Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data

Systematic Biology

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-67

  Nylander, Johan A A ^a   Ronquist, Fredrik ^a   Huelsenbeck, John P ^b   Nieves Aldrey, José Luis ^c  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b University of California San Diego   (United States)

^c MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayes factors; Bayesian analysis; Combined data; Cynipidae; Gall wasps; MCMC; Model heterogeneity; Model selection

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; WASP;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; RESEARCH DESIGN; WASPS;

ANIMALIA; CYNIPIDAE; VESPIDAE;

EID: 1642341403     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150490264699     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aitkin, M. 1991. Posterior Bayes factors. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 53:111-142.
2. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in Second International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds.). Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
3. Aris-Brosou, S., and Z. Yang. 2002. Effects of models of rate evolution on estimation of divergence dates with special reference to the metazoan 18S ribosomal RNA phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:703-714.
4. Askew, R. R. 1984.The biology of gallwasps. Pages 223-271 in Biology of gall insects (T. N. Anantakrishnan, ed.). Edward Arnold, London.
5. Barker, F. K., and F. M. Lutzoni. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst. Biol. 51:625-637.
6. Bartlett, M. S. 1957. A comment on D. V. Lindley's statistical paradox. Biometrika 44:187-192.
7. Bollback, J. P. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1171-1180.
8. Buckley, T. R., P. Arensburger, C. Simon, and G. K. Chambers. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18.
9. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference, a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edition. Springer, New York.
10. Cunningham, C. W. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:733-740.
11. DeBry, R. W. 1999. Maximum likelihood analysis of gene-based and structure-based process partitions, using mammalian mitochondrial genomes. Syst. Biol. 48:286-299.
12. de Queiroz, A., M. J. Donoghue, and J. Kim. 1995. Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26:657-681.
13. Dowton, M., and A. D. Austin. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy - The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51:19-31.
14. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
15. Gamerman, D. 1997. Markov chain Monte Carlo: Stochastic simulation for Bayesian inference. Chapman and Hall, London.
16. Gelfand, A. E., and D. K. Dey. 1994. Bayesian model choice: Asymptotics and exact calculations. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 56:501-514.
17. Geyer, C. J. 1991. Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. Pages 156-163 in Computing science and statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface (E. M. Keramidas, ed.). Interface Foundation, Fairfax Station.
18. Goloboff, P. A. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9:83-91.
19. Gu, X., Y.-X. Fu, and W.-H. Li. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:546-557.
20. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 21:160-174.
21. Hastings, W. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
22. Holder, M., and P. O. Lewis. 2003. Phylogeny estimation: Traditional and Bayesian approaches. Nat. Genet. 4:275-284.
23. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. J. Bull. 1996. A likelihood-ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
24. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and K. A. Crandall. 1997. Phylogeny estimation and hypothesis testing using maximum likelihood. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:437-466.
25. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688.
26. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17:754-755.
27. Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen, and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
28. Jeffreys, H. 1961. Theory of probability, 3rd edition. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
29. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. M. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
30. Kass, R. E., and A. E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-795.
31. Kinsey, A. C. 1920. Phylogeny of cynipid genera and biological characteristics. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 42:357-402.
32. Lanave, C., G. Preparata, C. Saccone, and G. Serio. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol. 20: 86-93.
33. Larget, B., and D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
34. Lavine, M., and M. J. Schervish. 1999. Bayes factors: What they are and what they are not. Am. Stat. 53:119-122.
35. Lewis, P. O. 2001a. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
36. Lewis, P. O. 2001b. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:30-37.
37. Liljeblad, J., and F. Ronquist. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of higher-level gall wasp relationships (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Syst. Entomol. 23:229-252.
38. Lindley, D. V. 1957. A statistical paradox. Biometrika 44:187-192.
39. Metropolis, N., A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller 1953. Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
40. Newton, M. A., and A. E. Raftery. 1994. Approximate Bayesian inference by the weighted likelihood bootstrap (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met. 56:3-48.
41. Nieves-Aldrey, J. L. 2001. Hymenoptera, Cynipidae. Pages 1-636 in Fauna Ibérica, Volume 16 (M. A. Ramos, ed.). Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid.
42. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 2001. Selecting the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50:580-601.
43. Pupko, T., D. Huchon, Y. Cao, N. Okada, and M. Hasegawa. 2002. Combining multiple data sets in a likelihood analysis: Which models are the best? Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:2294-2307.
44. Rodríguez, J., L. Oliver, A. Marín, and R. Medina. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J. Theor. Biol. 142:485-501.
45. Rokas, A., J. A. A. Nylander, F. Ronquist, and G. N. Stone. 2002. A maximum-likelihood analysis of eight phylogenetic markers in gallwasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae): Implications for insect phylogenetic studies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:206-219.
46. Ronquist, F. 1994. Evolution of parasitism among closely related species: Phylogenetic relationships and the origin of inquilinism in gall wasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Evolution 48:241-261.
47. Ronquist, F. 1999. Phylogeny, classification and evolution of the Cynipoidea. Zool. Scr. 28:139-164.
48. Ronquist, F., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
49. Ronquist, F., and J. Liljeblad. 2001. Evolution of the gall wasp-host plant association. Evolution 55:2503-2522.
50. Sanderson, M. J., and J. Kim. 2000. Parametric phylogenetics? Syst. Biol. 49:817-829.
51. Schwartz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimensions of a model. Ann. Stat. 6:461-464.
52. Stone, G. N., K. Schönrogge, R. Atkinson, D. Bellido, and J. Pujade-Villar. 2002. The population biology of oak gall wasps (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47:633-668.
53. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, and J. S. Sinsheimer. 2001. Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1001-1013.
54. Sullivan, J., K. E. Holsinger, and C. Simon. 1995. The effect of topology on estimates of among-site rate variation. J. Mol. Evol. 42:308-312.
55. Suzuki, Y., G. V. Glazko, and M. Nei. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16138-16143.
56. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
57. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17:57-86.
58. Thompson, J. D., D. G. Higgins, and T. J. Gibson. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic. Acids. Res. 22:4673-4680.
59. Thorne, J. L., and H. Kishino. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol 51:689-702.
60. Tierney, L. 1994. Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions (with discussion). Ann. Stat. 22:1701-1762.
61. Verdinelli, I., and L. Wasserman. 1995. Computing Bayes factors using a generalization of the Savage-Dickey density ratio. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:614-618.
62. Wakely, J. 1994. Substitution-rate variation among sites and the estimation of transition bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:436-442.
63. Wasserman, L. 2000. Bayesian model selection and model averaging. J. Math. Psychol. 44:92-107.
64. Weidner, H. 1968. Zur kenntnis der Gallwespentribus Aulacini (Hymenoptera, Cynipidae). Entomol. Z. (Frankf. Main) 78:105-120.
65. Yang, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
66. Yang, Z. 1996a. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.
67. Yang, Z. 1996b. Maximum likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596.