ICT-support for grounding in the classroom

Instructional Science

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 535-556

  Beers, Pieter J ^a,b   Kirschner, Paul A ^a,d   Boshuizen, Henny P A ^a   Gijselaers, Wim H ^c  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Coercion; Common ground; Complex problem solving; ICT tools; Negotiation; Secondary vocational education

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148845030     PISSN: 00204277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11251-007-9018-5     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alpay, L., Giboin, A., & Dieng, R. (1998). Accidentology: An example of problem solving by multiple agents with multiple representations. In M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. De Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 152-174). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
2. Avouris, N. M., Dimitracopoulou, A., & Komis, V. (2003). On analysis of collaborative problem solving: An object-oriented approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 147-167.
3. Baker, M. J., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 31-63). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.
4. Baker, M. J., & Lund, K. (1997). Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 175-193.
5. Barron, B. (2003). When smart groups fail. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(3), 307-359.
6. Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning. An approach to medical education. New York, USA: Springer.
7. Beers, P. J., Boshuizen, H. P. A., Kirschner, P. A., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2005). Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 623-643.
8. Boshuizen, H. P. A., & Tabachneck-Schijf, H. J. M. (1998). Problem solving with multiple representations by multiple and single agents: An analysis of the issues involved. In M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. De Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 137-151). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
9. Bromme, R. (2000). Beyond one's own perspective: The psychology of cognitive interdisciplinarity. In P. Weingart, & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practicing interdisciplinarity (pp. 115-133). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
10. Bromme, R., Rambow, R., & Nückles, M. (2001). Expertise and estimating what other people know: The influence of professional experience and type of knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(4), 317-330.
11. Buckingham Shum, S. J., MacLean, A., Bellotti, V. M. E., & Hammond, N. V. (1997). Graphical argumentation and design cognition. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 267-300.
12. Chang, H.-T., & Lee, A. T. (2001). The relationship between psychological safety, organisation context support and team learning behaviour in taiwan. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 5(2), 185-192.
13. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington DC, USA: American Psychological Association.
14. Clark, H. H., & Schaefer, E. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
15. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small grousps. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.
16. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting cscl: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of cscl: Can we support cscl? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
17. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
18. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
19. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405-441.
20. Fischer, G., Nakakoji, K., & Ostwald, J. (1995). Supporting the evolution of design artifacts with representation of context and intent. In G. M. Olson & S. Schuon (Eds.), Proceedings of the symposium on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods and techniques (DIS '95) (pp. 7-15), Ann Arbor, MI, USA, August 23-25, 1995. New York: ACM Press.
21. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
22. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Columbus, US: Prentice-Hall.
23. Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable cscl environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence. Doctoral dissertation, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
24. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
25. Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
26. Löhner, S., Van Joolingen, W., & Savelsbergh, E. R. (2003). The effect of external representation on constructing computer models of complex phenomena. Instructional Science, 31, 395-418.
27. Mulder, I., Swaak, J., & Kessels, J. (2002). Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1), 35-47.
28. Norman, D. A. (1993). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Cambridge, US: Perseus Publishing.
29. Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 1-8.
30. Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
31. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
32. Song, H.-D., Grabowski, B. L., Koszalka, T. A., & Harkness, W. L. (2006). Patterns of instructional-design factors prompting reflective thinking in middle-school and college level problem-based learning environments. Instructional Science, 34, 63-87.
33. Suthers, D. D. (2001). Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 7, 254-277.
34. Swaak, J., Van Joolingen, W. R., & De Jong, T. (1998). Supporting simulation-based learning; the effects of model progression and assignments on definitional and intuitive knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 8(3), 235-252.
35. Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-295.
36. Thomas, A. P., Bull, P., & Roger, D. (1982). Conversational exchange analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1(2), 141-155.
37. Van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in cscl and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12, 121-138.
38. Van Bruggen, J. M. (2003). Explorations in graphical argumentation; the use of external representations in collaborative problem solving. Unpublished PhD-thesis, Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
39. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2004, April). Effects of social factors on shared cognition and teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Paper presented at the AERA, San Diego, USA.
40. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30.