Incorporating molecular evolution into phylogenetic analysis, and a new compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers for animal mitochondrial DNA

Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Volumn 37, Issue , 2006, Pages 545-579

  Simon, Chris ^a,b   Buckley, Thomas R ^c   Frati, Francesco ^d   Stewart, James B ^e,f   Beckenbach, Andrew T ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^c LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^e SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^f KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Among site rate variation; Covarion like evolution; Molecular clocks; mtDNA genomes; Nodal support; PCR primers

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33845385936     PISSN: 1543592X     EISSN: 15452069     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110018     Document Type: Review

References (199)

1. Adachi J, Hasegawa M. 1996. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:459-68
2. Alexandrino J, Baird SJ, Lawson L, Macey JR, Moritz C, Wake DB. 2005. Strong selection against hybrids at a hybrid zone in the Ensatina ring species complex and its evolutionary implications. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59:1334-47
3. Arbogast BS, Edwards SV, Wakeley J, Beerli P, Slowinski JB. 2002. Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:707-40
4. Arensburger P, Buckley TR, Simon C, Moulds M, Holsinger KE. 2004. Biogeography and phylogeny of the New Zealand cicada genera (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA data. J. Biogeogr. 31:557-69
5. Aris-Brosou S. 2003. How Bayes tests of molecular phylogenies compare with frequentist approaches. Bioinformatics 19:618-24
6. Aris-Brosou S, Yang Z. 2002. The effects of models of rate evolution on estimation of divergence dates with a special reference to the metazoan 18S rRNA phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:703-14
7. Avise JC. 2000. Phylogeograpby: The History and Formation of Species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
8. Ballard JWO, Rand DM. 2005. The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:621-42
9. Barker FK, Lutzoni FM. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:625-37
10. Bensasson D, Zhang X, Hartl DL, Hewitt GM. 2001. Mitochondrial pseudogenes: evolution's misplaced witnesses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:314-21
11. Birky CWJ. 2001. The inheritance of genes in mitochondria and chloroplasts: laws, mechanisms, and models. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35:125-48
12. Bollback JP. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1171-80
13. Boore JL. 2000. The duplication/random loss model for gene rearrangement exemplified by mitochondrial genomes of deuterostome animals. In Comparative Genomics, ed. D Sankoff, JH Nadeau, pp. 133-47. Netherlands: Kluwer
14. Boore JL, Lavrov D, Brown WM. 1998. Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 393:667-68
15. Boore JL, Macey JR, Medina M. 2005. Sequencing and comparing whole mitochondrial genomes of animals. Methods Enzymol. 395:311-48
16. Brandley MC, Schmitz AS, Reeder TW. 2005. Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst. Biol. 54:373-90
17. Bromham L, Eyre-Walker A, Smith NH, Maynard Smith J. 2003. Mitochondrial Steve: paternal inheritance of mitochondria in humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:2-4
18. Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC. 1982. Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. J. Mol. Evol. 18:225-39
19. Buckley TR. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:509-23
20. Buckley TR, Arensburger P, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18
21. Buckley TR, Cordeiro M, Marshall DC, Simon C. 2006. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55:411-25
22. Buckley TR, Cunningham CW. 2002. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:394-402
23. Buckley TR, Simon C, Chambers GK. 2001a. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework using empirical data: effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths and bootstrap support. Syst. Biol. 50:67-86
24. Buckley TR, Simon C, Shimodaira H, Chambers GK. 2001b. Evaluating hypotheses on the origin and evolution of the New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada) using multiple comparison tests of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:223-34
25. Bull JJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Cunningham CW, Swofford DL, Waddell PJ. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-97
26. Bullerwell CE, Gray MW. 2004. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome: protist connections to animals, fungi and plants. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 7:528-34
27. Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF. 2003. Mitochondrial genomes: Anything goes. Trends Genet. 19:709-16
