Mitochondrial genomes suggest that hexapods and crustaceans are mutually paraphyletic

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 272, Issue 1569, 2005, Pages 1295-1304

  Cook, Charles E ^a,c   Yue, Qiaoyun ^b,d   Akam, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^c BRITISH ANTARCTIC SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthropoda; Genome; Hexapoda; Mitochondria; Pancrustacea; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEAN; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGENY;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRUSTACEA; GENE SEQUENCE; HEXAPODA; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MITOCHONDRIAL GENETICS; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NEIGHBOR JOINING METHOD; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PARAPHYLY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENE ORDER; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTHROPODA; BRANCHIOPODA; CHELICERATA; COLLEMBOLA; CRUSTACEA; HEXAPODA; INSECTA; MALACOSTRACA; MAXILLOPODA; MYRIAPODA; ONYCHIURIDAE; ONYCHIURUS; PANCRUSTACEA; PARHYALE; PODURA AQUATICA; SQUILLA MANTIS; THERMOBIA DOMESTICA; TRIOPS LONGICAUDATUS;

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPODS; BASE COMPOSITION; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENE ORDER; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 24044511196     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.3042     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Arnason, U. et al. 2002 Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 8151-8156.
2. Bitsch, C. & Bitsch, J. 2004 Phylogenetic relationships of basal hexapods among the mandibulate arthropods: a cladistic analysis based on comparative morphological characters. Zool. Scr. 33, 511-550.
3. Boore, J. L., Collins, T. M., Stanton, D., Daehler, L. L. & Brown, W. M. 1995 Deducing the pattern of arthropod phylogeny from mitochondrial DNA rearrangements. Nature 316, 163-165.
4. Boore, J. L., Lavrov, D. V. & Brown, W. M. 1998 Gene translocation links insects and crustaceans. Nature 392, 667-668.
5. Brusca, R. C. & Brusca, G. J. 2003 Invertebrates. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
6. Castresana, J. 2000 Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 540-552.
7. Chenna, R., Sugawara, H., Koike, T., Lopez, R., Gibson, T. J., Higgins, D. G. & Thompson, J. D. 2003 Multiple sequence alignment with the CLUSTAL series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3497-3500.
8. Collins, K. P. & Wiegmann, B. M. 2002a Phylogenetic relationships and placement of the Empidoidea (Diptera: Brachycera) based on 28S rDNA and EF-1alpha sequences. Insect Syst. Evol. 33, 421-444.
9. Collins, K. P. & Wiegmann, B. M. 2002b Phylogenetic relationships of the lower Cyclorrhapha (Diptera: Brachycera) based on 28S rDNA sequences. Insect Syst. Evol. 33, 445-456.
10. Cook, C. E., Smith, M. L., Telford, M. J., Bastianello, A. & Akam, M. 2001 Hox genes and the phylogeny of the arthropods. Curr. Biol. 11, 759-763.
11. Crozier, R. H. & Crozier, Y. C. 1993 The mitochondrial genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera: complete sequence and genome organization. Genetics 133, 97.
12. Delsuc, R, Phillips, M. & Penny, D. 2003 Comment on 'hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic'. Science 301, 1482d.
13. Deutsch, J. 2001 Are Hexapoda members of the Crustacea? Evidence from comparative developmental genetics. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 37, 41-49.
14. Dohle, W. 2001 Are the insects terrestrial crustaceans? A discussion of some new facts and arguments and the proposal of the proper name 'tetraconata' for the monophyletic unit Crustacea+ Hexapoda. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 37, 85-104.
15. Felsenstein, J. 2004 Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
16. Friedrich, M. & Tautz, D. 1995 Ribosomal DNA phylogeny of the major extant arthropod classes and the evolution of myriapods. Nature 376, 165-167.
17. García-Machado, E., Pempera, M., Dennebouy, N., Oliva-Saurez, M., Mounolou, J.-C. & Monnerot, M. 1999 Mitochondrial genes collectively suggest the paraphyly of Crustacea with respect to Insecta. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 142-149.
18. Gerberding, M., Browne, W. E. & Patel, N. H. 2002 Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates. Development 129, 5789-5801.
19. Goldman, N., Anderson, J. P. & Rodrigo, A. G. 2000 Likelihood-based test of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49, 652-670.
20. Hansen, H. J. 1893 A contribution to the morphology of the limbs and mouthparts of crustaceans and insects. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 67, 417-434.
21. Harrison, G. L. A., McLenachan, P. A., Phillips, M. J., Slack, K. E., Cooper, A. & Penny, D. 2004 Four new avian mitochondrial genomes help get to basic evolutionary questions in the late Cretaceous. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 974-983.
