Natural sweeteners: The relevance of food naturalness for consumers, food security aspects, sustainability and health impacts

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Volumn 17, Issue 17, 2020, Pages 1-22

  Saraiva, Ariana ^a   Carrascosa, Conrado ^a   Raheem, Dele ^b   Ramos, Fernando ^c,d   Raposo, António ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^d Campus Universitário de Santiago   (Portugal)

^e TON DUC THANG UNIVERSITY   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Consumer s perceptions and attitudes; Food industry; Food security; Health impacts; Natural food products; Natural sweeteners; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ERYTHRITOL; FOOD ADDITIVE; GLYCYRRHIZIC ACID; NATURAL PRODUCT; STEVIOL; SWEETENING AGENT; TAGATOSE; TERPENOID DERIVATIVE; THAUMATIN;

CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOR; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD MARKET; FOOD QUALITY; FOOD SECURITY; HEALTH IMPACT; SUSTAINABILITY;

BIOTRANSFORMATION; CONSUMER; CRYSTALLIZATION; ENDOTHELIUM; EVAPORATION; FOOD AVAILABILITY; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PROCESSING; FOOD SAFETY; FOOD SECURITY; GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; HYDROGENATION; INDUSTRIALIZATION; ION EXCHANGE CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICROWAVE ASSISTED EXTRACTION; MOTIVATION; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PERCEPTION; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; REVIEW; THERMOSTABILITY; CATERING SERVICE; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; TASTE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD SUPPLY; HUMANS; SWEETENING AGENTS; TASTE;

EID: 85090026358     PISSN: 16617827     EISSN: 16604601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176285     Document Type: Review

References (192)

1. Asioli, D.; Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Caputo, V.; Vecchio, R.; Annunziata, A.; Næs, T.; Varela, P. Making sense of the “clean label” trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 58–71. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Lusk, J.L. Unnaturally Delicious: How Science and Technology Are Serving up Super Foods to Save the World, 1st ed.; St. Martin’s Press: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 189–213.
3. Meneses, Y.; Cannon, K.J.; Flores, R.A. Keys to understanding and addressing consumer perceptions and concerns about processed foods. Cereal Foods World. 2014, 59, 141–146. [CrossRef]
4. Augustin, M.A.; Riley, M.; Stockmann, R.; Bennett, L.; Kahl, A.; Lockett, T.; Osmond, M.; Sanguansri, P.; Stonehouse, W.; Zajac, I.; et al. Role of food processing in food and nutrition security. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 56, 115–125. [CrossRef]
5. Weaver, C.M.; Dwyer, J.; Fulgoni, V.L., III; King, J.C.; Leveille, G.A.; MacDonald, R.S.; Ordovas, J.; Schnakenberg, D. Processed foods: Contributions to nutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 1525–1542. [CrossRef]
6. Princen, T. The shading and distancing of commerce: When internalization is not enough. Ecol Econ 1997, 20, 235–253. [CrossRef]
7. Weis, T. The Global Food Economy: The Battle for the Future of Farming, 1st ed.; Fernowood Publishing: Black Point, NS, Canada, 2007; pp. 11–47.
8. Román, S.; Sánchez-Siles, L.M.; Siegrist, M. The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 67, 44–57. [CrossRef]
9. Philippe, R.N.; De Mey, M.; Anderson, J.; Ajikumar, P.K. Biotechnological production of natural zero-calorie sweeteners. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 155–161. [CrossRef]
10. Mooradian, A.D.; Smith, M.; Tokuda, M. The role of artificial and natural sweeteners in reducing the consumption of table sugar: A narrative review. Clin. Nutr. Espen 2017, 18, 1–8. [CrossRef]
11. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C. Natural food additives: Quo vadis? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 284–295. [CrossRef]
12. Serra-Majem, L.; Raposo, A.; Aranceta-Bartrina, J.; Varela-Moreiras, G.; Logue, C.; Laviada, H.; Socolovsky, S.; Pérez-Rodrigo, C.; Aldrete-Velasco, J.A.; Meneses Sierra, E.; et al. Ibero–American consensus on low-and no-calorie sweeteners: Safety, nutritional aspects and benefits in food and beverages. Nutrients 2018, 10, 818. [CrossRef]
13. Carocho, M.; Barreiro, M.F.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C. Adding molecules to food, pros and cons: A review on synthetic and natural food additives. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 377–399. [CrossRef]
14. Wilson, E.O. Biophilia, 1st ed.; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984; pp. 1–23.
15. Rozin, P.; Fischler, C.; Shields-Argelès, C. European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural. Appetite 2012, 59, 448–455. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Nielsen. We Are What We Eat, Healthy Eating Trends around the World. January 2015. Available online: https://www.nielsen.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/january-2015-global-health-and-wellness-report.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2020).
17. GoodMills Innovation. Kampffmeyer Food Innovation Study. November 2012. Available online: http://goodmillsinnovation.com/sites/kfi.kampffmeyer.faktor3server.de/files/attachments/1_pi_kfi_ cleanlabelstudy_english_final.pdf (accessed on 27 July 2020).
