Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 248-254

  Douady, Christophe J ^a   Delsuc, Frédéric ^b   Boucher, Yan ^a   Doolittle, W Ford ^a   Douzery, Emmanuel J P ^b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Bootstrap; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Maximum likelihood; Phylogeny; Posterior probability

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; GENOME; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; RELIABILITY;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0037329108     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msg042     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arkhipova, I. R., and H. G. Morrison. 2001. Three retrotransposon families in the genome of Giardia lamblia: two telomeric, one dead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14497-502.
2. Boucher, Y., H. Huber, S. L'haridon, K. O. Stetter, and W. F. Doolittle. 2001. Bacterial origin for the isoprenoid biosynthesis enzyme HMG-CoA reductase of the archaeal orders Thermoplasmatales and Archaeoglobales. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1378-88.
3. Buckley, T. R. 2002. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst. Biol. 51:509-523.
4. Buckley, T. R., P. Arensburger, C. Simon, and G. K. Chambers. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18.
5. Buckley, T. R., and C. W. Cunningham. 2002. The effect of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:394-405.
6. Delsuc, F., M. Scally, O. Madsen, M. J. Stanhope, W. W. De Jong, F. M. Catzeflis, M. S. Springer, and E. J. P. Douzery. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of living xenarthrans and the impact of character and taxon sampling on the placental tree rooting. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1656-1671.
7. Douady, C. J., M. Dosay, M. S. Shivji, and M. J. Stanhope. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (rays and skates) as derived sharks. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. (in press).
8. Douzery, E. J., A. M. Pridgeon, P. Kores, H. P. Linder, H. Kurzweil, and M. W. Chase. 1999. Molecular phylogenetics of Diseae (Orchidaceae): a contribution from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Am. J. Bot. 86:887-899.
9. Efron, B., E. Halloran, and S. Holmes. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-13434.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
11. -. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
12. -. 2001. PHYLIP (PHYLogeny Inference Package). Version 3.6a2.1. Department of Genome Sciences. University of Washington. Seattle.
13. Felsenstein, J., and H. Kishino. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies - a reply. Syst. Biol. 42:193-200.
14. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
15. Henze, K., D. S. Homer, S. Suguri, D. V. Moore, L. B. Sanchez, M. Muller, and T. M. Embley. 2001. Unique phylogenetic relationships of glucokinase and glucosephosphate isomerase of the amitochondriate eukaryotes Giardia intestinalis, Spironucleus barkhanus, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Gene 281:123-131.
16. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical-test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2002. Testing a covariotide model of DNA substitution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:698-707.
18. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688.
19. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
20. Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
21. Karol, K. G., R. M. Mccourt, M. T. Cimino, and C. F. Delwiche. 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science 294:2351-2353.
22. Kimura, M. 1980. A simple method for estimation evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 16:111-120.
23. Larget, B., and D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
24. Leaché, A. D., and T. W. Reeder. 2002. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51:44-68.
25. Lutzoni,F.,M. Pagel, and V. Reeb. 2001. Major fungal lineages are derived from lichen symbiotic ancestors. Nature 411:937-940.
26. Maddison, W. P. 1997. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46:523-536.
27. Meireles, C. M., J. Czelusniak, M. P. Schneider, J. A. Muniz, M. C. Brigido, H. S. Ferreira, and M. Goodman. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of ateline New World monkeys (Platyrrhini, Atelinae) based on gamma-globin gene sequences: evidence that Brachyteles is the sister group of Lagothrix. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12:10-30.
28. Murphy, W. J., E. Eizirik, S. J. O'Brien et al. (11 co-authors). 2001. Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics. Science 294:2348-2352.
29. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-81.8
30. Rambaut, A., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:235-238.
31. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
32. Strimmer, K., and A. von Haeseler. 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood mehtod for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:964-969.
33. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
34. Waddell, P. J., H. Kishino, and R. Ota. 2001. A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics. Genome Informatics Series. 12:141-155.
35. Whittingham, L. A., B. Slikas, D. W. Winkler, and F. H. Sheldon. 2002. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:430-441.
36. Wilcox, T. P., D. J. Zwickl, T. A. Heath, and D. M. Hillis. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:361-371.
37. Yang, Z., and B. Rannala. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.