The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 18, 2003, Pages 6585-6596

  Aylon, Yael ^a   Kupiec, Martin ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN MAD2; RAD24 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL DEATH; CELL SURVIVAL; CHROMOSOME DAMAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA RECOMBINATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FUNGUS MUTANT; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; METAPHASE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CALCIUM-BINDING PROTEINS; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA; DNA REPAIR; FUNGAL PROTEINS; GENETIC TECHNIQUES; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; KINETICS; MUTATION; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

FUNGI; SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0042691728     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6585-6596.2003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aboussekhra, A., J. E. Vialard, D. E. Morrison, M. A. de la Torre-Ruiz, L. Cernakova, F. Fabre, and N. F. Lowndes. 1996. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 15:3912-3922.
2. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshietz, G. Bitan-Banin, and M. Kupiec. 2003. Molecular dissection of mitotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:1403-1417.
3. Bashkirov, V. I., J. S. King, E. V. Bashkirova, J. Schmuckli-Maurer, and W. D. Heyer. 2000. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:4393-4404.
4. Booth, C., E. Griffith, G. Brady, and D. Lydall. 2001. Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res. 29:4414-4422.
5. Carr, A. M. 1997. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr. Opin. Genet. Deversion 7:93-98.
6. Frank-Vaillant, M., and S. Marcand. 2001. nonhomologous end joining regulation by mating type is exercised through a novel protein, Lif2p, essential to the ligase IV pathway. Genes Deversion 15:3005-3012.
7. Garber, P. M., and J. Rine. 2002. Overlapping roles of the spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints in the cell-cycle response to altered chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161:521-534.
8. 2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18:3173-3185.
9. Garner, M., S. van Kreeveld, and T. T. Su. 2001. mei-31 and bub1 block mitosis at two distinct steps in response to incomplete DNA replication in Drosophila embryos. Curr. Biol. 11:1595-1599.
10. Green, C. M., H. Erdjument-Bromage, P. Tempst, and N. F. Lowndes. 2000. A novel Rad24 checkpoint protein complex closely related to replication factor C. Curr Biol. 10:39-42.
11. Griffiths, D. J., N. C. Barbet, S. McCready, A. R. Lehmann, and A. M. Carr. 1995. Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins. EMBO J. 14:5812-5823.
12. Grushcow, J. M., T. M. Holzen, K. J. Park, T. Weinert, M. Lichten, and D. K. Bishop. 1999. Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes MEC1, RAD17 and RAD24 are required for normal meiotic recombination partner choice. Genetics 153:607-620.
13. Haber, J. E., W. Y. Leung, R. H. Borts, and M. Lichten. 1991. The frequency of meiotic recombination in yeast is independent of the number and position of homologous donor sequences: implications for chromosome pairing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:1120-1124.
14. Hartwell, L., T. Weinert, L. Kadyk, and B. Garvik. 1994. Cell cycle check-points, genomic integrity, and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 59:259-263.
15. Heude, M., and F. Fabre. 1993. a/alpha-control of DNA repair in the yeast Saccharomyees cerevisiae: genetic and physiological aspects. Genetics 133: 489-498.
16. Inbar, O., and M. Kupiec. 1999. Homology search and choice of homologous partner during mitotic recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:4134-4142.
17. Inbar, O., B. Liefshitz, G. Bitan, and M. Kupiec. 2000. The relationship between homology length and crossing over during the repair of a broken chromosome. J. Biol. Chem. 275:30833-30838.
18. Jinks-Robertson, S., and T. D. Petes. 1986. Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes. Genetics 114:731-752.
19. Kiser, G. L., and T. A. Weinert. 1996. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:703-718.
20. Klein, H. L. 2001. Spontaneous chromosome loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is suppressed by DNA damage checkpoint functions. Genetics 159:1501-1509.
21. Kondo, T., T. Wakayama, T. Naiki, K. Matsumoto, and K. Sugimoto. 2001. Recruitment of Mec1 and Ddc1 checkpoint proteins to double-strand breaks through distinct mechanisms. Science 294:867-870.
22. 2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94:399-409.
23. Lowndes, N. F., and J. R. Murguia. 2000. Sensing and responding to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Deversion 10:17-25.
24. Lydall, D., and T. Weinert. 1995. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science 270:1488-1491.
25. Malkova, A., E. L. Ivanov, and J. E. Haber. 1996. Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:7131-7136.
26. Maringele, L., and D. Lydall. 2002. EXO1-dependent single-stranded DNA at telomeres activates subsets of DNA damage and spindle checkpoint pathways in budding yeast yku70Delta mutants. Genes Deversion 16:1919-1933.
27. Melo, J., and D. Toczyski. 2002. A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14:237-245.
28. Mercier, G., Y. Denis, P. Marc, L. Picard, and M. Dutreix. 2001. Transcriptional induction of repair genes during slowing of replication in irradiated Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 487:157-172.
29. Myung, K., and R. D. Kolodner. 2002. Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4500-4507.
30. Paciotti, V., M. Clerici, M. Scotti, G. Lucchini, and M. P. Longhese. 2001. Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:3913-3925.
31. Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Reversion 63:349-404.
32. Roeder, G. S., and J. M. Bailis. 2000. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16:395-403.
33. Rouse, J., and S. P. Jackson. 2002. Led1p recruits Mec1p to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell 9:857-869.
34. Sandell, L. L., and V. A. Zakian. 1993. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75:729-739.
35. Sung, P., K. M. Trujillo, and S. Van Komen. 2000. Recombination factors of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 451:257-275.
36. Thompson, D. A., and F. W. Stahl. 1999. Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153:621-641.
37. Valencia, M., M. Bentele, M. B. Vaze, G. Herrmann, E. Kraus, S. E. Lee, P. Schar, and J. E. Haber. 2001. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 414:666-669.
38. Vendovas, C., M. E. Colvin, and M. P. Thelen. 2002. Molecular modeling-based analysis of interactions in the RFC-dependent clamp-loading process. Protein Sci. 11:2403-2416.
39. Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1990. Characterization of RAD9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and evidence that its function acts posttranslationally in cell cycle arrest after DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:6554-6564.
40. Weinert, T. A., and L. H. Hartwell. 1988. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241: 317-322.
41. Yan, Y. X., R. H. Schiestl, and L. Prakash. 1995. Mating-type suppression of the DNA-repair defect of the yeast rad6 delta mutation requires the activity of genes in the RAD52 epistasis group. Curr. Genet. 28:12-18.
42. Zou, L., D. Cortez, and S. J. Elledge. 2002. Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin. Genes Deversion 16:198-208.