Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera

Systematic Biology

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 4-18

  Buckley, Thomas R ^a,c   Arensburger, Peter ^b,d   Simon, Chris ^a,b   Chambers, Geoffrey K ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^c LANDCARE RESEARCH   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

AIC; Bayesian statistics; Cicadas; Maximum likelihood; Model selection; Model selection uncertainty; Phylogenetics

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME C OXIDASE; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; ENZYMOLOGY; GENE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HEMIPTERA; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NEW ZEALAND; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ELECTRON TRANSPORT COMPLEX IV; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, INSECT; HEMIPTERA; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; NEW ZEALAND; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VARIATION (GENETICS);

AMPHIPSALTA; ANIMALIA; CICADA; CICADIDAE; HEMIPTERA; INSECTA; KIKIHIA; MAORICICADA; NOTOPSALTA; RHODOPSALTA;

EID: 0036005521     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106351502753475844     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Aguinaldo, A. M., J. M. Turbeville, L. S. Linford, M. C. Rivera, J. R. Garey, R. A. Raff, and J. A. Lake. 1997. Evidence for a clade of nematodes, arthropods, and other moulting animals. Nature 387:489-493.
2. Akaike, H. 1973. Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. Pages 267-281 in Second International Symposium on Information Theory (B. N. Petrov and F. Csaki, eds.). Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.
3. Akaike, H. 1978. A Bayesian analysis of the minimum AIC procedure. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 30:9-14.
4. Akaike, H. 1981. Likelihood of a model and information criteria. J. Economet. 16:3-14.
5. Allison, L., and C. S. Wallace. 1994. The posterior probability distribution of alignments and its application to parameter estimation of evolutionary trees and to optimization of multiple alignments. J. Mol. Evol. 39:418-430.
6. Baker, R. H., G. S. Wilkinson, and R. DeSalle. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50:87-105.
7. Baker, R. H., X. B. Yu, and R. DeSalle. 1998. Assessing the relative contribution of molecular and morphological characters in simultaneous analysis trees. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:427-436.
8. Bollback, J. P., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2001. Phylogeny, genome evolution, and host specificity of single-stranded RNA bacteriophage (family Leviviridae). J. Mol. Evol. 52:117-128.
9. Boon, W. M., C. H. Daugherty, and G. K. Chambers. 2001. The Norfolk Island green parrot and the New Caledonian red-crowned parakeet are distinct species. Emu 101:113-121.
10. Brown, B., J. S. Dugdale, R. M. Emberson, and A. M. Patterson. 2000. Phylogeny of New Zealand hepialid moths (Lepidoptera: Hepialidae) inferred from a cladistic analysis of morphological data. Syst. Entomol. 25:1-14.
11. Brown, B., R. M. Emberson, and A. M. Patterson. 1999. Phylogeny of "Oxycanus" lineages of hepialid moths from New Zealand inferred from sequence variation in the mtDNA COI and II gene regions. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 13:463-473.
12. Buckland, S. T., K. P. Burham, and N. H. Austin. 1997. Model selection - An integral part of inference. Biometrics 53:603-618.
13. Buckley, T. R., and C. W. Cunningham. In press. The effects of nucleotide substitution model assumptions on estimates of nonparametric bootstrap support. Mol. Biol. Evol., in press.
14. Buckley, T. R., C. Simon, and G. K. Chambers. 2001a. Phylogeography of the New Zealand cicada Maoricicada campbelli based on mitochondrial DNA sequences: Ancient clades associated with Cenozoic environmental change. Evolution 55:1395-1407.
15. Buckley, T. R., C. Simon, and G. K. Chambers. 2001b. Exploring among-site rate variation models in a maximum likelihood framework: The effects of model assumptions on estimates of topology, branch lengths and bootstrap support. Syst. Biol. 50:67-86.
16. Buckley, T. R., C. Simon, P. K. Flook, and B. Misof. 2000. Secondary structure and conserved motifs of the frequently sequenced domains IV and V of the insect mitochondrial large subunit rRNA gene. Insect Mol. Biol. 9:565-580.
17. Buckley, T. R., C. Simon, H. Shimodaira, and G. K. Chambers. 2001c. Evaluating hypotheses on the origin and evolution of the New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada) using multiple comparison tests of tree topology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:223-234.