18. Rozin, P. The meaning of “natural” process more important than content. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 16, 652–658. [CrossRef]
19. Rozin, P. Naturalness judgments by lay Americans: Process dominates content in judgments of food or water acceptability and naturalness. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 2006, 1, 91–97.
20. Rozin, P.; Spranca, M.; Krieger, Z.; Neuhaus, R.; Surillo, D.; Swerdlin, A.; Wood, K. Preference for natural: Instrumental and ideational/moral motivations, and the contrast between foods and medicines. Appetite 2004, 43, 147–154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Beck, U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, 1st ed.; Sage Publications Ltd.: London, UK, 1992; pp. 19–91.
22. Bánáti, D. Consumer response to food scandals and scares. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 56–60. [CrossRef]
23. Knowles, T.; Moody, R.; McEachern, M.G. European food scares and their impact on EU food policy. Br. Food J. 2007, 109, 43–67. [CrossRef]
24. Aktar, W.; Sengupta, D.; Chowdhury, A. Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdiscip. Toxicol. 2009, 2, 1–12. [CrossRef]
25. Lucová, M.; Hojerová, J.; Pažoureková, S.; Klimová, Z. Absorption of triphenylmethane dyes Brilliant Blue and Patent Blue through intact skin, shaven skin and lingual mucosa from daily life products. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 19–27. [CrossRef]
26. Grunert, K.G.; Bredahl, L.; Scholderer, J. Four questions on European consumers’ attitudes toward the use of genetic modification in food production. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2003, 4, 435–445. [CrossRef]
27. Godfray, H.C.J.; Beddington, J.R.; Crute, I.R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J.F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S.M.; Toulmin, C. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 2010, 327, 812–818. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
28. Asioli, D.; Canavari, M.; Pignatti, E.; Obermowe, T.; Sidali, K.L.; Vogt, C.; Spiller, A. Sensory experiences and expectations of Italian and German organic consumers. J. Int. Food Agribus. Mark. 2014, 26, 13–27. [CrossRef]
29. Caputo, V.; Nayga, R.M., Jr.; Scarpa, R. Food miles or carbon emissions? Exploring labelling preference for food transport footprint with a stated choice study. Aust. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 57, 465–482. [CrossRef]
30. Frewer, L.J.; van Trijp, H. Understanding Consumers of Food Products, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 21–24.
31. MacFie, H. Preference mapping and food product development. In Consumer-Led Food Product Development, 1st ed.; MacFie, H., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing Limited: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 551–593.
32. Grunert, K.G. Trends in food choice and nutrition. In Consumer Attitudes to Food Quality Products: Emphasis on Southern Europe, 1st ed.; Klopčič, M., Kuipers, A., Hocquette, J.-F., Eds.; Wageningen Academic Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 23–30.
33. Kearney, J. Food consumption trends and drivers. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2010, 365, 2793–2807. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
34. Krovetz, H. The effect of water-use labeling and information on consumer valuation for water sustainable food choices in California. In Proceedings of the Environmental Sciences Senior Thesis Symposium, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA, 23 April 2016.
35. Lachat, C.; Nago, E.; Verstraeten, R.; Roberfroid, D.; Van Camp, J.; Kolsteren, P. Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: A systematic review of the evidence. Obes. Rev. 2012, 13, 329–346. [CrossRef]
36. Chrysochou, P.; Askegaard, S.; Grunert, K.G.; Kristensen, D.B. Social discourses of healthy eating. A market segmentation approach. Appetite 2010, 55, 288–297. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Pohjanheimo, T.; Paasovaara, R.; Luomala, H.; Sandell, M. Food choice motives and bread liking of consumers embracing hedonistic and traditional values. Appetite 2010, 54, 170–180. [CrossRef]
38. Mai, R.; Hoffmann, S. How to combat the unhealthy = tasty intuition: The influencing role of health consciousness. J. Public Policy Mark. 2015, 34, 63–83. [CrossRef]
39. Steptoe, A.; Pollard, T.M.; Wardle, J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25, 267–284. [CrossRef]
40. Bearth, A.; Cousin, M.E.; Siegrist, M. The consumer’s perception of artificial food additives: Influences on acceptance, risk and benefit perceptions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2014, 38, 14–23. [CrossRef]
41. Chen, M.F. The gender gap in food choice motives as determinants of consumers’ attitudes toward GM foods in Taiwan. Br. Food J. 2011, 113, 697–709. [CrossRef]
42. Chen, M.F. Consumers’ health and taste attitude in Taiwan: The impacts of modern tainted food worries and gender difference. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 526–540. [CrossRef]
43. Dickson-Spillmann, M.; Siegrist, M.; Keller, C. Attitudes toward chemicals are associated with preference for natural food. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 149–156. [CrossRef]
44. Huotilainen, A.; Tuorila, H. Social representation of new foods has a stable structure based on suspicion and trust. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 565–572. [CrossRef]
45. Siegrist, M.; Stampfli, N.; Kastenholz, H.; Keller, C. Perceived risks and perceived benefits of different nanotechnology foods and nanotechnology food packaging. Appetite 2008, 51, 283–290. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
46. Pieniak, Z.; Verbeke, W.; Vanhonacker, F.; Guerrero, L.; Hersleth, M. Association between traditional food consumption and motives for food choice in six European countries. Appetite 2009, 53, 101–108. [CrossRef]
47. Olbrich, R.; Hundt, M.; Grewe, G. Willingness to pay in food retailing—An empirical study of consumer behaviour in the context of the proliferation of organic products. In European Retail Research, 1st ed.; Foscht, T., Morschett, D., Rudolph, T., Schnedlitz, P., Schramm-Klein, H., Swoboda, B., Eds.; Springer Gabler: Wiesbaden, Germany, 2015; pp. 67–101.
