Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1114-1116

  Shimodaira, Hidetoshi ^a   Hasegawa, Masami ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Confidence limit of tree topology; Kishino Hasegawa test; Mammalian phylogeny; Multiple comparisons; Multiplicity of testings; Selection bias

Indexed keywords

GENETIC SELECTION; LETTER; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MOLECULAR MODEL; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICS;

EID: 0032766857     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026201     Document Type: Letter

References (18)

1. ADACHI, J., and M. HASEGAWA. 1996. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:459-468.
2. COX, D. R. 1962. Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 24:406-424.
3. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
4. _. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
5. GRAUR, D., L. DURET, and M. GOUY. 1996. Phylogenetic position of the order Lagomorpha (rabbits, hares and allies). Nature 379:333-335.
6. HALANYCH, K. 1996. Testing hypotheses of chaetognath origins: long branches revealed by 18S ribosomal DNA. Syst. Biol. 45:223-246.
7. HASEGAWA, M., and J. ADACHI. 1996. Phylogenetic position of cetaceans relative to artiodactyls: reanalysis of mitochondrial and nuclear sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:710-717.
8. KISHINO, H., and M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
9. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, and M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 30:151-160.
10. LINHART, H. 1988. A test whether two AIC's differ significantly. S. Afr. Stat. J. 22:153-161.
11. NOVACEK, M. 1992. Mammalian phylogeny: shaking the tree. Nature 356:121-125.
12. SHIMODAIRA, H. 1993. A model search technique based on confidence set and map of models. Proc. Inst. Stat. Math. 41:131-147 [in Japanese].
13. _. 1997. Assessing the error probability of the model selection test. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 49:395-410.
14. _. 1998. An application of multiple comparison techniques to model selection. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 50:1-13.
15. VUONG, Q. H. 1989. Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57:307-333.
16. WADDELL, P., Y. CAO, J. HAUF, and M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including AA invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the position of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant. Syst. Biol. 48:31-53.
17. YANG, Z. 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.
18. _. 1997. PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 13:555-556.