Choosing the best genes for the job: The case for stationary genes in genome-scale phylogenetics

Systematic Biology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 493-500

  Collins, Timothy M ^a   Fedrigo, Olivier ^b   Naylor, Gavin J P ^c  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; CODON; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

CLASSIFICATION; CODON; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENES; GENOME; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION BIAS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 22844439075     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150590947339     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Baker, R. H., and R. DeSalle. 1997. Multiple sources of character information and the phylogeny of Hawaiian drosophilids. Syst. Biol. 46:654-673.
2. Foster, P. G. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53: 485-495.
3. Gee, H. 2003. Ending incongruence. Nature 425:782.
4. Phillips, M. J., F. Delsuc, and D. Penny. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1455-1458.
5. Rokas, A., B. L. Williams, N. King, and S. B. Carroll. 2003. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
6. Saccone, C., G. Pesole, and G. Preparata. 1989. DNA microenvironments and the molecular clock. J. Mol. Evol. 29:407-411.
7. Steel, M., and D. Penny. 2000. Parsimony, likelihood, and the role of models in molecular phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:839-850.
8. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP* Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
9. Swofford, D. L., P. J. Waddell, J. P. Huelsenbeck, P. G. Foster, P. O. Lewis, and J. S. Rogers. 2001. Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst. Biol. 50:525-539.
10. Taylor, D. J., and Piel, W. H. 2004. An assessment of accuracy, error, and conflict with support values from genome-scale phylogenetic data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1534-1537.