The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 138-145

  Searle, Jennifer S ^a   Schollaert, Kaila L ^a   Wilkins, Benjamin J ^b   Sanchez, Yolanda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APC PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN 20; CYCLIC AMP DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; CYCLINE; DNA; PROTEIN SUBUNIT; ANAPHASE PROMOTING COMPLEX; ANAPHASE-PROMOTING COMPLEX; CDC20 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; PROTEIN KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL CYCLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DAMAGE; GENE MUTATION; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN TARGETING; YEAST; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHOSPHORYLATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CYCLIC AMP-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASES; DNA DAMAGE; MITOSIS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN KINASES; PROTEIN SUBUNITS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASE COMPLEXES;

EID: 1642602693     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb1092     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cohen-Fix, O., Peters, J. M., Kirschner, M. W. & Koshland, D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 10, 3081-3093 (1996).
2. Peters, J. M. The anaphase-promoting complex: Proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell 9, 931-943 (2002).
3. Irniger, S., Piatti, S., Michaelis, C. & Nasmyth, K. Genes involved in sister chromatid separation are needed for B-type cyclin proteolysis in budding yeast. Cell 81, 269-278 (1995).
4. Lim, H. H., Goh, P. Y. & Surana, U. Cdc20 is essential for the cyclosome-mediated proteolysis of both Pds1 and Clb2 during M phase in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 8, 231-234 (1998).
5. Wasch, R. & Cross, F. R. APC-depenclent proteolysis of the mitotic cyclin Clb2 is essential for mitotic exit. Nature 418, 556-562 (2002).
6. Sanchez, Y. et al. Control of the DNA damage checkpoint by chk1 and rad53 protein kinases through distinct mechanisms. Science 286, 1166-1171 (1999).
7. Gardner, R., Putnam, C. W. & Weinert, T. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18, 3173-3185 (1999).
8. Wang, Y., Hu, F. & Elledge, S. J. The Bfa1/Bub2 GAP complex comprises a universal checkpoint required to prevent mitotic exit. Curr. Biol. 10, 1379-1382 (2000).
9. Hu, F. et al. Regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex by Cdc5 and cell cycle checkpoints. Cell 107, 655-665 (2001).
10. Wang, H., Liu, D., Wang, Y., Qin, J. & Elledge, S. J. Pds1 phosphorylation in response to DNA damage is essential for its DNA damage checkpoint function. Genes Dev 15, 1361-1372 (2001).
11. Cohen-Fix, O. & Koshland, D. Pds1p of budding yeast has dual roles: Inhibition of anaphase initiation and regulation of mitotic exit. Genes Dev. 13, 1950-1959 (1999).
12. Tinker-Kulberg, R. L. & Morgan, D. O. Pds1 and Esp1 control both anaphase and mitotic exit in normal cells and after DNA damage. Genes Dev. 13, 1936-1949 (1999).
13. Kishimoto, N. & Yamashita, I. Cyclic AMP regulates cell size of Schizosaccharomyces pombe through Cdc25 mitotic inducer. Yeast 16, 523-529 (2000).
14. Anghileri, P. et al. Chromosome separation and exit from mitosis in budding yeast: Dependence on growth revealed by cAMP-mediated inhibition. Exp. Cell Res. 250, 510-523 (1999).
15. Yamada, H., Kumada, K. & Yanagida, M. Distinct subunit functions and cell cycle regulated phosphorylation of 20S APC/cyclosome required for anaphase in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 110, 1793-1804 (1997).
16. Heo, S. J., Tatebayashi, K. & Ikeda, H. The budding yeast cohesin gene SCC1/MCD1/RHC21 genetically interacts with PKA, CDK and APC. Curr. Genet. 36, 329-338 (1999).
17. Yamashita, Y. M. et al. 20S cyclosome complex formation and proteolytic activity inhibited by the cAMP/PKA pathway. Nature 384, 276-279 (1996).
18. Kotani, S. et al. PKA and MPF-activated polo-like kinase regulate anaphase-promoting complex activity and mitosis progression. Mol. Cell 1, 371-380 (1998).
19. Cannon, J. F. & Tatchell, K. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding subunits of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2653-2663 (1987).
20. Toda, T. et al. Cloning and characterization of BCY1, a locus encoding a regulatory subunit of the cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 1371-1377 (1987).
21. Toda, T., Cameron, S., Sass, P., Zoller, M. & Wigler, M. Three different genes in S. cerevisiae encode the catalytic subunits of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Cell 50, 277-287 (1987).
22. Weinert, T. A. & Hartwell, L. H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics 134, 63-80 (1993).
23. Goh, P. Y., Lim, H. H. & Surana, U. Cdc20 protein contains a destruction-box but, unlike Clb2, its proteolysis is not acutely dependent on the activity of anaphase-promoting complex. Eur. J. Biochem. 267, 434-449 (2000).
24. Prinz, S., Hwang, E. S., Visintin, R. & Amon, A. The regulation of Cdc20 proteolysis reveals a role for APC components Cdc23 and Cdc27 during S phase and early mitosis. Curr. Biol. 8, 750-760 (1998).
25. Hwang, L. H. et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: A target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041-1044 (1998).
26. Sanchez, Y., Zhou, Z., Huang, M., Kemp, B. E. & Elledge, S. J. Analysis of budding yeast kinases controlled by DNA damage. Methods Enzymol. 283, 398-410 (1997).
27. O'Neill, T. et al. Determination of substrate motifs for human Chk1 and hCds1/Chk2 by the oriented peptide library approach. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 16102-16115 (2002).
28. Pan, X. & Heitman, J. Protein kinase A operates a molecular switch that governs yeast pseudohyphal differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 3981-393 (2002).
29. Portela, P., Zaremberg, V. & Moreno, S. Evaluation of in vivo activation of protein kinase A under non-dissociable conditions through the overexpression of wild-type and mutant regulatory subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 147, 1149-1159 (2001).
30. Colombo, S. et al. Involvement of distinct G-proteins, Gpa2 and Ras, in glucose- and intracellular acidification-induced cAMP signalling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 17, 3326-3341 (1998).
31. Irniger, S., Baumer, M. & Braus, G. H. Glucose and ras activity influence the ubiquitin ligases APC/C and SCF in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 154, 1509-1521 (2000).
32. Palmer, R. E., Koval, M. & Koshland, D. The dynamics of chromosome movement in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell Biol. 109, 3355-3366 (1989).
33. Bolte, M., Dieckhoff, P., Krause, C., Braus, G. H. & Irniger, S. Synergistic inhibition of APC/C by glucose and activated Ras proteins can be mediated by each of the Tpk1-3 proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiology 149, 1205-1216 (2003).
34. Foiani, M., Marini, F., Gamba, D., Lucchini, G. & Plevani, P. The B subunit of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae executes an essential function at the initial stage of DNA replication. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 923-933 (1994).
35. Pan, X., Harashima, T. & Heitman, J. Signal transduction cascades regulating pseudohyphal differentiation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3, 567-572 (2000).