b University of Birmingham ^*

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; ENAMEL; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEIGHT; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; PATHOLOGICAL ANATOMY; PATIENT; PERFORMANCE; PILOT STUDY; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH; TOOTH COLOR; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

EID: 2642552873     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0248     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Finger WJ, Fritz U. Laboratory evaluation of one-component/dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1996;9:206-10.
2. Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of thermal cycling on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. Am J Dent 1998;11(3):118-22.
3. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-30.
4. Qualtrough AJ, Wilson NH. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a porcelain inlay system. J Dent 1996;24:317-23.
5. Molin M, Karlsson S. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of a ceramic (Optec) inlay system. Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54(3):145-9.
6. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Saller A. In-vivo evaluation of a feldspathic ceramic system: 2-year results. J Dent 1996;24(1-2):25-31.
7. Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after six years: clinical behavior. Oper Dent 2000;25:459-65.
8. Reiss B, Walther W. Clinical long-term results and 10-year Kaplan-Meier analysis of Cerec restorations. Int J Comput Dent 2000;3(1):9-23.
9. Kramer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years: a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-31.
10. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:241-9.
11. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD. Preparations for intracoronal restorations. In: Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1981:131-42.
12. Arnetzl G, Haas M, Pertl C, Penkner K, Polz MH. Occlusal surface. In: Mörmann WH, ed. CAD/CIM in aesthetic dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1996:361-8.
13. Ryge G, Cvar JF. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco: U.S. Public Health Service; 1971. PHS publication 790-244.
14. Isenberg BP, Essig ME, Leinfelder KF. Three-year clinical evaluation of CAD/CAM restorations. J Esthet Dent 1992;4(5):173-6.
15. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 2001;32(3):199-205.
16. van Dijken JW, Hoglund-Aberg C, Olofsson AL. Fired ceramic inlays: a 6-year follow up. J Dent 1998;26:219-25.
17. Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Alkumru HN. A clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays bonded with different luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:273-83.
18. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater (in press).
19. Mehta NR, Forgione AG, Maloney G, Greene R. Different effects of nocturnal parafunction on the masticatory system: the weak link theory. Cranio 2000;18:280-6.