Comparing bootstrap and posterior probability values in the four-taxon case

Systematic Biology

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 477-487

  Cummings, Michael P ^a   Handley, Scott A ^b   Myers, Daniel S ^a,c   Reed, David L ^d   Rokas, Antonis ^e   Winka, Katarina ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c POMONA COLLEGE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^f UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling; Maximum likelihood; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042069655     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150390218213     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. ALFARO, M. E., S. ZOLLER, AND F. LUTZONI. 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:255-266.
2. BROOKS, S. P., AND A. GELMAN. 1998. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7:434-455.
3. BUCKLEY, T. R., P. ARENSBURGER, C. SIMON, AND G. K. CHAMBERS. 2002. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera. Syst. Biol. 51:4-18.
4. BUCKLEY, T. R., AND C. W. CUNNINGHAM. 2002. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:394-405.
5. CUMMINGS, M. P., S. P. OTTO, AND J. WAKELEY. 1995. Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:814-822.
6. CUMMINGS, M. P., S. P. OTTO, AND J. WAKELEY. 1999. Genes and other samples of DNA sequence data for phylogenetic inference. Biol. Bull. 196:345-350.
7. DAVID, H. A. 1981. Order statistics, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. DOUADY, C. J., F. DELSUC, Y. BOUCHER, W. F. DOOLITTLE, AND E. J. P. DOUZERY. 2003. Comparison of Bayesian and maximum likelihood bootstrap measures of phylogenetic reliability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:248-254.
9. EFRON, B. 1979. Bootstrapping methods: Another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7:1-26.
10. EFRON, B., E. HALLORAN, AND S. HOLMES. 1996. Bootstrap confidence levels for phylogenetic trees. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7085-7090.
11. EFRON, B., AND R. J. TIBSHIRANI. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New York.
12. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
13. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
14. FELSENSTEIN, J., AND H. KISHINO. 1993. Is there something wrong with the bootstrap on phylogenies? A reply to Hillis and Bull. Syst. Biol. 42:193-200.
15. FISHER, R. A. 1929. Tests of significance in harmonic analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 125:54-59.
16. FUKAMI-KOBAYASHI, K., AND Y. TATENO. 1991. Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 32:79-91.
17. GAUT, B. S., AND P. O. LEWIS. 1995. Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:152-162.
18. GELMAN, A., AND D. B. RUBIN. 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7:457-511.
19. GOOD, P. 1994. Permutation tests, a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. Springer-Verlag, New York.
20. HEDGES, S. B. 1992. The number of replications needed for accurate estimation of the bootstrap P value in phylogenetic studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:366-369.
21. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND D. M. HILLIS. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
22. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
23. HUELSENBECK, J. P., F. RONQUIST, R. NIELSEN, AND J. P. BOLLPACK. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314.
24. IHAKA, R., AND R. GENTLEMAN. 1996. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5:299-314.
25. JUKES, T. H., AND C. R. CANTOR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-132 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
26. KIMURA, M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
27. KUHNER, M. K., AND J. FELSENSTEIN. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:459-468.
28. LARGET, B., AND D. L. SIMON. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
29. LEACHÉ, A. D., AND T. W. REEDER. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): A comparison of parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51:44-68.
30. LEWIS, P. O. 2001. Phylogenetic systematics turns over a new leaf. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:30-37.
31. MANLY, B. F. J. 1991. Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, London.
32. MARITZ, J. S. 1995. Distribution-free statistical methods, 2nd edition. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability 17. Chapman & Hall, London.
33. MAU, B., M. NEWTON, AND B. LARGET. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1-12.
34. MYERS, D. S., AND M. P. CUMMINGS. 2003. Necessity is the mother of invention: A simple grid computing system using commodity tools. J. Parallel Distr. Com. 63:578-589.
35. NEWTON, M., B. MAU, AND B. LARGET. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian analysis of evolutionary trees from aligned molecular sequences. IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series 33:143-162.
36. OTTO, S. P., M. P. CUMMINGS, AND J. WAKELEY. 1996. Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequence data: The effects of sampling. Pages 103-115 in New uses for new phylogenies (P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee, eds.). Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
37. RANNALA, B., AND Z. YANG. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
38. SANDERSON, M. J. 1995. Objections to bootstrapping phylogenies: A critique. Syst. Biol. 44:299-320.
39. SMITH, B. J. 2001. Bayesian output analysis program (BOA), version 1.0.0. Program distributed by author, http://www.public-health.uiowa.edu/boa/.
40. SUZUKI, Y., G. V. GLAZKO, AND M. NEI. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenetics obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16138-16143.
41. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
42. TAVARÉ, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci. 17:57-86.
43. WAKELEY, J. 1993. Substitution rate variation among sites in hypervariable region 1 of human mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 37:613-623.
44. WHITTINGHAM, L. A., B. SLIKAS, D. W. WINKLER, AND F. H. SHELDON. 2002. Phylogeny of the tree swallow genus, Tachycineta (Aves: Hirundinidae), by Bayesian analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22:430-441.
45. WILCOX, T. P., D. J. ZWICKL, T. A. HEATH, AND D. M. HILLIS. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of the dwarf boas and a comparison of Bayesian and bootstrap measures of phylogenetic support. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 25:361-371.
46. YANG, Z. 1993. Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1369-1401.
47. YANG, Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
48. YANG, Z. 1997. PAML: A program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 15:555-556.
49. YANG, Z., N. GOLDMAN, AND A. FRIDAY. 1994. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:316-324.
50. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724.