Effect of nonindependent substitution on phylogenetic accuracy

Systematic Biology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 317-328

  Huelsenbeck, John P ^a   Nielsen, Rasmus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Compound Poisson process; Nonindependent substitution; Phylogenetic accuracy

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0033139150     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351599260319     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. CHARLESTON, M. A., M. D. HENDY, AND D. PENNY. 1994. The effects of sequence length, tree topology, and number of taxa on the performance of phylogenetic methods. J. Comput. Biol. 1:133-151.
2. DIXON, M. T., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Ribosomal RNA secondary structure: Compensatory mutations and implications for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:256-267.
3. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
4. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
5. FELSENSTEIN, J., AND G. A. CHURCHILL. 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:93-104.
6. FITCH, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-116.
7. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1986. Variability of evolutionary rates of DNA. Genetics 113:1077-1091.
8. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1987. Molecular evolution and the neutral theory. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 4:10-37.
9. GILLESPIE, J. H. 1991. "The causes of molecular evolution." Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
10. GOLDMAN, N., AND Z. YANG. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:725-736.
11. HARVEY, P. H., AND M. D. PAGEL. 1991. "The comparative method in evolutionary biology". Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
12. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
13. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1995. The performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44:17-48.
14. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
15. JIN, L., AND M. NEI. 1990. Limitations of the evolutionary parsimony method of phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 7:82-102.
16. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
17. KAPLAN, N. L., R. R. HUDSON, AND C. H. LANGLEY. 1989. The "hitch-hiking" effect revisited. Genetics 123:887-899.
18. KIDD, K. K., AND L. A. SGARAMELLA-ZONTA. 1971. Phylogenetic analysis: Concepts and methods. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 23:235-252.
19. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
20. MADDISON, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Syst. Zool. 40:304-314.
21. MUSE, S. V. 1995. Evolutionary analyses when nucleotides do not evolve independently. Pages 115-124 in Current topics on molecular evolution (M. Nei and N. Takahata, eds.). Institute on Molecular Evolution and Genetics, University Park, Pennsylvania.
22. MUSE, S. V., AND B. S. GAUT. 1994. A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates with application to the chloroplast genome. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:715-724.
23. NEI, M. 1991. Relative efficiencies of different treemaking methods for molecular data. Pages 90-128 in Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequences (M. Miyamoto and J. Cracraft, eds.).Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
24. NIELSEN, R. 1997. The robustness of the estimator of the index of dispersion for DNA sequences. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 7:346-351.
25. OHTA, T. 1995. Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in mammalian genes and the nearly neutral theory. J. Mol. Evol. 40:56-63.
26. PAGEL, M. D., AND P. H. HARVEY. 1989. Comparative methods for examining adaptation depend on evolutionary methods. Folia Primatol. 53:203-220.
27. RIDLEY, M. 1983. The exploration of organic diversity: The comparative method and adaptations for mating. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, England.
28. Ross, S. M. 1996. Stochastic processes, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
29. RZHETSKY, A. 1995. Estimating substitution rates in ribosomal RNA genes. Genetics 141:771-783.
30. SCHÖNIGER, M., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1994. A stochastic model and the evolution of autocorrelated DNA sequences. Mol. Phyl. Evol. 3:240-247.
31. SCHÖNIGER, M., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1995. Performance of the maximum likelihood, neighbor joining, and maximum parsimony methods when sequence sites are not independent. Syst. Biol. 44:533-547.
32. SOKAL, R. R., AND C. D. MICHENER. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 28:1409-1438.
33. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular Systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
34. TATENO, Y., N. TAKEZAKI, AND M. NEI. 1994. Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. MoL. Biol. Evol. 11:261-277.
35. TILLIER, E. R. M., AND R. A. COLLINS. 1995. Neighbor joining and maximum likelihood with RNA sequences: Addressing the interdependence of sites. MoL. Biol. Evol. 12:7-15.
36. WHEELER, W. C., AND R. L. HONEYCUTT. 1988. Paired sequence difference in ribosomal RNAs: Evolutionary and phylogenetic implication. MoL. Biol. Evol. 5:90-96.
37. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
38. YANG, Z. 1995. A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences. Genetics 139:993-1005.