18. Bull, J. J., J. P. Huelsenbeck, C. W. Cunningham, D. L. Swofford, and P. J. Waddel. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-397.
19. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
20. Chambers, G. K, W. M. Boon, T. R. Buckley, and R. A. Hitchmough. 2001. Using molecular methods to understand the Gondwanan affinities of the New Zealand biota: Three case studies. Aust. J. Bot. 49:1-11.
21. Chatfield, C. 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. J. R. Stat. Soc. A 158:419-466.
22. Cooper, A., C. Laiueza-Fox, S. Anderson, A. Rambaut, J. Austin, and R. Ward. 2001. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409:704-707.
23. Cox, D. R. 1962. Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 24:406-424.
24. Crandall, K. A., J. W. Fetzner, Jr., S. H. Lawler, M. Kinnersley, and C. M. Austin. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among the Australian and New Zealand genera of freshwater crayfishes (Decapoda: Parastacidae). Aust. J. Zool. 47:199-214.
25. Crandall, K. A., D. James Harris, and J. W. Fetzner, Jr. 2000. The monophyletic origin of freshwater crayfish estimated from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc. R. Soc. London B 267:1679-1686.
26. DeBry, R. W. 2001. Improving interpretation of the decay index for DNA sequence data. Syst. Biol. 50:742-752.
27. Dolphin, K., R. Belshaw, C. D. L. Orme, and D. L. J. Quicke. 2000. Noise and incongruence: Interpreting results of the incongruence length difference test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:401-406.
28. Dowton, M., and A. D. Austin. 2002. Increased congruence does not necessarily indicate increased phylogenetic accuracy-The behavior of the incongruence length difference test in mixed-model analyses. Syst. Biol. 51:19-30.
29. Dugdale, J. S. 1972. Genera of New Zealand Cicadidae (Homoptera). N. Z. J. Sci. 14:856-882.
30. Dugdale, J. S., and C. A. Fleming. 1969. Two New Zealand cicadas collected on Cook's Endeavour voyage, with descriptions of a new genus. N. Z. J. Sci. 12:929-957.
31. Dugdale, J. S., and C. A. Fleming. 1978. New Zealand cicadas of the genus Maoricicada (Homoptera: Tibicinidae). N. Z. J. Zool. 5:295-340.
32. Excoffier, L., and Z. Yandg. 1999. Substitution rate variation among sites in mitochondrial hypervariable region I of humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1357-1368.
33. Farris, J. S., M. KaÌllersjoÌ, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315-319.
34. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
35. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
36. Fleming, C. A. 1971. A new species of cicada from rock fans in Southern Wellington, with a review of three species with similar songs and habitat. N. Z. J. Sci. 14:443-479.
37. Fleming, C. A. 1975. Acoustic behaviour as a generic character in New Zealand cicadas (Hemiptera: Homoptera). J. R. Soc. N. Z. 5:47-64.
38. Fleming, C. A. 1984. The cicada genus Kikihia Dugdale (Hemiptera: Homoptera). Part I. The New Zealand green foliage cicadas. Rec. Natl. Mus. N. Z. 2:191-206.
39. Forster, M. R. 2000. Key concepts in model selection: Performance and generalizability. J. Math. Psych. 44:205-231.
40. Forster, M. R. 2001. The new science of simplicity. Pages 83-119 in Simplicity, inference and modeling (A. Zellner, H. A. Keuzenkamp, and M. McAleer, eds.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
41. Frati, F., C. Simon, J. Sullivan, and D. L. Swofford. 1997. Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene in collembola. J. Mol. Evol. 44:145-158.
42. Gelman, A., J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. 1995. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC, London.
43. Gleeson, D. M., D. M. Rowell, N. N. Tait, D. A. Briscoe, and A. V. Higgins. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among Onycophora from Australasia inferred from the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10:237-248.
44. Goldman, N., J. P. Anderson, and A. G. Rodrigo. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 49:652-670.
45. Green, P. J. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-732.
46. Gu, X., Y. X. Fu, and W. H. Li. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:546-557.
47. Gustinich, S., G. Manfioletti, G. Del Sal, C. Schneider, and P. Carninci. 1991. A fast method for high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole human blood. BioTechniques 11:298-301.
