Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 652-670

  Goldman, Nick ^a   Anderson, Jon P ^b   Rodrigo, Allen G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Kishino Hasegawa test; Maximum likelihood; Phylogeny; Shimodaira Hasegawa test; Statistical tests; Tree topology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CLASSIFICATION; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHYLOGENY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0034351387     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351500750049752     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ADACHI, J., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1996, MOLPHY: Programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood, vers. 2.3. Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo.
2. ARVESTAD, L., AND W. J. BRUNO. 1997. Estimation of reversible substitution matrices from multiple pairs of sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 45:696-703.
3. BAR-HEN, A., AND H. KISHINO. In press. Comparing the likelihood functions of phylogenetic trees. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math.
4. CUNNINGHAM, C. W., H. ZHU, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1998. Best-fit maximum-likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: empirical tests with known phylogenies. Evolution 52:978-987.
5. EFRON, B. 1982. The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. CBMS-NSF regional conference series in applied mathematics, volume 38. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
6. EFRON, B., AND R. TIBSHIRANI. 1986. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat. Sci. 1:54-77.
7. EFRON, B., E. HALLORAN, AND S. HOLMES. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13429-13434.
8. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
9. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
10. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1995. PHYLIP (Phylogenetic inference package), version 3.57. Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
11. GOLDMAN, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 36:182-198.
12. GOLDMAN, N., AND S. WHELAN. 2000. Statistical tests of gamma-distributed rate heterogeneity in models of sequence evolution in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:975-978.
13. HALL, P., AND S. R. WILSON. 1991. Two guidelines for bootstrap hypothesis testing. Biometrics 47:757-762.
14. HASEGAWA, M., AND H. KISHINO. 1989. Confidence limits on the maximum-likelihood estimate of the hominoid tree from mitochondrial-DNA sequences. Evolution 43:672-677.
15. HASEGAWA, M., AND H. KISHINO. 1994. Accuracies of the simple methods for estimating the bootstrap probability of a maximum-likelihood tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:142-145.
16. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
17. HASEGAWA, M., H. KISHINO, AND T. YANO. 1988. Phylogenetic inference from DNA sequence data. Pages 1-13 in Statistical theory and data analysis II (K. Mutusita, ed.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
18. HILLIS, D. M., B. K. MABLE, AND C. MORITZ. 1996. Applications of molecular systematics: the state of the field and a look to the future. Pages 515-543 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. HOPE, A. C. A. 1968. A simplified Monte Carlo significance test procedure. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 30:582-598.
20. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:437-466.
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: Testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227-232.
22. HUELSENBECK, J. P., D. M. HILLIS, AND R. NIELSEN. 1996. A likelihood-ratio test of monophyly. Syst. Biol. 45:546-558.
23. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
24. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
25. KISHINO, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
26. KISHINO, H., T. MIYATA, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny and the origin of chloroplasts. J. Mol. Evol. 31:151-160.
27. MARRIOTT, F. H. C. 1979. Barnard's Monte Carlo tests: how many simulations? Appl. Statist. 28:75-77.
28. RODRIGO, A. G., M. KELLY-BORGES, P. R. BERGQUIST, AND P. L. BERGQUIST. 1993. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. N.Z. J. Bot. 31:257-268.
29. SHIMODAIRA, H. 1993. A model search technique based on confidence set and map of models. Proc. Inst. Stat. Math. 41:131-147 (in Japanese).
30. SHIMODAIRA, H. 1998. An application of multiple comparison techniques to model selection. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 50:1-13.
31. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
32. STRIMMER, K., AND A. VON HAESELER. 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:964-969.
33. STRIMMER, K., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. VON HAESELER. 1997. Bayesian probabilities and quartet puzzling. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:210-211.
34. SULLIVAN, J., K. E. HOLSINGER, AND C. SIMON. 1996. The effect of topology on estimates of among-site rate variation. J. Mol. Evol. 42:308-312.
35. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1998. PAUP* 4.00: *Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
36. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D.M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
37. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37:221-244.
38. WESTFALL, P. H., AND S. S. YOUNG. 1993. Resampling-based multiple testing: Examples and methods for p-value adjustment. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
39. YANG, Z. 1994. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
40. YANG, Z. 1996. Among-site variation and its impact on phylogenetic analysis. TREE 11:367-372.
41. YANG, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 13:555-556.
42. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.
43. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1995. Maximum likelihood trees from DNA sequences: a peculiar statistical estimation problem. Syst. Biol. 44:384-399.
44. YANG, Z., R. NIELSEN, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1998. Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1600-1611.
45. ZHANG, J. 1999. Performance of likelihood ratio tests of evolutionary hypotheses under inadequate substitution models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:868-875.