22. Hassanin, A., Léger, N. & Deutsch, J. 2005 Evidence for multiple reversals of asymmetric mutational constraints during the evolution of the mitochondrial genome of Metazoa, and consequences for phylogenetic inferences. Syst. Biol. 54, 277-298.
23. Hessler, R. R. 1992 Reflections on the phylogenetic position of the Cephalocarida. Acta Zool. 73, 315-316.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. 2001 MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754-755.
25. Hwang, U. W., Park, C. J., Yong, T. S. & Kim, W. 2001 One-step PCR amplification of complete arthropod mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 19, 345-352.
26. Koch, M. 2001 Mandibular mechanisms and the evolution of hexapods. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 37, 129-174.
27. Kraus, O. 2001 'Myriapoda' and the ancestry of the Hexapoda. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France 37, 105-128.
28. Lavrov, D. V., Boore, J. L. & Brown, W. M. 2002 Complete mtDNA sequences of two millipedes suggest a new model for mitochondrial gene rearrangements: duplication and nonrandom loss. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 163-169.
29. Lavrov, D. V., Brown, W. M. & Boore, J. L. 2004 Phylogenetic position of the Pentastomida and (pan) crustacean relationships. Proc. R. Soc. B 271, 537-544.
30. Lockhart, P. J., Steel, M. A., Hendy, M. D. & Penny, D. 1994 Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 605-612.
31. Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. 1997 tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955-964.
32. Mallatt, J. M., Garey, J. R. & Shultz, J. W. 2004 Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31, 178-191.
33. Martin, J. W. & Davis, G. E. 2001 An updated classification of the recent Crustacea. Science Series No. 39. Los Angeles, CA: Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County.
34. Nardi, F., Carapelli, A., Fanciulli, P. P., Dallai, R. & Frati, F. 2001 The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the basal hexapod Tetrodontophora bielanensis: evidence for heteroplasmy and tRNA translocations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1293-1304.
35. Nardi, F., Spinsanti, G., Boore, J. L., Carapelli, A., Dallai, R. & Frati, F. 2003a Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic? Science 299, 1887-1889.
36. Nardi, F., Spinsanti, G., Boore, J. L., Carapelli, A., Dallai, R. & Frati, F. 2003b Response to comment on 'Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic'. Science 301, 1482e.
37. Negrisolo, E., Minelli, A. & Valle, G. 2004 The mitochondrial genome of the house centipede Scutigera and the monophyly versus paraphyly of myriapods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 770-780.
38. Phillips, M. J. & Penny, D. 2003 The root of the mammalian tree inferred from whole mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28, 171-185.
39. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. 1998 MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818.
40. Shao, R. & Barker, S. C. 2003 The highly rearranged mitochondrial genome of the plague thrips, Thrips imaginis (Insecta: Thysanoptera): convergence of two novel gene boundaries and an extraordinary arrangement of rRNA genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 362-370.
41. Shao, R., Campbell, N. J. & Barker, S. C. 2001 Numerous gene rearrangements in the mitochondrial genome of the wallaby louse, Heterodoxus macropus (Phthiraptera). Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 858-865.
42. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. 1999 Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 1114-1116.
43. Simmons, M. P., Pickett, K. M. & Miya, M. 2004 How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 188-199.
44. Strimmer, K. & von Haeseler, A. 1996 Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree toplogies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 964-969.
45. Strimmer, K. & von Haeseler, A. 1997 Likelihood-mapping: a simple method to visualize phylogenetic content. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 6815-6819.
46. Swofford, D. L. 1998 PAUP* phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
47. Telford, M. J., Lockyer, A. E., Cartwright-Finch, C. & Littlewood, D. T. J. 2003 Combined large and small subunit ribosomal RNA phylogenies support a basal position of the acoelomorph flatworms. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 1077-1083. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2342.)
48. Tillyard, R. J. 1930 The evolution of the class Insecta. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tas. 1-89.
49. Whelan, S. & Goldman, N. 2001 A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 691-699.
50. Wilson, K., Cahill, V., Ballment, E. & Benzie, J. 2000 The complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of the crustacean Penaeus monodon: are malacostracan crustaceans more closely related to insects than to branchiopods? Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 863-874.