48. Gutell, R. R., M. W. Gray, and M. N. Schnare. 1993. Compilation of large subunit (23S- & 23S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:3055-3074.
49. Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape split by a molecular clock by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 22:160-174.
50. Herzer, R. H. 1998. Tectonic control of terrestrial species migration to New Zealand in the early to middle Miocene. Geol. Soc. N. Z. Misc. Publ. No. 97, Wellington, N.Z.
51. Herzer, R. H., G. C. H. Chaproniere, A. R. Edwards, C. J. Hollis, B. Pellietier, J. I. Raine, G. H. Scott, V. Stagpoole, C. P. Strong, P. Symonds, G. J. Wilson, and H. Zhu. 1997. Seismic stratigraphy and structural history of the Reinga Basin and its margins, southern Norfolk Ridge system. N. Z. J. Geol. Geophys. 40:57-73.
52. Hickson, R. E., C. Simon, A. Cooper, G. S. Spicer, J. Sullivan, and D. Penny. 1996. Conserved sequence motifs, alignment, and secondary structure for the third domain of animal 12S rRNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:150-169.
53. Higgins, D. G., A. J. Bleasby, and R. Fuchs. 1992. CLUSTAL V: Improved software for multiple sequence alignment. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 8:189-191.
54. Hillis, D. M., and J. J. Bull. 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method of assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:182-192.
55. Hoeting, J. A., D. Madigan, A. E. Raftery, and C. T. Volinsky. 1999. Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14:382-401.
56. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. P. Bollback. 2001. Empirical and hierarchical Bayesian estimation of ancestral states. Syst. Biol. 50:351-366.
57. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and J. J. Bull. 1996. A likelihood ratio test to detect conflicting phylogenetic signal. Syst. Biol. 45:92-98.
58. Huelselbeck, J. P., and N. S. Imennov. 2002. The geographic origin of human mitochondrial DNA: Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty and model comparison. Syst. Biol. 51:155-165.
59. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, and D. Swofford. 2000a. A compound Poisson process of relaxing the molecular clock. Genetics 154:1879-1892.
60. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000b. Accommodating phylogenetic uncertainty in evolutionary studies. Science 288:2349-2350.
61. Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Rannala, and B. Larget. 2000c. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of cospeciation. Evolution 54:352-364.
62. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. R. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Biometrics 17:754-755.
63. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-123 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, New York.
64. Kass, R. E., and A. E. Raftery. 1995. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-795.
65. Kim, J., W. Kim, and C. W. Cunningham. 1999. A new perspective on lower metazoan relationships from 18S rDNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:423-427.
66. Kimura, M. 1980 A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide substitutions. J. Mol. Evol. 16:111-120.
67. Kishino, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequences, and the branching order of Hominoidea. J. Mol. Evol. 29:170-179.
68. Kjer, K. 1995. Use of RNA secondary structure in phylogenetic studies to identify homologous positions: An example of alignment and data presentation from the frogs. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4:314-330.
69. Korber, B., M. Muldoon, J. Theiler, F. Gao, R. Gupta, A. Lapedes, B. H. Hahn, S. Wolinsky, and T. Bhattacharya. 2000. Timing the ancestor of the HIV-1 pandemic strains. Science 288:1789-1796.
70. Larget, B., and D. L. Simon. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759.
71. Lee, D. A., W. G. Lee, and N. Mortimer. 2001. Where and why have all the flowers gone? Depletion and turnover in the New Zealand Cenozoic angiosperm flora in relation to paleogeography and climate. Aust. J. Bot. 49:341-356.
72. Li, S., D. K. Pearl, and H. Doss. 2000. Phylogenetic tree reconstruction using Markov chain Monte Carlo. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 95:493-508.
73. Madigan, D., and A. E. Raftery. 1994. Model selection and accounting for uncertainty in graphical models using Occam's window. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 89:1535-1546.
74. Mau, B., M. A. Newton, and B. Larget. 1999. Bayesian phylogenetic inference via Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Biometrics 55:1-12.