48. Hsu, S.Y.; Chang, C.C.; Lin, T.T. An analysis of purchase intentions toward organic food on health consciousness and food safety with/under structural equation modeling. Br. Food J. 2016, 118, 200–216. [CrossRef]
49. Bäckström, A.; Pirttilä-Backman, A.M.; Tuorila, H. Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite 2004, 43, 75–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
50. Eertmans, A.; Victoir, A.; Vansant, G.; Van den Bergh, O. Food-related personality traits, food choice motives and food intake: Mediator and moderator relationships. Food Qual. Prefer. 2005, 16, 714–726. [CrossRef]
51. Onwezen, M.C.; Bartels, J. Development and cross-cultural validation of a shortened social representations scale of new foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2013, 28, 226–234. [CrossRef]
52. Huotilainen, A.; Pirttilä-Backman, A.M.; Tuorila, H. How innovativeness relates to social representation of new foods and to the willingness to try and use such foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006, 17, 353–361. [CrossRef]
53. Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Consumers’ changing attitudes towards functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 1–12. [CrossRef]
54. Mouta, J.S.; de Sá, N.C.; Menezes, E.; Melo, L. Effect of institutional sensory test location and consumer attitudes on acceptance of foods and beverages having different levels of processing. Food Qual. Prefer. 2016, 48 Pt A, 262–267. [CrossRef]
55. Tobler, C.; Visschers, V.H.; Siegrist, M. Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite 2011, 57, 674–682. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
56. Gomez, P.; Schneid, N.; Delaere, F. How often should I eat it? Product correlates and accuracy of estimation of appropriate food consumption frequency. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 1–7. [CrossRef]
57. Hemmerling, S.; Canavari, M.; Spiller, A. Preference for naturalness of european organic Consumers: First evidence of an attitude-liking-gap. Br. Food J. 2016, 118, 2287–2307. [CrossRef]
58. Oellingrath, I.M.; Hersleth, M.; Svendsen, M.V. Association between parental motives for food choice and eating patterns of 12-to 13-year-old Norwegian children. Public Health Nutr. 2013, 16, 2023–2031. [CrossRef]
59. Phan, U.T.; Chambers, E. Motivations for choosing various food groups based on individual foods. Appetite 2016, 105, 204–211. [CrossRef]
60. Kraus, A. Factors influencing the decisions to buy and consume functional food. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 1622–1636. [CrossRef]
61. Urala, N.; Lähteenmäki, L. Attitudes behind consumers’ willingness to use functional foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 793–803. [CrossRef]
62. Lähteenmäki, L.; Grunert, K.; Ueland, Ø.; Åström, A.; Arvola, A.; Bech-Larsen, T. Acceptability of genetically modified cheese presented as real product alternative. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13, 523–533. [CrossRef]
63. Lusk, J.L.; Crespi, J.M.; Cherry, J.B.C.; Mcfadden, B.R.; Martin, L.E.; Bruce, A.S. An fMRI investigation of consumer choice regarding controversial food technologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 40, 209–220. [CrossRef]
64. Grubor, A.; Djokic, N.; Djokic, I.; Kovac-Znidersic, R. Application of health and Taste attitude scales in Serbia. Br. Food J. 2015, 117, 840–860. [CrossRef]
65. Pollard, J.; Greenwood, D.; Kirk, S.; Cade, J. Motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5, 479–486. [CrossRef]
66. Pollard, T.M.; Steptoe, A.; Wardle, J. Motives underlying healthy eating: Using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1998, 30, 165–179. [CrossRef]
67. Steptoe, A.; Wardle, J. Motivational factors as mediators of socioeconomic variations in dietary intake patterns. Psychol Health 1999, 14, 391–402. [CrossRef]
68. Thong, N.T.; Solgaard, H.S. Consumer’s food motives and seafood consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 2017, 56, 181–188. [CrossRef]
69. Lockie, S.; Lyons, K.; Lawrence, G.; Mummery, K. Eating “Green”: Motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociol. Rural. 2002, 42, 23–40. [CrossRef]
70. Pieniak, Z.; Perez-Cueto, F.; Verbeke, W. Nutritional status, self identification as a traditional food consumer and motives for food choice in six european countries. Br. Food J. 2013, 115, 1297–1312. [CrossRef]
71. Brunner, T.A.; Van der Horst, K.; Siegrist, M. Convenience food products. Drivers for consumption. Appetite 2010, 55, 498–506. [CrossRef]
72. Roininen, K.; Tuorila, H. Health and taste attitudes in the prediction of use frequency and choice between less healthy and more healthy snacks. Food Qual. Prefer. 1999, 10, 357–365. [CrossRef]
73. Zandstra, E.H.; De Graaf, C.; Van Staveren, W.A. Influence of health and taste attitudes on consumption of low-and high-fat foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2001, 12, 75–82. [CrossRef]
74. Carrillo, E.; Prado-Gascó, V.; Fiszman, S.; Varela, P. Why buying functional foods? Understanding spending behaviour through structural equation modelling. Food Res. Int. 2013, 50, 361–368. [CrossRef]
75. Devcich, D.A.; Pedersen, I.K.; Petrie, K.J. You eat what you are: Modern health worries and the acceptance of natural and synthetic additives in functional foods. Appetite 2007, 48, 333–337. [CrossRef]
76. Pokorný, J. Natural antioxidants for food use. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1991, 2, 223–227. [CrossRef]
77. Lindley, M.G. Natural High-Potency Sweeteners. In Sweeteners and Sugar Alternatives in Food Technology, 2nd ed.; O’Donnell, K., Kearsley, M.W., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester West Sussex, UK, 2012; pp. 185–212.