28. Carapelli A, Nardi K, Dallai R, Frati F. 2006. A review of molecular data for the phylogeny of basal hexapods. Pedobiologia 50:191-204
29. Carstens BC, Brunsfeld SJ, Demboski JR, Good JM, Sullivan J. 2005a. Investigating the evolutionary history of the Pacific Northwest mesic forest ecosystem: hypothesis testing within a comparative phylogeographic framework. Evolution 59:1639-52
30. Carstens BC, Demboski JR, Good JM, Brunsfeld SJ, Sullivan J. 2005b. The evolutionary history of the northern Rocky Mountain mesic forest ecosystem. Evolution 59:1639-52
31. Castoe TA, Doan TM, Parkinson CL. 2004. Data partitions and complex models in Bayesian analysis: the phylogeny of gymnophthalmid lizards. Syst. Biol. 53:448-59
32. Caterino MS, Cho S, Sperling FAH. 2000. The current state of insect molecular systematics: a thriving tower of Babel. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45:1-54
33. Collins T, Fedrigo O, Naylor GJP. 2005. Choosing the best genes for the job: the case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 54:493-500
34. Cook CE, Yue Q, Akam M. 2005. Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 272:1295-304
35. Cummings MP, Handley SA, Myers DS, Reed RL, Rokas A, Winka K. 2003. Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case. Syst. Mol. 52:477-87
36. Cunningham CW. 1997. Is congruence between data partitions a reliable predictor of phylogenetic accuracy? Empirically testing an iterative procedure for choosing among phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 46:464-78
37. DeBry RW. 2005. The systematic component of phylogenetic error as a function of taxonomic sampling under parsimony. Syst. Biol. 54:432-40
38. Delsuc F, Phillips MJ, Penny D. 2003. Comment on "Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?" Science 301:1482d
39. Douady CJ, Delsue F, Boucher Y, Doolittle WF, Douzery EJP. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:248-54
40. Dowton M, Austin AD. 1995. Increased genetic diversity in mitochondrial genes is correlated with the evolution of parasitism in the Hymenoptera. J. Mol. Evol. 41:958-65
41. Dowton M, Campbell NJH. 2001. Intramitochondrial recombination-is it why some mitochondrial genes deep around? Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:269-71
42. Dowton M, Castro LR, Campbell SL, Bargon SD, Austin AD. 2003. Frequent mitochondrial gene rearrangements at the hymenopteran nad3-nad5 junction. J. Mol. Evol. 56:517-26
43. Edwards SV, Beerli P. 2000. Perspective: gene divergence, population divergence, and the variation in coalescence time in phylogeographic studies. Evolution 54:1839-54
44. Efron B, Halloran E, Holmes S. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-34
45. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-10
46. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-76
47. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-91
48. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring Phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer. 664 pp
49. Felsenstein J, Kishino H. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst. Biol. 42:193-200
50. Fitch WM. 1986. The estimate of total nucleotide substitutions from pairwise differences is biased. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B 312:317-24
51. Fitch WM, Margoliash E. 1967. A method for estimating the number of invariant amino acid coding positions in a gene using cytochrome c as a model case. Biochem. Genet. 1:65-71
52. Fitch WM, Markowitz E. 1970. An unproved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genet. 4:579-93
53. Funk DJ, Omland KE. 2003. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:397-423
54. Galtier N. 2001. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis under a covarion-like model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:866-73
55. Gaucher EA, Miyamoto MM, Benner SA. 2001. Function-structure analysis of proteins using covarion-based evolutionary approaches: elongation factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:548-52
56. Gillooly JF, Allen AP, West GB, Brown JH. 2005. The rate of DNA evolution: effects of body size and temperature on the molecular clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:140-45
57. Goldman N, Anderson JP, Rodrigo AG. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-70
58. Goto SG, Kimura MT. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial COI and nuclear Gpdh genes in Drosophila. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:404-22
59. Gribaldo S, Casane D, Lopez P, Philippe H. 2003. Functional divergence prediction from evolutionary analysis: a case study of vertebrate hemoglobin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1754-59
60. Guindon S, Rodrigo AG, Dyer KA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2004. Modeling the site-specific variation of selection patterns along lineages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 35:12957-62
61. Guo X, Liu SJ, Liu Y. 2006. Evidence for recombination of mitochondrial DNA in triploid crucian carp. Genetics 172:1745-49
