Invariable sites models and their use in phylogeny reconstruction

Systematic Biology

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 225-232

  Steel, Mike ^a   Huson, Daniel ^b   Lockhart, Peter J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Covariotide evolution; Invariable sites; LogDet; Sites free to vary

Indexed keywords

HEXAPODA; INSECTA;

RIBOSOME DNA; RNA 18S;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; FLY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

ANIMALS; DIPTERA; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 0034350429     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.225     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ADACHI, J., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1995. Improved dating of the human/chimpanzee separation in the mitochondrial DNA tree: Heterogeneity among amino acids. J. Mol. Evol. 40:622-628.
2. BANDELT, H. J., AND A. W. M. DRESS. 1992. Split decomposition: A new and useful approach to phylogenetic distance data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 1:242-252.
3. CHURCHILL, G. A., A. VON HAESELER, AND W. C. NAVIDI. 1992. Sample size for a phylogenetic inference. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9:753-769.
4. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-410.
5. FITCH, W. M., AND E. MARKOWITZ. 1970. An improved method for determining codon variability in a gene and its application to the rate of fixation of mutations in evolution. Biochem. Genet. 4:579-593.
6. FRIEDRICH, M., AND D. TAUTZ. 1997. An episodic change of rDNA nucleotide substitution rate has occurred during the emergence of the insect order Diptera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:644-653.
7. HASEGAWA, M., AND T. HASHIMOTO. 1993. Ribosomal RNA trees misleading? Nature 361:23.
8. HENDY, M. D., AND D. PENNY. 1989. A framework for the quantitative study of evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 38:310-321.
9. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1997. Is the Felsenstein zone a fly trap? Syst. Biol. 46:69-74.
10. HUELSENBECK, J. P. 1998. Systematic bias in phylogenetic analysis: Is the Strepsiptera problem solved? Syst. Biol. 47:519-537.
11. HUSON, D. H. 1998. SplitsTree: A program for analyzing and visualizing evolutionary data. Bioinformatics 14:68-73.
12. JERMIN, L. S., P. G. FOSTER, D. GRAUR, R. M. LOWE, AND R. H. CROZIEK. 1996. Unbiased estimation of symmetrical directional mutation pressure from protein coding DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 42:476-480.
13. KIM, J. 1996. General inconsistency conditions for maximum parsiomony: Effects of branch lengths and increasing numbers of taxa. Syst. Biol. 45: 363-374.
14. LAKE, J. 1994. Reconstructing evolutionary trees from DNA and protein sequences: Paralinear distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:1455-1459.
15. LOCKHART, P. J., A. W. D. LARKUM, M. A. STEEL, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. PENNY. 1996. Evolution of chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll: The problem of invariant sites in sequence analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1930-1934.
16. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, A. C. BARBROOK, D. HUSON, M. A. CHARLESTON, AND C. J. HOWE. 1998. A covariotide model explains apparent phylogenetic structure of oxygenic photosynthetic lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1183-1188.
17. LOCKHART, P. J., M. A. STEEL, M. D. HENDY, AND D. PENNY. 1994. Recovering evolutionary trees under a more realistic model of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:605-612.
18. MIYAMOTO, M. M., AND W. M. FITCH. 1995. Testing the covarion hypothesis of molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:503-513.
19. PENNY, D., M. D. HENDY, P. J. LOCKHART, AND M. A. STEEL. 1996. Corrected parsimony, minimum evolution, and Hadamard conjugations. Syst. Biol. 45: 596-606.
20. PESOLE, G., G. DELLISANTI, G. PREPARATA, AND C. SACCONE. 1995. The importance of base composition in the correct assessment of genetic distance. J. Mol. Evol. 41:1124-1127.
21. PHILIPPE, H., AND J. LAURENT. 1998. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8: 616-623.
22. PHILIPPE, H., P. LOPEZ, H. BRINKMANN, K. BUDIN, A. GERMOT, J. LAURENT, D. MOREIRA, M. MÜLLER, AND H. LE GUYADER. (in press) Tree reconstruction and the phylogeny of the eukaryotes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.
23. REEVES, J. H. 1992. Heterogenetity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochonadrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35:17-31.
24. SAITOU, N., AND T. IMANISHI. 1989. Relative efficiencies of the Fitch-Margoliash, maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, minimum-evolution, and neighbor joining methods of phylogenetic tree construction in obtaining the correct tree. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:514-525.
25. SHOEMAKER, J. S., AND W. M. FITCH. 1989. Evidence from nuclear sequences that invariable sites should be considered when sequence divergence is calculated. Mol. Biol. Evol. 6:270-289.
26. SIDOW, A., T. NGUYEN, AND T. P. SPEED. 1992. Estimating the fraction of invariable codons with a capture-recapture method. J. Mol. Evol. 35:253-260.
27. STEEL, M. A. 1994. Recovery of a tree from the leaf coloration it generates under a Markov model. Appl. Math. Lett. 7:19-23.
28. STEEL, M. A., P. J. LOCKHART, AND D. PENNY. 1993. Confidence in evolutionary trees from biological sequence data. Nature 364:440-442.
29. SULLIVAN, J., K. E. HOLSINGER, AND C. SIMON. 1996. The effect of topology on estimates of among site rate variation. J. Mol. Evol. 42:308-312.
30. SWOFFORD, D. L., G. J. OLSEN, P. J. WADDELL, AND D. M. HILLIS. 1996. Phylogenetic Inference. Pages 459-461 in Molecular systematics, 2nd edition (D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable, eds.). Sinaur, Sunderland, Massuchusetts.
31. SWOFFORD, D. L. 1999. PAUP 4.65 Sinaur, Sunderland. Massuchusetts.
32. THOMPSON, S. K. 1992. Sampling. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
33. VAN DE PEER, Y., S. A. RENSING, U.-G. MAIER, AND R. DEWACHTER. 1996. Substitution rate calibration of small subunit ribosomal subunit RNA identifies Chlorarachnida nucleomorphs as remnants of green algae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7732-7736.
34. WADDELL, P. J. 1996. Statistical methods of phylogenetic analysis, including Hadamard conjugations, LogDet transforms, and maximum likelihood. Ph.D. dissertation, Massey Univ., Palmerston North, New Zealand.
35. WADDELL, P. J., D. PENNY, AND T. MOORE. 1997. Hadamard conjugations and modeling sequence evolution with unequal rates across sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:33-50.
36. WADDELL, P. J., C. YING, J. HAUF, AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant. Syst. Biol. 48:31-53.
37. WHITING, M. F., J. C. CARPENTER, Q. D. WHEELER, AND W. C. WHEELER. 1997. The Strepsiptera problem: Phylogeny of the Holmetabolous insect orders inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequences and morphology. Syst. Biol. 46:1-68.
38. WHITFIELD, J. B., AND S. A. CAMERON. 1998. Hierarchical analysis of variation in the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene among Hymenoptera. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1728-1743.
39. YANG, Z. 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:367-372.