78. Drewnowski, A.; Mennella, J.A.; Johnson, S.L.; Bellisle, F. Sweetness and food preference. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1142–1148. [CrossRef]
79. Marcus, J.B. A taste primer. In Aging, Nutrition and Taste: Nutrition, Foods Science and Culinary Perspectives for Aging Tastefully; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; p. 114.
80. Belloir, C.; Neiers, F.; Briand, L. Sweeteners and sweetness enhancers. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2017, 20, 279–285. [CrossRef]
81. Laffitte, A.; Neiers, F.; Briand, L. Characterization of taste compounds: Chemical structures and sensory properties. In Flavour: From Food to Perception; Guichard, E., Salles, C., Morzel, M., Le Bon, A.-M., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 154–191.
82. Statista. Sugar Consumption Worldwide 2009/10–2019/20. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/249681/total-consumption-of-sugar-worldwide/(accessed on 12 May 2020).
83. World Health Organization (WHO). Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Available online: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en/(accessed on 12 May 2020).
84. Grembecka, M. Natural sweeteners in a human diet. Rocz. Państwowego Zakładu Hig. 2015, 66, 195–202.
85. Chéron, J.-B.; Marchal, A.; Fiorucci, S. Natural sweeteners. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Varelis, P., Melton, L., Shahidi, F., Eds.; Elsevier: Amesterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 189–195.
86. Kroger, M.; Meister, K.; Kava, R. Low-calorie sweeteners and other sugar substitutes: A review of the safety issues. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2006, 5, 35–47. [CrossRef]
87. Carocho, M.; Morales, P.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Sweeteners as food additives in the XXI century: A review of what is known, and what is to come. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2017, 107, 302–317. [CrossRef]
88. Shah, R.; Jager, L.S. Recent analytical methods for the analysis of sweeteners in food: A regulatory perspective. Food Drug Adm. Pap. 2017, 5, 13–32.
89. Mortensen, A. Sweeteners permitted in the European Union: Safety aspects. Scand. J. Food Nutr. 2006, 50, 104–116. [CrossRef]
90. Fry, J.C. Natural low-calorie sweeteners. In Natural Food Additives, Ingredients and Flavourings; Baines, D., Seal, R., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 41–75.
91. Tappy, L.; Le, K.A. Metabolic effects of fructose and the worldwide increase in obesity. Physiol. Rev. 2010, 90, 23–46. [CrossRef]
92. The Commission of the European Communities. Commission decision of 25 September 2001 authorising the placing on the market of trehalose as a novel food or novel food ingredient under Regulation (EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2001, L269, 17.
93. BeMiller, J.N. Oligosaccharides. In Carbohydrate Chemistry for Food Scientists; Elsevier: Amesterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 49–74.
94. Grembecka, M. Sugar alcohols—their role in the modern world of sweeteners: A review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2015, 241, 1–14. [CrossRef]
95. Chades, T.; Scully, S.M.; Ingvadottir, E.M.; Orlygsson, J. Fermentation of mannitol extracts from brown macro algae by Thermophilic Clostridia. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1931. [CrossRef]
96. Andersen, R.; Sørensen, A. Separation and determination of alditols and sugars by high-pH anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 897, 195–204. [CrossRef]
97. Ruiz-Ojeda, F.J.; Plaza-Díaz, J.; Sáez-Lara, M.J.; Gil, A. Effects of sweeteners on the gut microbiota: A review of experimental studies and clinical trials. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 31–48. [CrossRef]
98. Saraiva, A.; Carrascosa, C.; Raheem, D.; Ramos, F.; Raposo, A. Maltitol: Analytical Determination Methods, Applications in the Food Industry, Metabolism and Health Impacts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5227. [CrossRef]
99. Alternative Sweeteners, 4th ed.; O’Brien-Nabors, L. (Ed.) CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016.
100. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Call for Technical Data on Sweeteners Authorised as Food Additives in the EU. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/consultations/call/call-technical-data-sweeteners-authorised-food-additives-eu (accessed on 12 May 2020).
