메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 23, Issue , 2017, Pages 819-839

Software tools for scaffolding argumentation competence development

Author keywords

Discourse Activity; Educational Game; Online Learning Environment; Sentence Opener; Social Networking Site

Indexed keywords


EID: 85042255118     PISSN: 18713041     EISSN: 2213221X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_38     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (5)

References (105)
  • 2
    • 0010278824 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment
    • B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), (pp., Amsterdam: IOS
    • Aleven, V, & Ashley, K. D. (1997). Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples empirical evaluation of an intelligent learning environment. In B. du Boulay & R. Mizoguchi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th world conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED-97) (pp. 87–94). Amsterdam: IOS.
    • (1997) Proceedings of the 8Th World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED-97) , pp. 87-94
    • Aleven, V.1    Ashley, K.D.2
  • 3
    • 0034346337 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Interpersonal scripts in the anger narratives told by clients in psychotherapy
    • Andrew, G., & McMullen, L. M. (2000). Interpersonal scripts in the anger narratives told by clients in psychotherapy. Motivation and Emotion, 24(4), 271–284.
    • (2000) Motivation and Emotion , vol.24 , Issue.4 , pp. 271-284
    • Andrew, G.1    McMullen, L.M.2
  • 4
    • 34248654695 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), (pp., New York: Cambridge University Press
    • Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 443–460). New York: Cambridge University Press.
    • (2006) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , pp. 443-460
    • Andriessen, J.1
  • 5
    • 0037909640 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Argumentation and constructive interaction
    • P. Coirier., & J. Andriessen (Eds.), (pp., Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
    • Baker, M. (1999). Argumentation and constructive interaction. In P. Coirier., & J. Andriessen (Eds.). Studies in writing. Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 179–202). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    • (1999) Studies in Writing. Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing , pp. 179-202
    • Baker, M.1
  • 6
    • 0031516256 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment
    • Baker, M., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13(3), 175–193.
    • (1997) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , vol.13 , Issue.3 , pp. 175-193
    • Baker, M.1    Lund, K.2
  • 7
    • 0024040186 scopus 로고
    • Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies
    • Baumeister, R. F., & Scher, S. J. (1988). Self-defeating behavior patterns among normal individuals: Review and analysis of common self-destructive tendencies. Psychological Bulletin, 104(1), 3–22.
    • (1988) Psychological Bulletin , vol.104 , Issue.1 , pp. 3-22
    • Baumeister, R.F.1    Scher, S.J.2
  • 8
    • 13244299332 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments
    • Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21(4), 623–643.
    • (2005) Computers in Human Behaviour , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 623-643
    • Beers, P.J.1    Boshuizen, H.P.A.2    Kirschner, P.A.3    Gijselaers, W.H.4
  • 10
    • 0002614166 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups
    • R. Hall, N. Miyake, N. Enyedy (Eds.), (pp., Toronto: University of Toronto Press
    • Bell, P. (1997). Using argument representations to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In R. Hall, N. Miyake, N. Enyedy (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL-97) (pp. 10–19). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    • (1997) Proceedings of the 2Nd International Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL-97) , pp. 10-19
    • Bell, P.1
  • 11
    • 70449602388 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Curriculum planning: Trends in communication studies, workplace competencies, and current programs at 4-year colleges and universities
    • Bertelsen, D. A., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). Curriculum planning: Trends in communication studies, workplace competencies, and current programs at 4-year colleges and universities. Communication Education, 58(2), 262–275.
    • (2009) Communication Education , vol.58 , Issue.2 , pp. 262-275
    • Bertelsen, D.A.1    Goodboy, A.K.2
  • 12
    • 33947191091 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation
    • Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (3), 253–277.
    • (2007) International Journal of Science Education , vol.29 , Issue.3 , pp. 253-277
    • Clark, D.B.1    Sampson, V.2
  • 13
    • 41449097949 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality
    • Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293–321.
    • (2008) Journal of Research in Science Teaching , vol.45 , Issue.3 , pp. 293-321
    • Clark, D.B.1    Sampson, V.2
  • 14
    • 71449101556 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students’ own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions
    • Clark, D. B., D’Angelo, C. M., & Menekse, M. (2009). Initial structuring of online discussions to improve learning and argumentation: Incorporating students’ own explanations as seed comments versus an augmented-preset approach to seeding discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 321–333.