62. Gutell RR, Lee JC, Cannone JJ. 2002. The accuracy of ribosomal RNA comparative structure models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:301-10
63. Haddrath OP, Baker AJ. 2001. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences of extinct birds: ratite phylogenetics and the vicariance biogeography hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:939-45
64. Hassanin A. 2006. Phylogeny of Arthropoda inferred from mitochondrial sequences: strategies for limiting the misleading effects of multiple changes in pattern and rates of substitutions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38:100-16
65. Hassanin A, Léger N, Deutsch J. 2005. Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic inferences. Syst. Biol. 54:277-98
66. Hedges SB, Kumar S. 2003. Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. Trends Genet. 19:200-6
67. Hedtke SM, Townsend TM, Hillis DM. 2006. Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling. Syst. Biol. 55:522-29
68. Hickson RE, Simon C, Cooper A, Spicer GS, Sullivan J, Penny D. 1996. Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:150-69
69. Hillis DM. 1996. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383:130-31
70. Hillis DM, Bull JJ. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-92
71. Hillis DM, Pollock D, McGuire JA, Zwickl DJ. 2003. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst. Biol. 52:124-26
72. Ho SY, Phillips MJ, Drummond AJ, Cooper A. 2005. Accuracy of rate estimation using relaxed-clock models with a critical focus on the early metazoan radiation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1355-63
73. Holder M, Lewis PO. 2003. Phylogeny estimation: traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:275-84
74. Holder MT. 2001. Using a complex model of sequence evolution to evaluate and improve phylogenetics methods. PhD thesis. Univ. Texas, Austin. 165 pp.
75. Holmes S. 2005. Statistical approach to tests involving phylogenetic trees. In Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny, ed. O Gascuel, pp. 91-121. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
76. Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM, Nielsen R. 1996. A likelihood ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:546-58
77. Huelsenbeck JP, Imennov NS. 2002. Geographic origin of human mitochondrial DNA: accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty and model comparison. Syst. Biol. 51:155-65
78. Huelsenbeck JP, Jain S, Frost SWD, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2006. A Dirichlet process model for detecting positive selection in protein-coding DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:6263-68
79. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-88
80. Huelsenbeck JP, Nielsen R. 1999. Effect of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy. Syst. Biol. 48:317-28
81. Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under complex and simple substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53:904-13
82. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-55
83. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-14
84. Jennings WB, Edwards SV. 2005. Speciational history of Australian grass finches (Poephila) inferred from 30 gene trees. Eur. Int. J. Org. Evol. 59:2033-47
85. Jermiin L, Ho SYW, Ababneh F, Robinson J, Larkum AWD. 2004. The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol. 53:638-43
86. Johannes GJ, Berger EG. 1993. Domains within the mammalian ornithine decarboxylase messenger RNA have evolved independently and episodically. J. Mol. Evol. 36:555-67
87. Jordan S, Simon C, Polhemus D. 2003. Molecular systematics and adaptive radiation of Hawaii's endemic damselfly genus Megalagrion (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Syst. Biol. 52:89-109
88. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, ed. N Munro, pp. 21-132. New York: Academic
89. Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-95
90. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-79
91. Kishino H, Thorne JL, Bruno WJ. 2001. Performance of a divergence time estimation method under a probabilistic model of rate evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:352-61
92. Kjer K. 2004. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 53:506-14
93. Kjer KM, Blahnik RJ, Holzenthal RW. 2001. Phylogeny of Trichoptera (Caddisflies): characterisation of signal within multiple datasets. Syst. Biol. 50:781-816
94. Kocher TD, Thomas WK, Meyer A, Edwards SV, Pääbo S, et al. 1989. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:6196-200
95. Kumar S, Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. MEGA: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis. Version 1.0. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University
96. Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-59
97. Larget B, Simon DL, Kadane JB, Sweet D. 2005. A Bayesian analysis of metazoan mitochondrial genome rearrangements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:486-95
98. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1109
99. Lavrov DV, Boore TL, Brown WM. 2002. Complete mtDNA sequences of two millipedes suggest a new model for mitochondrial gene rearrangement: duplication and nonrandom loss. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:163-69
100. Leache A, Reeder T. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus andulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51:44-68
101. Lemmon AR, Moriarty EC. 2004. The importance of proper model assumption in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 53:265-77
102. Lewis PO, Holder MT, Holsinger KE. 2005. Polytomies and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 54:241-53
103. Lin C-P, Danforth BN. 2004. How do insect nuclear and mitochondrial gene substitution patterns differ? Insights from Bayesian analyses of combined datasets. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30:686-702
104. Lió P, Goldman N. 2002. Modeling mitochondrial protein evolution using structural information. J. Mol. Evol. 54:519-29
105. Lockhart PJ, Howe CJ, Bryant DA, Beanland TJ, Larkum AWD. 1992. Substitutional bias confounds inference of cyanelle origins from sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 34:153-62
106. Lockhart PJ, Huson D, Maier U, Fraunholz MJ, Van de Peer Y, et al. 2000. How molecules evolve in Eubacteria. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:835-38
107. Lockhart PJ, Larkum AWD, Steel MA, Waddell PJ, Penny D. 1996. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: the problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1930-34
108. Lockhart PJ, Steel MA, Barbrook AC, Huson DH, Charleston MA, Howe CJ. 1998. A covariotide model explains apparent phylogenetic structure of oxygenic photosynthetic lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1183-88
109. Lopez, P, Casane D, Philippe H. 2002. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1-7
110. Lopez P, Forterre P, Philippe H. 1999. The root of the tree of life in the light of the covarion model. J. Mol. Evol. 49:496-508
111. Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst. Biol. 49:628-51
112. Macey JR, Papenfuss TJ, Kuhel JV, Fourcade HM, Boore JL. 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among amphisbaenian reptiles based on complete mitochondrial genomic sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33:22-31
113. Machado CA, Hey J. 2003. The causes of phylogenetic conflict in a classic Drosophila species group. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 270:1193-202
114. Mantovani B, Passamonti M, Scali V. 2001. The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in Bacillus stick insects: ancestry of hybrids, androgenesis, and phylogenetic relationships. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19:157-63
115. Margoliash E, Smith E. 1965. Structural and functional aspects of cytochrome c in relation to evolution. In Evolving Genes and Proteins, ed V Bryson, IIJ Vogel. New York: Academic. 221 pp.
116. Marshall DC, Simon C, Buckley TR. 2006. Accurate branch length estimation in partitioned Bayesian analyses requires accommodation of among-partition rate variation and attention to branch length priors. Syst. Biol. In press
117. Meyer A, Zardoya R. 2003. Recent advances in the (molecular) phylogeny of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:311-38
118. Misof B, Anderson CL, Buckley TR, Erpenbeck D, Rickert A, Misof K. 2002. An empirical analysis of mt 16S rRNA covarion-like evolution in insects: site-specific rate variation is clustered and frequently detected. J. Mol. Evol. 55:460-69
119. Mitchell A, Mitter C, Regier JC. 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst. Biol. 49:202-24
120. Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. 1995. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:503-13
121. Moriyama EN, Powell JR. 1997. Synonymous substitution rates in Drosophila: mitochondrial versus nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 45:378-91
122. Muse SV, Gaut BS. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions rates, with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:1139-51
123. Nardi F, Spinsanti G, Boore JL, Carapelli A, Dallai R, Frati F. 2003. Hexapod origins: monophyletic or polyphyletic? Science 299:1887-89
124. Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JPP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53:47-67
125. Overton LC, Rhoads DD. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic relationships based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences for the Todies (Todus, Todidae) of the Caribbean. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 32:524-38
126. Pääbo S. 2003. The mosaic that is our genome. Nature 421:409-12
127. Page RDM, Holmes EC. 1998. Molecular Evolution. A Phylogenetic Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sci. 352 pp.
128. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequences or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-81
129. Passamonti M, Boore JL, Scali V. 2003. Molecular evolution and recombination in gender-associated mitochondrial DNAs of the Manila clam Tapes philippinarum. Genetics 164:603-11
130. Paton T, Haddrath O, Baker AJ. 2002. Complete mitochondrial DNA genome sequences show that modern birds are not descended from transitional shorebirds. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 269:839-46
131. Penny D, Hendy MD, Lockhart PJ, Steel MA. 1996. Corrected parsimony, minimum evolution and Hadamard conjugations. Syst. Biol. 45:593-603
132. Penny D, Hendy MD, Steel MA. 1992. Progress with evolutionary trees. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:73-79
133. Philippe H, Lecointre G, Van Le HL, Le Guyader H. 1996. A critical study of homoplasy in molecular data with the use of a morphologically based cladogram. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:1174-86
134. Philippe H, Lopez, P. 2001. On the conservation of protein sequences in evolution. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:414-16
135. Poe S. 2003. Evaluation of the strategy on long-branch subdivision to improve the accuracy of phylogenetic methods. Syst. Biol. 52:423-28
136. Pollock DD, Bruno WJ. 2000. Assessing an unknown evolutionary process: effect of increasing site-specific knowledge through taxon addition. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1854-58
137. Pollock DD, Zwickl DJ, McGuire JA, Hillis DM. 2002. Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51:664-71
138. Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst. Biol. 53:793-808
139. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-18
140. Rambaut A, Bromham L. 1998. Estimating divergence dates from molecular sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:442-48
141. Rand DM, Haney RA, Fry AJ. 2004. Cytonuclear coevolution: the genomics of cooperation. Trends Ecol. Biol. 19:645-53
142. Ren F, Yang Z. 2005. An empirical examination of the utility of codon-substitution models in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 54:808-18
143. Revell LJ, Harmon LJ, Glor RE. 2005. Underparameterized model of sequence evolution leads to bias in the estimation of diversification rates from molecular phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 54:973-83
144. Rokas A, Nylander JAA, Ronquist F, Stone GA. 2002. A maximum-likelihood analysis of eight phylogenetic markers in gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae): implications for insect phylogenetic studies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:206-19
145. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804
146. Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:10751-56
147. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, et al. 1985. Enzymatic amplification of B-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science 230:1350-54
148. Salamin N, Hodkinson TR, Savolainen V. 2005. Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera. Syst. Biol. 54:183-96
149. Sanderson MJ. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: a critique. Syst. Biol. 44:299-320
150. Sanderson MJ. 1997. A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:1218-31
151. Sanderson MJ. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:101-9
152. Sanderson MJ, Wojciechowski MF. 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 49:671-85
153. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-termination inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:5463-67
154. Scouras A, Beckenbach K, Arndt A, Smith MJ. 2004. Complete mitochondrial genome DNA sequence for two ophiuroids and a holothuroid: the utility of protein gene sequence and gene maps in the analyses of deep deuterostome phylogeny. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:50-65
155. Shao R, Dowton M, Murell A, Barker SC. 2003. Rates of gene rearrangement and nucleotide substitution are correlated in the mitochondrial genomes of insects. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1612-19
156. Shao R, Mitani H, Barker SC, Takahashi M, Fukunaga M. 2005. Novel mitochondrial gene content and gene arrangement indicate illegitimate intermtDNA recombination in the chigger mite, Leptotrombidium pallidum. J. Mol. Evol. 60:764-73
157. Shimodaira H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst. Biol. 51:492-508
158. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-16
159. Simon C. 1991. Molecular systematics at the species boundary: exploiting conserved and variable regions of the mitochondrial genome of animals via direct sequencing from enzymatically amplified DNA. In Molecular Techniques in Taxonomy, ed. GM Hewitt, AWB Johnston, JPW Young, H57:33-71. New York: Springer Verlag, NATO Advanced Studies Institute
160. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701
161. Simon C, Nigro L, Sullivan J, Holsinger K, Martin A, et al. 1996. Large differences in substitutional pattern and evolutionary rate of 12S ribosomal RNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:923-32