101. Swiader, K.; Wegner, K.; Piotrowska, A.; Tan, F.-J.; Sadowska, A. Plants as a source of natural high-intensity sweeteners: A review. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019, 92, 160–171.
102. Gu, W.; Rebsdorf, A.; Anker, C.; Gregersen, S.; Hermansen, K.; Geuns, J.M.C.; Jeppesen, P.B. Steviol glucuronide, a metabolite of steviol glycosides, potently stimulates insulin secretion from isolated mouse islets: Studies in vitro. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2019, 2, 1–9. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103. European Food Safety Authority Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (EFSA-FAF Panel). Safety of a proposed amendment of the specifications for steviol glycosides (E 960) as a food additive: To expand the list of steviol glycosides to all those identified in the leaves of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. EFSA J. 2020, 18, 6106.
104. Chatsudthipong, V.; Muanprasat, C. Stevioside and related compounds: Therapeutic benefits beyond sweetness. Pharmacol. Ther. 2009, 121, 41–54. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105. Pielak, M.; Czarniecka-Skubina, E.; Trafiałek, J.; Głuchowski, A. Contemporary trends and habits in the consumption of sugar and sweeteners—A questionnaire survey among poles. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1164. [CrossRef]
106. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Food Additive Status List. Available online: https://www.fda. gov/food/food-additives-petitions/food-additive-status-list (accessed on 12 May 2020).
107. Nazari, S.; Rameshrad, M.; Hosseinzadeh, H. Toxicological effects of Glycyrrhiza glabra (licorice): A review. Phyther. Res. 2017, 31, 1635–1650. [CrossRef]
108. European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Food (EC-SCF). Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Food on Glycyrrhizinic Acid and Its Ammonium Salt. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/sci-com_scf_out186_en.pdf (accessed on 12 May 2020).
109. Masuda, T. Sweet-tasting protein thaumatin: Physical and chemical properties. In Sweeteners: Pharmacology, Biotechnology, and Applications; Merillon, J.-M., Ramawat, K.G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2017; pp. 493–523.
110. European Food Safety Authority Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (EFSA-ANS Panel). Scientific Opinion on the safety of the extension of use of thaumatin (E 957). EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4290.
111. Tschannen, M.P.; Glück, U.; Bircher, A.J.; Heijnen, I.; Pletscher, C. Thaumatin and gum arabic allergy in chewing gum factory workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2017, 60, 1–6. [CrossRef]
112. European Commission. From Farm to Fork. May 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019--2024/european-green-deal/actions-being-taken-eu/farm-fork_en (accessed on 26 May 2020).
113. Rzechonek, D.A.; Dobrowolski, A.; Rymowicz, W.; Mirończuk, A.M. Recent advances in biological production of erythritol. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 620–633. [CrossRef]
114. Moon, H.J.; Jeya, M.; Kim, I.W.; Lee, J.K. Biotechnological production of erythritol and its applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 1017–1025. [CrossRef]
115. Horikita, H.; Hattori, N.; Takagi, Y.; Kawaguchi, G.; Maeda, T. Process for Producing Erythritol. U.S. Patent 4,923,812, 8 May 1990.
116. Cheetham, P.S.J.; Wootton, A.N. Bioconversion of d-galactose into d-tagatose. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1993, 15, 105–108. [CrossRef]
117. Roh, H.J.; Kim, P.; Park, Y.C.; Choi, J.H. Bioconversion of d-galactose into d-tagatose by expression of l-arabinose isomerase. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2000, 31, 1–4. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
118. Roy, S.; Chikkerur, J.; Roy, S.C.; Dhali, A.; Kolte, A.P.; Sridhar, M.; Samanta, A.K. Tagatose as a potential nutraceutical: Production, properties, biological roles, and applications. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 2699–2709. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
119. Oh, D.K. Tagatose: Properties, applications, and biotechnological processes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 76, 1–8. [CrossRef]
120. Food and Agriculture Organization. Steviol Glycosides, Chemical and Technical Assessment Prepared by Harriet Wallin. June 2004. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agns/pdf/jecfa/cta/63/Steviol.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2020).
121. Mathur, S.; Bulchandani, N.; Parihar, S.; Shekhawat, G.S. Critical Review on Steviol Glycosides: Pharmacological, Toxicological and Therapeutic Aspects of High Potency Zero Caloric Sweetener. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 13, 916–928.
122. 2 + water+ ethanol. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2000, 17, 271–282. [CrossRef]
123. Singh, B.; Singh, J.; Kaur, A. Agro-production, processing and utilization of Stevia rebaudiana as natural sweetener. J. Agric. Eng. Food Technol. 2014, 1, 28–31.