    • (2009) Journal of Science Education and Technology , vol.18 , Issue.4 , pp. 321-333
    • Clark, D.B.1    D’Angelo, C.M.2    Menekse, M.3
  • 16
    • 34249781970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Applying multilevel modelling on content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of the impact of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups
    • De Wever, B., Van Keer, H., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2007). Applying multilevel modelling on content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of the impact of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 436–447.
    • (2007) Learning and Instruction , vol.17 , Issue.4 , pp. 436-447
    • de Wever, B.1    van Keer, H.2    Schellens, T.3    Valcke, M.4
  • 19
    • 0034178558 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms
    • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
    • (2000) Science Education , vol.84 , Issue.3 , pp. 287-312
    • Driver, R.1    Newton, P.2    Osborne, J.3
  • 20
    • 11144256239 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing
    • Erkens, G., Jaspers, J., Prangsma, M., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Coordination processes in computer supported collaborative writing. Computers in Human Behaviour, 21(3), 463–486.
    • (2005) Computers in Human Behaviour , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 463-486
    • Erkens, G.1    Jaspers, J.2    Prangsma, M.3    Kanselaar, G.4
  • 21
    • 49449109004 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supporting learning using external representations
    • Ertl, B., Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2008). Supporting learning using external representations. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1599–1608.
    • (2008) Computers and Education , vol.51 , Issue.4 , pp. 1599-1608
    • Ertl, B.1    Kopp, B.2    Mandl, H.3
  • 22
    • 3943057484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions
    • Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22.
    • (2004) Educational Technology Research and Development , vol.52 , Issue.2 , pp. 5-22
    • Ge, X.1    Land, S.M.2
  • 23
    • 84890363504 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emotion, argumentation and informal logic
    • Gilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, argumentation and informal logic. Informal Logic, 24(3), 1–18.
    • (2004) Informal Logic , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 1-18
    • Gilbert, M.A.1
  • 24
    • 34548036229 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof
    • Gordon, T. F., Prakken, H., & Walton, D. (2007). The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10–15), 875–896.
    • (2007) Artificial Intelligence , vol.171 , Issue.10-15 , pp. 875-896
    • Gordon, T.F.1    Prakken, H.2    Walton, D.3
  • 25
    • 2142659247 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century
    • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.
    • (2004) Science Education , vol.88 , Issue.1 , pp. 28-54
    • Hofstein, A.1    Lunetta, V.N.2
  • 26
    • 74849115900 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning
    • Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 38 (1), 59–88.
    • (2010) Instructional Science , vol.38 , Issue.1 , pp. 59-88
    • Janssen, J.1    Erkens, G.2    Kirschner, P.A.3    Kanselaar, G.4
  • 27
    • 33746147003 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation
    • Jeong, A. C. (2006). The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Instructional Science, 34(5), 367–397.
    • (2006) Instructional Science , vol.34 , Issue.5 , pp. 367-397
    • Jeong, A.C.1
  • 28
    • 77953649907 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines
    • Jonassen, D. H., & Kim, B. (2010). Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Design justifications and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 439–457.
    • (2010) Educational Technology Research and Development , vol.58 , Issue.4 , pp. 439-457
    • Jonassen, D.H.1    Kim, B.2
  • 33
    • 36448973042 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning
    • Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, D. J. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708–721.
    • (2007) Learning and Instruction , vol.17 , Issue.6 , pp. 708-721
    • Kollar, I.1    Fischer, F.2    Slotta, D.J.3
  • 34
    • 0003924923 scopus 로고
    • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • (1991) The Skills of Argument
    • Kuhn, D.1
  • 35
    • 84936446842 scopus 로고
    • Thinking as argument
    • Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Harvard Educational Review, 62(2), 155–178.
    • (1992) Harvard Educational Review , vol.62 , Issue.2 , pp. 155-178
    • Kuhn, D.1
  • 36
    • 2542622020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cambridge: Harvard University Press
    • Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    • (2005) Education for Thinking
    • Kuhn, D.1
  • 37
    • 60249092010 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do students need to be taught how to reason?
    • Kuhn, D. (2009). Do students need to be taught how to reason? Educational Research Review, 4(1), 1–6.
