Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 673-688

  Huelsenbeck, John P ^a   Larget, Bret ^b   Miller, Richard E ^c   Ronquist, Fredrik ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bayesian inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Phylogeny; Posterior probability

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONFERENCE PAPER; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; GENETICS; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0036806280     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150290102366     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Aris-Brosou, S., and Z. Yang. 2002. Effects of models of rate evolution on estimation of divergence dates with special reference to the metazoan 18S ribosomal RNA phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:703-714.
2. Austin, D. F., and Z. Huaman. 1996. A synopsis of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) in the Americas. Taxon 45:3-38.
3. Beerli, P., and J. Felsenstein. 1999. Maximum likelihood estimation of migration rates and effective population numbers in two populations using a coalescent approach. Genetics 152:763-773.
4. Berger, J. O., B. Liseo, and R. L. Wolpert. 1999. Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Stat. Sci. 14:1-28.
5. Bollback, J. P. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1171-1180.
6. Efron, B., E. Halloran, and S. Holmes. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-13434.
7. Felsenstein, J. 1968. Statistical Inference and the Estimation of Phylogenies. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Chicago, Chicago.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
9. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. 1995. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York.
10. Geyer, C. J. 1991. Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. Pages 156-163 in Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface (E. M. Keramidas, ed.). Interface Foundation, Fairfax Station, Virginia.
11. Geyer, C. J. 1992. Practical Markov chain Monte Carlo. Stat. Sci. 7:473-511.
12. Geyer, C. J. 1999. Likelihood inference for spatial point processes. Pages 79-140 in Stochastic Geometry: Likelihood and Computation (O. E. Barndorff-Nielsen, W. S. Kendall, and M. N. M. van Lieshout, eds.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, London.
13. Gilks, W., S. Richardson, and D. Spiegelhalter. 1996. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman and Hall, New York.
14. Goldman, N. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees with special reference to a Poisson process model of DNA substitution and to parsimony analyses. Syst. Zool. 39:345-361.
15. Green, P.J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-732.
16. Hastings, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995a. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
18. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 1995b. The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: Four taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:843-849.
19. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2001. A Bayesian perspective on the Strepsiptera problem. Tijdschr. Entomol. 144:165-178.
20. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states. Syst. Biol. 50:351-366.
21. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and D. M. Hillis. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
22. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and N. S. Imennov. 2002. Geographic origin of human mitochondrial DNA: Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty and model comparison. Syst. Biol. 51:155-165.
23. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, and D. L. Swofford. 2000a. A compound poisson process for relaxing the molecular clock. Genetics 154:1879-1892.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000b. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution 54:353-364.
25. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and J. P. Masly. 2000c. Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288:2349-2350.
26. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
27. Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
28. Jeffreys, H. 1961. Theory of Probability. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
29. Kuhner, M. K., and J. Felsenstein. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:459-468.
30. Kuhner, M., J. Yamato, and J. Felsenstein. 1994. Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics 149:429-434.
31. Larget, B., and D. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
32. Larget, B., D. Simon, and J. B. Kadane. 2002. Bayesian phylogenetic inference from animal mitochondrial genome arrangements. Stat. Soc. B 64:1-13.
33. Lavine, M., and M. J. Schervisch. 1999. Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not. Am. Stat. 53:119-122.
34. Li, S. 1996. Phylogenetic Tree Construction Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Ph.D. Dissertation, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
35. Losos, J. B., and D. B. Miles. 1994. Adaptation, constraint, and the comparative method: Phylogenetic issues and methods. Pages 60-98 in Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology (P.C. Wainwright and S. Reilly, eds.). Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Maddison, D. R., and W. P. Maddison. 2000. Mac-Clade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. Manos, P. S., R. E. Miller, and P. Wilkin. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of Ipomoea, Argyreia, Stictocardia, and Turbina suggests a generalized model of morphological evolution in morning glories. Syst. Bot. 26:585-602.
38. Mau, B. 1996. Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference via Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison.
39. Mau, B., and M. Newton. 1997. Phylogenetic inference for binary data on dendrograms using Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 6:122-131.
40. Mau, B., M. Newton, and B. Larget. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1-12.
41. McDonald, J. A. 1991. Orgin and diversity of Mexican Convolvulaceae. An. Inst. Biol. Univ. Nac. Auton. Mex. Ser. Bot. 62:65-82.
42. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1091.
43. Miller, R. E., T. R. Buckley, and P. S. Manos. 2002. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Syst. Biol. 51:740-753.
44. Miller, R. E., M. D. Rausher, and P. S. Manos. 1999. Phylogenetic systematics of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) based on ITS and waxy sequences. Syst. Bot. 24:209-227.
45. Nielsen, R. 2002. Mapping mutations on phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 51:729-739.
46. Nielsen, R., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2002. Detecting positively selected amino acid sites using posterior predictive P-values. Pages 576-588 in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Proceedings (R. B. Altman, A. K. Dunker, L. Hunter, K. Lauderdale, and T. E. Klein, eds.). World Scientific, Singapore.
47. Nielsen, R., and Z. Yang. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936.
48. Newton, M., B. Mau, and B. Larget. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo for the Bayesian analysis of evolutionary trees from aligned molecular sequences. Pages 143-162 in Statistics in Molecular Biology, Vol. 33 (F. Seillier-Moseiwitch, T. P. Speed, and M. Waterman, eds.). Institute of Mathematical Statistics.
49. Rannala, B. 2002. Identifiability of parameters in MCMC Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:754-760.
50. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
51. Sanderson, M. J., and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies, with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 49:671-685.
52. Simon, D., and B. Larget. 1998. Bayesian Analysis in Molecular Biology and Evolution (BAMBE), Version 1.01 Beta. Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Duquesne Univ. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
53. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, K. S. Dorman, and J. S. Sinsheimer. 2002. Oh brother, where art thou? A Bayes factor test for recombination with uncertain heritage. Syst. Biol. 51:715-728.
54. Thorne, J. L., and H. Kishino. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51:689-702.
55. Thorne, J., H. Kishino, and I. S. Painter. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1647-1657.
56. Tierney, L. 1994. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion). Ann. Stat. 22:1701-1762.
57. Van Ooststroom, S. J. 1953. Convolvulaceae. Pages 458-489 in Flora Malesiana (C. G. G. J. van Steenis, ed.). Woltors-Nordhoff, Groningen, The Netherlands.
58. Verdcourt, B. 1963. Convolvulaceae. Pages 1-161 in Flora of Tropical East Africa (C. E. Hubbard and E. Milne-Redhead, eds.). Whitefriars Press, London.
59. Wheeler, W. C. 1991. Congruence among data sets: A Bayesian approach. Pages 334-346 in Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences (M. M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
60. Wilkin, P. 1999. A morphological cladistic analysis of the Ipomoeeae (Convolvulaceae). Kew Bull. 54:853-876.
61. Yang, Z., N. Goldman, and A. E. Friday. 1995a. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: A peculiar statistical estimation problem. Syst. Biol. 44:384-399.
62. Yang, Z., S. Kumar, and M. Nei. 1995b. A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics 141:1641-1650.
63. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.