124. Rao, A.B.; Reddy, G.R.; Ernala, P.; Sridhar, S.; Ravikumar, Y.V.L. An improvised process of isolation, purification of steviosides from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves and its biological activity. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 2554–2560. [CrossRef]
125. Mukhopadhyay, M.; Panja, P. A novel process for extraction of natural sweetener from licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra) roots. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63, 539–545. [CrossRef]
126. Liao, J.; Qu, B.; Zheng, N. Extraction of Glycyrrhizic Acid from Glycyrrhiza uralensis Using Ultrasound and Its Process Extraction Model. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 319. [CrossRef]
127. Charpe, T.W.; Rathod, V.K. Extraction of glycyrrhizic acid from licorice root using ultrasound: Process intensification studies. Chem. Eng. Process. 2012, 54, 37–41. [CrossRef]
128. Joseph, J.A.; Akkermans, S.; Nimmegeers, P.; Van Impe, J.F. Bioproduction of the recombinant sweet protein thaumatin: Current state of the art and perspectives. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 695. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
129. Nabors, L.O.; Gelardi, R. Alternative Sweeteners, 3rd ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2001; pp. 1–12.
130. Jain, T.; Grover, K. Sweeteners in human nutrition. Int. J. Health Sci. Res. 2015, 5, 439–451.
131. Priya, K.; Gupta, V.R.M.; Srikanth, K. Natural sweeteners: A complete review. J. Pharm. Res. 2011, 4, 2034–2039.
132. Chen, J.C.; Chou, C.C. Cane Sugar Handbook: A Manual for Cane Sugar Manufacturers and Their Chemists, 12th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 375–435.
133. Perkins, T.D.; van den Berg, A.K. Maple syrup—Production, composition, chemistry, and sensory characteristics. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2009, 56, 101–143.
134. Beverage Industry. Natural Sweeteners Resonate with Consumers. September 2018. Available online: https://www.bevindustry.com/articles/91414-natural-sweeteners-resonate-with-consumers?oly_enc_id= 3136G3707801F0X (accessed on 20 May 2020).
135. Baines, D.; Seal, R. Natural Food Additives, Ingredients and Flavourings, 1st ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp. 23–26.
136. EFSA. Scientific opinion on the safety of the proposed extension of use of erythritol (E968) as a food additive. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4033. [CrossRef]
137. Bernt, W.O.; Borzelleca, J.F.; Flamm, G.; Munro, I.C. Erythritol: A review of biological and toxicological studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S191–S197. [CrossRef]
138. Munro, I.C.; Berndt, W.O.; Borzelleca, J.F.; Flamm, G.; Lynch, B.S.; Kennepohl, E.; Bär, E.A.; Modderman, J. Erythritol: An interpretive summary of biochemical, metabolic, toxicological and clinical data. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1998, 36, 1139–1174. [CrossRef]
139. Waalkens-Berendsen, D.H.; Smits-van Prooije, A.E.; Wijnands, M.V.; Bär, A. Two-generation reproduction study of erythritol in rats. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S237–S246. [CrossRef]
140. Shimizu, M.; Katoh, M.; Imamura, M.; Modderman, J. Teratology study of erythritol in rabbits. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S247–S253. [CrossRef]
141. Kawamura, Y.; Saito, Y.; Imamura, M.; Modderman, J.P. Mutagenicity studies on erythritol in bacterial reversion assay systems and in Chinese hamster fibroblast cells. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1996, 24, S261–S263. [CrossRef]
142. Chung, Y.S.; Lee, M. Genotoxicity assessment of erythritol by using short-term assay. Toxicol. Res. 2013, 29, 249–255. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
143. Kawanabe, J.; Hirasawa, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Oda, T.; Ikeda, T. Noncariogenicity of erythritol as a substrate. Caries Res. 1992, 26, 358–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
144. Makinen, K.K.; Saag, M.; Isotupa, K.P.; Olak, J.; Nommela, R.; Soderling, E.; Makinen, P.L. Similarity of the effects of erythritol and xylitol on some risk factors of dental caries. Caries Res. 2005, 39, 207–215. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
145. Hashino, E.; Kuboniwa, M.; Alghamdi, S.A.; Yamaguchi, M.; Yamamoto, R.; Cho, H.; Amano, A. Erythritol alters microstructure and metabolomic profiles of biofilm composed of Streptococcus gordonii and Porphyromonas gingivalis. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2013, 28, 435–451. [CrossRef]
146. Runnel, R.; Mäkinen, K.K.; Honkala, S.; Olak, J.; Mäkinen, P.L.; Nõmmela, R.; Vahlberg, T.; Honkala, E.; Saag, M. Effect of three-year consumption of erythritol, xylitol and sorbitol candies on various plaque and salivary caries-related variables. J. Dent. 2013, 41, 1236–1244. [CrossRef]
147. Honkala, S.; Runnel, R.; Saag, M.; Olak, J.; Nommela, R.; Russak, S.; Makinen, P.L.; Vahlberg, T.; Falony, G.; Makinen, K.; et al. Effect of erythritol and xylitol on dental caries prevention in children. Caries Res. 2014, 48, 482–490. [CrossRef]
148. Den Hartog, G.J.; Boots, A.W.; Adam-Perrot, A.; Brouns, F.; Verkooijen, I.W.; Weseler, A.R.; Haenen, G.R.; Bast, A. Erythritol is a sweet antioxidant. Nutrition 2010, 26, 449–458. [CrossRef]