    • (2009) Educational Research Review , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-6
    • Kuhn, D.1
  • 38
    • 0041968462 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments
    • Lazonder, A. W., Wilhelm, P., & Ootes, S. A. W. (2003). Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education, 41(3), 291–308.
    • (2003) Computers and Education , vol.41 , Issue.3 , pp. 291-308
    • Lazonder, A.W.1    Wilhelm, P.2    Ootes, S.A.W.3
  • 39
    • 20444462257 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evaluating and selecting counter-arguments
    • Leitão, S. (2003). Evaluating and selecting counter-arguments. Written Communication, 20 (3), 269–306.
    • (2003) Written Communication , vol.20 , Issue.3 , pp. 269-306
    • Leitão, S.1
  • 40
    • 0030339746 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation
    • Leith, K. P., & Baumeister, R. F. (1996). Why do bad moods increase self-defeating behavior? Emotion, risk taking, and self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(6), 1250–1267.
    • (1996) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , vol.71 , Issue.6 , pp. 1250-1267
    • Leith, K.P.1    Baumeister, R.F.2
  • 41
    • 84870608401 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • LASAD: Flexible representations for computer-based collaborative argumentation
    • Loll, F., & Pinkwart, N. (2013). LASAD: Flexible representations for computer-based collaborative argumentation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71(1), 91–109.
    • (2013) International Journal of Human-Computer Studies , vol.71 , Issue.1 , pp. 91-109
    • Loll, F.1    Pinkwart, N.2
  • 43
    • 34748922985 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate?
    • Lund, K., Molinari, J., Sejourne, A., & Baker, M. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate? International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2 (2-3), 273–295.
    • (2007) International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , vol.2 , Issue.2-3 , pp. 273-295
    • Lund, K.1    Molinari, J.2    Sejourne, A.3    Baker, M.4
  • 44
    • 85008843097 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collaborative learning through chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school
    • Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2007). Collaborative learning through chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 109–126.
    • (2007) Journal of Research on Technology in Education , vol.40 , Issue.1 , pp. 109-126
    • Marttunen, M.1    Laurinen, L.2
  • 45
    • 3543023324 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC
    • McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanlon, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(3), 194–204.
    • (2004) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , vol.20 , Issue.3 , pp. 194-204
    • McAlister, S.1    Ravenscroft, A.2    Scanlon, E.3
  • 47
    • 33846049994 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem
    • Munneke, L., Andriessen, J., Kanselaar, G., & Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(3), 1072–1088.
    • (2007) Computers in Human Behaviour , vol.23 , Issue.3 , pp. 1072-1088
    • Munneke, L.1    Andriessen, J.2    Kanselaar, G.3    Kirschner, P.4
  • 49
    • 78449298139 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health
    • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Busstra, M. C., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2011). Differences in learning processes between successful and less successful students in computer-supported collaborative learning in the field of human nutrition and health. Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(1), 309–318.
    • (2011) Computers in Human Behaviour , vol.27 , Issue.1 , pp. 309-318
    • Noroozi, O.1    Biemans, H.J.A.2    Busstra, M.C.3    Mulder, M.4    Chizari, M.5
  • 52
    • 84861186336 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research
    • Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2012b). Argumentation-based computer supported collaborative learning (ABCSCL). A systematic review and synthesis of fifteen years of research. Educational Research Review, 7(2), 79–106.
    • (2012) Educational Research Review , vol.7 , Issue.2 , pp. 79-106
    • Noroozi, O.1    Weinberger, A.2    Biemans, H.J.A.3    Mulder, M.4    Chizari, M.5
  • 53
    • 84872462610 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in a multidisciplinary CSCL environment
    • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013a). Scripting for construction of a transactive memory system in a multidisciplinary CSCL environment. Learning and Instruction, 25(1), 1–12.
    • (2013) Learning and Instruction , vol.25 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-12
    • Noroozi, O.1    Biemans, H.J.A.2    Weinberger, A.3    Mulder, M.4    Chizari, M.5
  • 55
    • 84867318524 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL
    • Noroozi, O., Weinberger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013c). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers and Education, 61(2), 59–76.
