Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies

Nature

Volumn 425, Issue 6960, 2003, Pages 798-804

  Rokas, Antonis ^a   Williams, Barry I ^a   King, Nicole ^a   Carroll, Sean B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROBABILITY; TOPOLOGY; YEAST;

MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS;

GENES;

ARTICLE; CANDIDA ALBICANS; EVOLUTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES BAYANUS; SACCHAROMYCES CASTELLII; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KLUYVERI; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; SACCHAROMYCES MIKATAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS; YEAST;

GENES, FUNGAL; GENOME, FUNGAL; GENOMICS; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACCHAROMYCES;

CANDIDA; CANDIDA ALBICANS; NAUMOVIA CASTELLII; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES BAYANUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES KLUYVERI; SACCHAROMYCES KUDRIAVZEVII; SACCHAROMYCES MIKATAE; SACCHAROMYCES PARADOXUS;

EID: 0242365676     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature02053     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Baldauf, S. L., Roger, A. J., Wenk-Siefert, I. & Doolittle, W. F. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 290, 972-977 (2000).
2. Brown, J. R., Douady, C. J., Italia, M. J., Marshall, W. E. & Stanhope, M. J. Universal trees based on large combined protein sequence data sets. Nature Genet. 28, 281-285 (2001).
3. Aguinaido, A. M. A. et al. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods and other moulting animals. Nature 387, 489-493 (1997).
4. Knoll, A. H. & Carroll, S. B. Early animal evolution: emerging views from comparative biology and geology. Science 284, 2129-2137 (1999).
5. Pace, N. R. A molecular view of microbial diversity and the biosphere. Science 276, 734-740 (1997).
6. Kopp, A. & True, J. R. Phylogeny of the Oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group: a multilocus reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 51, 786-805 (2002).
7. Mason-Gamer, R. J. & Kellogg, E. A. Testing for phylogenctic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst. Biol. 45, 522-543 (1996).
8. Giribet, G., Edgecombe, G. D. & Wheeler, W. C. Arthropod phylogeny based on eight molecular loci and morphology. Nature 413, 157-161 (2001).
9. Hwang, U. W., Friedrich, M., Tautz, D., Park, C. J. & Kim, W. Mitochondrial protein phylogeny joins myriapods with chelicerates. Nature 413, 154-157 (2001).
10. Rokas, A., King, N., Finnerty, J. & Carroll, S. B. Conflicting phylogenetic signals at the base of the metazoan tree. Evol. Dev. 5, 346-359 (2003).
11. Loytynoja, A. & Milinkovitch, M. C. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of the mitochondrial ADP-ATP carriers: the Plantae/Fungi/Metazoa trichotomy revisited. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 10202-10207 (2001).
12. Baldauf, S. L. & Palmer, J. D. Animals and fungi are each other's closest relatives: congruent evidence from multiple proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 11558-11562 (1993).
13. Wendel, J. F. & Doyle, J. J. in Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing (eds Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. & Doyle, J. J.) 265-296 (Kluwer, Boston, Massachusetts, 1998).
14. Huelsenbeck, J. P. Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44, 17-48 (1995).
15. Philippe, H., Chenuil, A. & Adoutte, A. Can the cambrian explosion be inferred through molecular phylogeny? Development (Suppl.) 15-25 (1994).
16. Cummings, M. P., Otto, S. P. & Wakeley, J. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 814-822 (1995).
17. Graybeal, A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst. Biol. 47, 9-17 (1998).
18. Yang, Z., Goldman, N. & Friday, A. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11, 316-324 (1994).
19. Martin, A. P. & Burg, T. M. Perils of paralogy: using HSP70 genes for inferring organismal phylogenies. Syst. Biol. 51, 570-587 (2002).
20. Maddison, W. P. Gene trees in species trees. Syst. Biol. 46, 523-536 (1997).
21. Satta, Y., Klein, J. & Takahata, N. DNA archives and our nearest relative: the trichotomy problem revisited. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 14, 259-275 (2000).
22. Rieseberg, L. H., Whitton, J. & Linder, C. R. Molecular marker incongruence in plant hybrid zones and in phylogenetic trees. Acta Bot. Neerland. 45, 243-262 (1996).
23. Huelsenbeck, J. P., Bull, J. J. & Cunningham, C. W. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 152-158 (1996).
24. Bull, J. J., Huelsenbeck, J. P., Cunningham, C. W., Swofford, D. L. & Waddell, P. J. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Bio Biol. 42, 384-397 (1993).
25. Sullivan, J. Combining data with different distributions of among-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 45, 375-380 (1996).
26. Cunningham, C. W. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Mol. Biol. Evol. 14, 733-740 (1997).
27. Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402-404 (1999).
28. Murphy, W. J. et al. Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409, 614-618 (2001).
29. Moreira, D., Le Guyader, H. & Philippe, H. The origin of red algae and the evolution of chloroplasts. Nature 405, 69-72 (2000).
30. Naylor, G. J. P. & Brown, W. M. Amphioxus mitochondrial DNA, chordate phylogeny, and the limits of inference based on comparisons of sequences. Syst. Biol. 47, 61-76 (1998).
31. Hillis, D. M. Inferring complex phylogenies. Nature 383, 130-131 (1996).
32. Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241-254 (2003).
33. Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 274, 546 (1996) 563-567.
34. Cliften, P. et al. Finding functional features in Saccharomyces genomes by phylogenetic footprinting. Science 301, 71-76 (2003).
35. Wolfe, K. H. & Shields, D. C. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708-713 (1997).
36. Wong, S., Butler, G. & Wolfe, K. H. Gene order evolution and paleopolyploidy in hemiascomycete yeasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9272-9277 (2002).
37. Langkjaer, R. B., Cliften, P. F., Johnston, M. & Piskur, J. Yeast genome duplication was followed by asynchronous differentiation of duplicated genes. Nature 421, 848-852 (2003).
38. Hillis, D. M., Moritz, C. & Mable, B. K. (eds) Molecular Systematics (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1996).
39. Bapteste, E. et al. The analysis of 100 genes supports the grouping of three highly divergent amoebae: Dictyostelium, Entamoeba, and Mastigamoeba. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 1414-1419 (2002).
40. Averof, M., Rokas, A., Wolfe, K. H. & Sharp, P. M. Evidence for a high frequency of simultaneous double-nucleotide substitutions. Science 287, 1285-1286 (2000).
41. Sanderson, M. J. & Shaffer, H. B. Troubleshooting molecular phylogenetic analyses. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 49-72 (2002).
42. Kurtzman, C. P. & Robnett, C. J. Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res. 3, 417-432 (2003).
43. Lopez, P., Casane, D. & Philippe, H. Heterotachy, an important process of protein evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 1-7 (2002).
44. Naumov, G. I., James, S. A., Naumowa, E. S., Louis, E. J. & Roberts, I. N. Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kudriavzevii and Saccharomyces mikatae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50, 1931-1942 (2000).
45. Bergthorsson, U., Adams, K. L., Thomason, B. & Palmer, J. D. Widespread horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes in flowering plants. Nature 424, 197-201 (2003).
46. Blair, J. E., Ikeo, K., Gojobori, T. & Hedges, S. B. The evolutionary position of nematodes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2, 7 (2002).
47. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. Clustal-W - improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-4680 (1994).
48. Hall, T. A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98tNT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95-98 (1999).
49. Swofford, D. L. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) (Version 4.0b10) (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 2002).
50. Posada, D. & Crandall, K. A. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14, 817-818 (1998).