162. Smith AD, Lui TWH, Tillier ERM. 2004. Empirical models for substitution in ribosomal RNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:419-27
163. Springer MS, DeBry RW, Douady C, Amrine HM, Madsen O, et al. 2001. Mitochondrial versus nuclear gene sequences in deep-level mammalian phylogeny reconstruction. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:132-43
164. Springer MS, Douzery E. 1996. Secondary structure and patterns of evolution among mammalian mitochondrial 12S rRNA molecules. J. Mol. Evol. 43:357-73
165. Steel MA. 1994. Recovering a tree from the leaf colorations it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-24
166. Steel MA, Huson D, Lockhart PJ. 2000. Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 49:225-32
167. Suchard MA, Weiss RE, Sinsheimer JS. 2005. Models for estimating Bayes factors with applications to phylogeny and tests of monophyly. Biometrics 61:665-73
168. Sullivan J, Joyce P. 2005. Model selection in phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:445-66
169. Sullivan J, Swofford DL. 2001. Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? Syst. Biol. 50:723-29
170. Sunnucks P. 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:199-203
171. Susko E, Field C, Blouin C, Roger AJ. 2003. Estimation of rates-across-sites distributions in phylogenetic substitution models. Syst. Biol. 52:594-603
172. Susko E, Inagaki Y, Roger AJ. 2004. On inconsistency of the neighbor-joining, least squares, minimum evolution estimation when substitution processes are incorrectly modeled. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1629-42
173. Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overeredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:15138-43
174. Swofford DL. 1993/1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
175. Swofford DL, Olsen CJ, Waddell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In Molecular Systematics, ed. DM Hillis, CM Moritz, BK Mable, pp. 407-514. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer
176. Swofford DL, Waddell PJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Foster PG, Lewis PO, Rogers JS. 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50:525-39
177. Thalmann O, Hebler J, Poinar N, Pääbo S, Vigilant L. 2004. Unreliable mtDNA data due to nuclear insertions: a cautionary tale from analysis of humans and other great apes. Mol. Ecol. 13:321-35
178. Thorne JL, Kishino H, Painter IS. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1647-57
179. Tuffley C, Steel M. 1998. Modeling the covarion hypothesis of nucleotide substitution. Math. Biosci. 147:63-91
180. Venditti C, Meade A, Pagel M. 2006. Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 55:637-43
181. Waddell PJ, Kishino H, Ota R. 2002. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Genome Inform. 13:82-92
182. Weisburg WG, Giovannoni SJ, Woese CR. 1989. The Deinococcus and Thermum phylum and the effect of ribosomal RNA composition on phylogenetic tree construction. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 11:128-34
183. Welch JJ, Bromham L. 2005. Molecular dating when rates vary. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:320-27
184. Welch JJ, Fontanillas E, Bromham L. 2005. Molecular dates for the "Cambrian explosion": the influence of prior assumptions. Syst. Biol. 54:672-78
185. Wilcox TP, Zwickl DJ, Heath TA, Hillis DM. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:361-71
186. Yang Z. 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-72
187. Yang Z. 1997. PAML: a program for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:555-56
188. Yang Z. 2003. Adaptive molecular evolution. In Handbook of Statistical Genetics, ed. DJ Balding, M Bishop, C Cannings, pp. 229-54. New York: Wiley. 2nd ed.
189. Yang Z, Goldman N, Friday AE. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-24
190. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AMK. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-49
191. Yang Z, Rannala B. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain (Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-24
192. Yang Z, Rannala B. 2005. Branch-length prior influences Bayesian posterior probability of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54:455-70
193. Yang Z, Rannala B. 2006. Bayesian estimation of species divergence times under a molecular clock using fossil calibrations with soft bounds. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:212-26
194. Yoder AD, Yang Z. 2000. Estimation of primate speciation dates using local molecular clocks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1081-90
195. Zhang D-X, Hewitt GM. 1996. Nuclear integrations: challenges for mitochondrial DNA markers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:247-51
196. Zhang D-X, Hewitt GM. 2003. Nuclear DNA analyses in genetic studies of populations: practice, problems and prospects. Mol. Ecol. 12:563-84
197. Zwickl DJ. 2006. GARLI version 0.94. http://www.zo.utexas.edu/faculty/ antisense/Garli.html
198. Zwickl DJ, Hillis DM. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51:588-98
199. Sanderson MJ, Shaffer HB. 2002. Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:49-72