    • (2013) Computers and Education , vol.61 , Issue.2 , pp. 59-76
    • Noroozi, O.1    Weinberger, A.2    Biemans, H.J.A.3    Mulder, M.4    Chizari, M.5
  • 56
    • 84978086947 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game
    • Noroozi, O. (2016). Considering students’ epistemic beliefs to facilitate their argumentative discourse and attitudinal change with a digital dialogue game. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1208112
    • (2016) Innovations in Education and Teaching International
    • Noroozi, O.1
  • 57
    • 84993970612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction
    • Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2016). Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20981
    • (2016) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
    • Noroozi, O.1    Mulder, M.2
  • 58
    • 84973367341 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay
    • Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2016a). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. Internet and Higher Education, 31(1), 20–31.
    • (2016) Internet and Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.1 , pp. 20-31
    • Noroozi, O.1    Biemans, H.J.A.2    Mulder, M.3
  • 60
    • 84974593176 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific inquiry: The place of interpretation and argumentation
    • J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp
    • Norris, S., Phillips, L., & Osborne, J. F. (2008). Scientific inquiry: The place of interpretation and argumentation. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 87–98). National Science Teachers Association. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
    • (2008) National Science Teachers Association. Washington DC: National Science Foundation , pp. 87-98
    • Norris, S.1    Phillips, L.2    Osborne, J.F.3
  • 61
    • 20444464071 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counter-arguments during writing
    • Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counter-arguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97 (2), 157–169.
    • (2005) Journal of Educational Psychology , vol.97 , Issue.2 , pp. 157-169
    • Nussbaum, E.M.1    Kardash, C.M.2
  • 64
    • 77951583564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse
    • Osborne, J. (2010). Arguing to learn in science: The role of collaborative, critical discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463–466.
    • (2010) Science , vol.328 , Issue.5977 , pp. 463-466
    • Osborne, J.1
  • 65
    • 73649088702 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Promoting critical-thinking skills by using negotiation exercises
    • Page, D., & Mukherjee, A. (2007). Promoting critical-thinking skills by using negotiation exercises. Journal of Education for Business, 82(5), 251–58.
    • (2007) Journal of Education for Business , vol.82 , Issue.5 , pp. 251-258
    • Page, D.1    Mukherjee, A.2
  • 68
    • 0004927276 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Toward an integration of the social and the scientific: Observing, modeling, and promoting the explanatory coherence of reasoning
    • S. Read & L. Miller (Eds.), (pp., Mahwah: Erlbaum
    • Ranney, M., & Schank, P. (1998). Toward an integration of the social and the scientific: Observing, modeling, and promoting the explanatory coherence of reasoning. In S. Read & L. Miller (Eds.), Connectionist models of social reasoning and social behavior (pp. 245–274). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
    • (1998) Connectionist Models of Social Reasoning and Social Behavior , pp. 245-274
    • Ranney, M.1    Schank, P.2
  • 69
    • 84879304950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education
    • Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., & Gilabert, S. (2013). What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 483–520.
    • (2013) Review of Educational Research , vol.83 , Issue.4 , pp. 483-520
    • Rapanta, C.1    Garcia-Mila, M.2    Gilabert, S.3
  • 70
    • 35649019188 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games
    • Ravenscroft, A. (2007). Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 453–465.
    • (2007) Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , vol.23 , Issue.6 , pp. 453-465
    • Ravenscroft, A.1
  • 71
    • 79954472037 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning
    • Ravenscroft, A. (2011). Dialogue and connectivism: A new approach to understanding and promoting dialogue-rich networked learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 139–160.
    • (2011) International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning , vol.12 , Issue.3 , pp. 139-160
    • Ravenscroft, A.1
  • 72
  • 73
    • 33745764435 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Digital games and learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach
    • Ravenscroft, A., & McAlister, S. (2006). Digital games and learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(1), 37–50.
    • (2006) E-Learning and Digital Media , vol.3 , Issue.1 , pp. 37-50
    • Ravenscroft, A.1    McAlister, S.2
  • 74
  • 78
    • 85065448969 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Loll, F., & Pinkwart, N. (2012). Automated analysis and feedback techniques to support and teach argumentation: A survey. In N. Pinkwart & B. M. McLaren (Eds.), Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills (pp. 71–124). Sharjah: Bentham Science
    • Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Loll, F., & Pinkwart, N. (2012). Automated analysis and feedback techniques to support and teach argumentation: A survey. In N. Pinkwart & B. M. McLaren (Eds.), Educational technologies for teaching argumentation skills (pp. 71–124). Sharjah: Bentham Science.