149. Yokozawa, T.; Kim, H.Y.; Cho, E.J. Erythritol attenuates the diabetic oxidative stress through glucose metabolism and lipid peroxidation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 5485–5489. [CrossRef]
150. Roberts, A.C.; Porter, K.E. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2013, 10, 472–482. [CrossRef]
151. Boesten, D.M.P.H.J.; Berger, A.; de Cock, P.; Dong, H.; Hammock, B.D.; den Hartog, G.J.M.; Bast, A. Multi-targeted mechanisms underlying the endothelial protective effects of the diabetic-safe sweetener erythritol. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65741. [CrossRef]
152. Flint, N.; Hamburg, N.; Holbrook, M.; Dorsey, P.; LeLeiko, R.; Berger, A.; de Cock, P.; Bosscher, D.; Vita, J. Effects of erythritol on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A pilot study. Acta Diabetol. 2013, 51, 513–516. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
153. Boesten, D.M.; den Hartog, G.J.; de Cock, P.; Bosscher, D.; Bonnema, A.; Bast, A. Health effects of erythritol. Nutrafoods 2015, 14, 3–9. [CrossRef]
154. Dobbs, C.M.; Bell, L.N. Storage stability of tagatose in buffer solutions of various compositions. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 382–386. [CrossRef]
155. Kruger, C.L.; Whittaker, M.H.; Frankos, V.H.; Schroeder, R.E. Developmental toxicity study of d-tagatose in rats. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1999, 29 Pt 2, S29–S35. [CrossRef]
156. Kruger, C.L.; Whittaker, M.H.; Frankos, V.H.; Trimmer, G.W. 90-Day oral toxicity study of d-tagatose in rats. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1999, 29 Pt 2, S1–S10. [CrossRef]
157. Saunders, J.P.; Donner, T.W.; Sadler, J.H.; Levin, G.V.; Makris, N.G. Effects of acute and repeated oral doses of d-tagatose on plasma uric acid in normal and diabetic humans. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1999, 29 Pt 2, S57–S65. [CrossRef]
158. Boesch, C.; Ith, M.; Jung, B.; Bruegger, K.; Erban, S.; Diamantis, I.; Kreis, R.; Bär, A. Effect of oral d-tagatose on liver volume and hepatic glycogen accumulation in healthy male volunteers. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2001, 33, 257–267. [CrossRef]
159. Donner, T.W. The metabolic effects of dietary supplementation with d-tagatose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2006, 55 (Suppl. 1), 461.
160. Buemann, B.; Toubro, S.; Raben, A.; Astrup, A. Human tolerance to single, high dose of d-tagatose. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1999, 29, S66–S70. [CrossRef]
161. World Health Organization. Evaluation of Certain Food Additives Food Additives, Sixty-First Report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives; WHO Technical Report Series; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004; p. 922.
162. EFSA. Scientific opinion on the revised exposure assessment of Steviol glycosides (E 960) for the proposed uses as a food additive. EFSA J. 2014, 12, 3639.
163. Samuel, P.; Ayoob, K.T.; Magnuson, B.A.; Wölwer-Rieck, U.; Jeppesen, P.B.; Rogers, P.J.; Rowland, I.; Mathews, R. Stevia leaf to Stevia sweetener: Exploring its science, benefits, and future potential. J. Nutr. 2018, 148, 1186S–1205S. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
164. WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, & World Health Organization (JECFA). 82nd Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) Meeting—Food Additives (Summary and Conclusions); World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, June 2016.
165. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Final Assessment Report Application A.540 Steviol Glycosides as Intense Sweeteners. August 2008. Available online: https://www.foodstandards.gov.au/code/applications/documents/FAR_A540_Steviol_glycosides.pdf (accessed on 6 July 2020).
166. EFSA. Statement of EFSA Revised exposure assessment for steviol glycosides for the proposed uses as a food additive on request from the European Commission, Question No. EFSA-Q-2010-01214. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 1–19.
167. Matsui, M.; Matsui, K.; Kawasaki, Y.; Oda, Y.; Noguchi, T.; Kitagawa, Y.; Sawada, M.; Hayashi, M.; Nohmi, T.; Yoshihira, K.; et al. Evaluation of the genotoxicity of stevioside and steviol using six in vitro and one in vivo mutagenicity assays. Mutagenesis 1996, 11, 573–579. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
168. Pezzuto, J.M.; Nanayakkara, N.D.; Compadre, C.M.; Swanson, S.M.; Kinghorn, A.D.; Guenthner, T.M.; Sparnins, V.L.; Lam, L.K. Characterization of bacterial mutagenicity mediated by 13-hydroxy-ent-kaurenoic acid (steviol) and several structurally-related derivatives and evaluation of potential to induce glutathione S-transferase in mice. Mutat. Res. Genet. Toxicol. 1986, 169, 93–103. [CrossRef]
169. Klongpanichpak, S.; Temcharoen, P.; Toskulkao, C.; Apibal, S.; Glinsukon, T. Lack of mutagenicity of stevioside and steviol in Salmonella typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 1997, 80, 121–128.
170. Suttajit, M.; Vinitketkaumnuen, U.; Meevatee, U.; Buddhasukh, D. Mutagenicity and human chromosomal effect of stevioside, a sweetener from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Environ. Health Perspect. 1993, 101, 53–56.
