A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: Efficiency and short-term effectiveness

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 349-354

  Kuijs, Ruud H ^a   Fennis, Willem M M ^a   Kreulen, Cees M ^a   Roeters, F Joost M ^a   Creugers, Nico H J ^a   Burgersdijk, Rob C W ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLEARFIL AP X; CLEARFIL AP-X; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; URETHANETRIMETHACRYLATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENAMEL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INJURY; MALE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME; TOOTH FRACTURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BICUSPID; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; METHACRYLATES; MIDDLE AGED; POLYURETHANES; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TOOTH FRACTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746872943     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Eakle WS, Maxwell EH, Braly BV. Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. J Am Dent Assoc 1986;112:215-218.
2. Gilbert GH, Antonson DE, Mjor IA, et al. Coronal caries, root fragments, and restoration and cusp fractures in US adults. Caries Res 1996;30:101-111.
3. Allander L, Birkhed D, Bratthall D. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice. Swed Dent J 1990;14:179-184.
4. Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJM, Creugers NHJ, Burgersdijk RCW. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:559-563.
5. Bader JD, Martin JA, Shugars DA. Incidence rates for complete cusp fracture. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:346-353.
6. Murray PE, About I, Lumley PJ, Smith G, Franquin JC, Smith AJ. Postoperative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:321-329.
7. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
8. van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11-year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
9. Fennis WMM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NHJ. Fatigue resistance of teeth restored with cuspal-coverage composite restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:313-317.
10. Kuijs RH, Fennis WMM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJM, Verdonschot N, Creugers NHJ. A comparison of fatigue resistance of three materials for cusp-replacing adhesive restorations. J Dent 2006;34:19-25.
11. Kuijs RH, Fennis WMM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJM, Burgersdijk RCW. Fracture strength of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16:13-16.
12. Krejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. J Dent Res 1994;73: 1228-1232.
13. Macpherson LC, Smith BGN. Replacement of missing cusps: An in-vitro study. J Dent 1994;22:118-120.
14. Kuijs RH, Fennis WMM, Kreulen CM, Barink M, Verdonschot N. Does layering minimize shrinkage stresses in composite restorations? J Dent Res 2003;82:966-970.
15. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frenken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry-A review. Int Dent J 2000;50:1-12.
16. Burrow MF, Nikaido T, Satoh M, Tagami J. Early bonding of resin cements to dentin. Effect of bonding environment. Oper Dent 1996;21:196-202.
17. Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Nikaido T, et al. Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation. Dent Mater 1995;11:298-304.
18. Reeves GW, Lentz DL, O'Hara JW, McDaniel MD, Tobert WE. Comparison of marginal adaptation between direct and indirect composites. Oper Dent 1992;17:210-214.
19. Miller SC. Textbook of Periodontia, ed 2. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1948.
20. Loomans BAC, Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Bronkhorst EM, Burgersdijk RCW, Dörfer CE. A randomized clinical trial on proximal contacts of posterior composites. J Dent 2006;34:292-297.
21. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28:135-144.
22. Haller B, Günther J. Randqualität von Klasse-II- Kompomerfüllungen. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z 1998;53:330-336.
23. Prati C, Chersoni S, Montebugnoli L, Montanari G. Effect of air, dentin and resin-based composite thickness on light intensity reduction. Am J Dent 1999;12:231-234.
24. Dijken JWV van, Hörstedt P. Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched enamel. Acta Odontol Scand 1987;45:303-308.
25. Smales RJ. Rubber dam usage related to restoration quality and survival. Br Dent J 1993;174:330-333.
26. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ , Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.