  • 79
    • 84875545730 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Promoting critical, elabora-tive discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams
    • Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Weinberger, A., & Niebuhr, S. (2013). Promoting critical, elabora-tive discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams. Instructional Science, 42(4), 127–157.
    • (2013) Instructional Science , vol.42 , Issue.4 , pp. 127-157
    • Scheuer, O.1    McLaren, B.M.2    Weinberger, A.3    Niebuhr, S.4
  • 81
    • 0041526146 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system
    • Soller, A. (2001). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 40–62.
    • (2001) International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education , vol.12 , pp. 40-62
    • Soller, A.1
  • 83
    • 84857041449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing in computer-supported collaborative learning environment
    • Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive processing in computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323.
    • (2012) Instructional Science , vol.40 , Issue.2 , pp. 297-323
    • Stegmann, K.1    Wecker, C.2    Weinberger, A.3    Fischer, F.4
  • 84
    • 24944562967 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill
    • J. Andriessen & P. Corrier (Eds.), (pp., Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press
    • Stein, N. L., & Bernas, R. (1999). The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill. In J. Andriessen & P. Corrier (Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 97–116). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
    • (1999) Foundations of Argumentative Text Processing , pp. 97-116
    • Stein, N.L.1    Bernas, R.2
  • 85
    • 0038272780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse
    • Suthers, D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7(3), 254–277.
    • (2001) Journal of Universal Computer Science , vol.7 , Issue.3 , pp. 254-277
    • Suthers, D.1
  • 87
    • 0037995721 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning
    • Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. (2003). An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 183–219.
    • (2003) The Journal of the Learning Sciences , vol.12 , Issue.2 , pp. 183-219
    • Suthers, D.1    Hundhausen, C.2
  • 89
    • 0004096846 scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
    • Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    • (1958) The Uses of Argument
    • Toulmin, S.1
  • 90
    • 39749132860 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams
    • Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2007). Representational tools in computer-supported collaborative argumentation-based learning: How dyads work with constructed and inspected argumentative diagrams. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 485–521.
    • (2007) The Journal of the Learning Sciences , vol.16 , Issue.4 , pp. 485-521
    • van Amelsvoort, M.1    Andriessen, J.2    Kanselaar, G.3
  • 91
    • 39749175704 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams
    • Van Amelsvoort, M., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2008). How students structure and relate argumentative knowledge when learning together with diagrams. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24 (3), 1293–1313.
    • (2008) Computers in Human Behaviour , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 1293-1313
    • van Amelsvoort, M.1    Andriessen, J.2    Kanselaar, G.3
  • 93
    • 0038811360 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load
    • Van Bruggen, J., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138.
    • (2002) Learning and Instruction , vol.12 , Issue.1 , pp. 121-138
    • van Bruggen, J.1    Kirschner, P.2    Jochems, W.3
  • 94
    • 85009553095 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using representational tools to support historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning
    • Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Erkens, G., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Using representational tools to support historical reasoning in computer-supported collaborative learning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(1), 25–41.
    • (2005) Technology, Pedagogy and Education , vol.14 , Issue.1 , pp. 25-41
    • van Drie, J.1    van Boxtel, C.2    Erkens, G.3    Kanselaar, G.4
  • 96
    • 0037797168 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse
    • Van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1999). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Discourse Studies, 1(4), 479–497.
    • (1999) Discourse Studies , vol.1 , Issue.4 , pp. 479-497
    • van Eemeren, F.H.1    Grootendorst, R.2
  • 99
    • 39749148889 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves
    • Van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., & Henkemans, F. S. (2008). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 475–493.
    • (2008) Journal of Pragmatics , vol.40 , Issue.3 , pp. 475-493
    • van Eemeren, F.H.1    Grootendorst, R.2    Henkemans, F.S.3
  • 103
    • 29144508193 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies
    • Walton, D. N. (2000). The place of dialogue theory in logic, computer science and communication studies. Synthese, 123(3), 327–346.
    • (2000) Synthese , vol.123 , Issue.3 , pp. 327-346
    • Walton, D.N.1
  • 104
    • 27644502447 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning
    • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 46(1), 71–95.
    • (2006) Computers and Education , vol.46 , Issue.1 , pp. 71-95
    • Weinberger, A.1    Fischer, F.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.