75. Mitchell, A. D., and S. J. Wagstaff. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Chilean Pseudopanax laetevirens. N. Z. J. Bot. 38:409-414.
76. Moulds, M. 1990. Australian cicadas. NSW Press, Kensington, Australia.
77. Myers, J. G. 1929. The taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution of New Zealand cicadas (Homoptera). Trans. Entomol. Soc. London 77:29-60.
78. Rannala, B., and Z. Yang. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: A new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311.
79. Rodrigo, A. G., M. Kelly-Borges, P. R. Bergquist, and P. L. Bergquist. 1993. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. N. Z. J. Bot. 31:257-268.
80. Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimensions of a model. Ann. Stat. 6:461-464.
81. Shimodaira, H. 2001. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods and combining nonnested models with applications to phylogenetic tree selection. Commun. Stat. A Theory Methods. In press.
82. Shimodaira, H., and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1114-1116.
83. Simon, C., F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. K. Flook. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87:651-701.
84. Sota, T., and A. P. Vogler. 2001. Incongruence of mitochondrial and nuclear gene trees in the carabid beetles Ohomopterus. Syst. Biol. 50:39-59.
85. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, and J. Sinsheimer. 2001. Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1001-1013.
86. Sullivan, J., J. A. Markert, and C. W. William. 1997. Phylogeography and molecular systematics of the Peromyscus aztecus species group (Rodentia: Muridae) inferred using parsimony and likelihood. Syst. Biol. 46:426-440.
87. Sullivan, J., D. L. Swofford, and G. J. P. Naylor. 1999. The effect of taxon sampling on estimating rate-heterogeneity parameters of maximum likelihood models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:1347-1356.
88. Sunnucks, P., and D. F. Hales. 1996. Numerous transposed sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I-II in aphids of the genus Sitobion (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:510-524.
89. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
90. Swofford, D. L., G. J. Olsen, P. J. Waddell, and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. Pages 407-514 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
91. Thorne, J. L., H. Kishino, and I. S. Painter. 1998. Estimating the rate of evolution of the rate of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1647-1657.
92. Vijverberg, K., P. Kuperus, J. A. J. Breeuwer, and K. Bachmann. 2000. Incipient adaptive radiation of New Zealand and Australian Microseris (Asteraceae): An amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) study. J. Evol. Biol. 13:997-1008.
93. Waddell, P. J., Y. Cao, J. Hauf, and M. Hasegawa. 1999. Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant. Syst. Biol. 48:31-53.
94. Waddell, P. J., H. Kishino, and R. Ota. 2000. Rapid evaluation of the phylogenetic congruence of sequence data using likelihood ratio tests. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:1988-1922.
95. Wagstaff, S. J., and P. J. Garnock-Jones. 2000. Patterns of diversification in Chionohebe and Parahebe (Scrophularriaceae) inferred from ITS sequences. N. Z. J. Bot. 38:389-407.
96. Wares, J. P. 2000. Patterns of speciation inferred from mitochondrial DNA in North American Chthamalus (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha: Chthamaloidea). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 18:104-116.
97. Waters, J. M., J. AndreÌs LoÌpez, and G. P. Wallis. 2000. Molecular phylogenetics and biogeography of Galaxiid fishes (Osteichthyes: Galaxiidae): Dispersal, vicariance, and the position of Lepidogalaxias salamandroides. Syst. Biol. 49:777-795.
98. Wright, S. D., C. G. Yong, J. W. Dawson, D. J. Whittaker, and R. C. Gardner. 2000. Riding the Ice Age El Nin�o? Pacific biogeography and evolution of Metrosideros subg. Metrosideros (Myrtaceae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:4118-4123.
99. Yang, Z. 1994a. Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. J. Mol. Evol. 39:105-111.
100. Yang, Z. 1994b. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: Approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314.
101. Yang, Z. 1996. Maximum likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596.
102. Yoder, A. D., J. A. Irwin, and B. A. Payseur. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 50:408-424.