171. Brusick, D. A critical review of the genetic toxicity of steviol and steviol glycosides. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, S83–S91. [CrossRef]
172. Mizushina, Y.; Akihisa, T.; Ukiya, M.; Hamasaki, Y.; Murakami-Nakai, C.; Kuriyama, I.; Takeuchi, T.; Sugawara, F.; Yoshida, H. Structural analysis of isosteviol and related compounds as DNA polymerase and DNA topoisomerase inhibitors. Life Sci. 2005, 77, 2127–2140. [CrossRef]
173. Melis, M. Effects of chronic administration of Stevia rebaudiana on fertility in rats. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 67, 157–161. [CrossRef]
174. Aze, Y.; Toyoda, K.; Imaida, K.; Hayashi, S.; Imazawa, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Takahashi, M. Subchronic oral toxicity study of stevioside in F344 rats. Eisei Shikenjo Hokoku 1991, 109, 48–54.
175. Saenphet, K.; Aritajat, S.; Saenphet, S.; Manosroi, J.; Manosroi, A. Safety evaluation of aqueous extracts from Aegle marmelos and Stevia rebaudiana on reproduction of female rats. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2006, 37, 203–205. [PubMed]
176. Geuns, J.M. Safety evaluation of Stevia and stevioside. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry (Part H), 1st ed.; Elsevier Science: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2002; pp. 299–319.
177. Barriocanal, L.A.; Palacios, M.; Benitez, G.; Benitez, S.; Jimenez, J.T.; Jimenez, N.; Rojas, V. Apparent lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some normotensive and hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2008, 51, 37–41. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
178. Abbas Momtazi-Borojeni, A.; Esmaeili, S.A.; Abdollahi, E.; Sahebkar, A. A review on the pharmacology and toxicology of steviol glycosides extracted from Stevia rebaudiana. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2017, 23, 1616–1622. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
179. Ahmad, J.; Khan, I.; Blundell, R.; Azzopardi, J.; Mahomoodally, M.F. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.: An updated review of its health benefits, industrial applications and safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 177–189. [CrossRef]
180. Zhang, Q.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Jia, X. Toxicological evaluation of ethanolic extract from Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaves: Genotoxicity and subchronic oral toxicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 2017, 86, 253–259. [CrossRef]
181. Barclay, A.; Sandall, P.; Shwide-Slavin, C. The Ultimate Guide to Sugars and Sweeteners: Discover the Taste, Use, Nutrition, Science, and Lore of Everything from Agave Nectar to Xylitol, 1st ed.; The Experiment: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 209–249.
182. Roohbakhsh, A.; Iranshahy, M.; Iranshahi, M. Glycyrrhetinic acid and its derivatives: Anti-cancer and cancer chemopreventive properties, mechanisms of action and structure-cytotoxic activity relationship. Curr. Med. Chem. 2016, 23, 498–517. [CrossRef]
183. Kim, Y.S.; Kim, J.J.; Cho, K.H.; Jung, W.S.; Moon, S.K.; Park, E.K.; Kim, D.H. Biotransformation of ginsenoside Rb1, crocin, amygdalin, geniposide, puerarin, ginsenoside Re, hesperidin, poncirin, glycyrrhizin, and baicalin by human fecal microflora and its relation to cytotoxicity against tumor cells. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 18, 1109–1114.
184. Yu, K.; Chen, F.; Li, C. Absorption, disposition, and pharmacokinetics of saponins from Chinese medicinal herbs: What do we know and what do we need to know more? Curr. Drug Metab. 2012, 13, 577–598. [CrossRef]
185. Kim, D.H.; Hong, S.W.; Kim, B.T.; Bae, E.A.; Park, H.Y.; Han, M.J. Biotransformation of glycyrrhizin by human intestinal bacteria and its relation to biological activities. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2000, 23, 172–177. [CrossRef]
186. Yim, J.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Moon, S.K.; Bae, H.S.; Kim, J.J.; Park, E.K.; Dim, D.H. Metabolic activities of ginsenoside Rb1, baicalin, glycyrrhizin and geniposide to their bioactive compounds by human intestinal microflora. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 10, 1580–1583. [CrossRef]
187. Kinghorn, D.A.; Kaneda, N.; Baek, N.; Kennelly, E.J. Noncariogenic intense natural sweeteners. Med. Res. Rev. 1998, 18, 347–360. [CrossRef]
188. Hsu, H.W.; Vavak, D.L.; Satterlee, L.D.; Miller, G.A. A multienzyme technique for estimating protein digestibility. J. Food Sci. 1977, 42, 1269–1273. [CrossRef]
189. WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, & World Health Organization (JECFA). Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants: Twenty-Ninth Report of the Joint FAO; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1986.
190. Higginbotham, J.; Snodin, D.; Eaton, K.; Daniel, J. Safety evaluation of thaumatin (talin protein). Food Chem. Toxicol. 1983, 21, 815–823. [CrossRef]
191. Zemanek, E.C.; Wasserman, B.P. Issues and advances in the use of transgenic organisms for the production of thaumatin, the intensely sweet protein from Thaumatococcus daniellii. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1995, 35, 455–466. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
192. EFSA–The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species. EFSA J. 2011, 9, 2354–2363.